RSS
Facebook Picked Up Friendster's Patents For More Than It Cost To Buy Friendster
from the patent-valuation dept
A few years back, there was quite an uproar over the discovery that Friendster had received a patent on the basic concepts of "social networks." The company, which was already becoming an also-ran in the social networking space made a lot of noise about enforcing the patents against competitors, but not much came of it. However, the company did keep collecting patents. We were actually wondering about those patents a couple months ago when Amazon popped up with a patent on some basic social networking concepts. Turns out that just a month earlier Facebook had quietly bought Friendster's 7 patents and 11 patent applications for an astounding $40 million. Of course, it wasn't $40 million entirely in cash, but a mixture of cash, advertising and "payments for virtual goods" (don't ask).
What's impressive here is that the entire company Friendster had been sold just a few months earlier for... $39.5 million. So the buyer has effectively recouped the purchase price in less than a year. Impressive. As for why Facebook just wasted so much money (even if not all of it is "real") on a bunch of patents? As Liz Gannes postulates, it's probably just to keep the patents from getting in the way of an upcoming IPO. For a company currently valued at such insane levels, $40 million to clear an obstacle to an IPO is nothing major -- especially when a portion of the deal is via in-kind services. Hopefully Facebook knows better than to start using the patents offensively, but somehow, I get the feeling this is not the last we'll hear about these patents.
9 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- How Publishers Repeated The Same Mistake As Record Labels: DRM Obsession Gave Amazon Dominant Position
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- The Web Is Saved: East Texas Jury Says Eolas Patents Are Invalid
- Can Facebook Really Bring About A More Peer-to-Peer, Bottom-Up World?
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Sums it up pretty much - what a 'winning' decision, lol
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
These patents weren't required for anyone to think of and implement any technology they cover and so they do little to promote the progress of anything but wasted money that could be better spent on invention and innovation instead.
People should participate in
http://www.peertopatent.org/
which allows people to submit prior art examples for patent applications in hopes that the USPTO will see them.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall or other opaque surface in the vicinity of the cat, then moving the laser so as to cause the bright pattern of light to move in an irregular way...
Completely unrelated but I just learned read it and posted into the first patent related post on techdirt I could find
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is why startups like patents
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
nichole
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment