Werewolf TV Show Blocked From DVD Release Due To Music Licensing

from the promoting-the-progress dept

We were just talking about how DVDs of various TV shows, like The State and WKRP in Cincinnati were being crippled by music licensing rights that forced them to remove the original, classic music, and replace it with bland copies. However, in some cases, it's much, much worse. Michael Scott lets us know that some TV shows are being totally prevented from coming to DVD. The latest is the TV show Werewolf, which was apparently working on a DVD release, but the project has now been shut down, due to music licensing problems:
The Shout Factory had to cancel the release because of two artists (which will remain unnamed) that would not play ball. Sony does not have the individual audio tracks, so they were unable to replace the songs, as the audio was mixed together. The two songs were featured over dialogue scenes that could not be cut. The Shout Factory's only option, even after spending a lot of time and money on it, was to cancel it and give the title back to Sony. If Sony had the audio tracks, it would have been easy to replace the two songs.
It's still difficult to see how this makes any sense at all. It shouldn't require relicensing, and even if it does, it's plainly ridiculous for the musicians to refuse. It's difficult to see how this benefits them in any way.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Alan Gerow (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 12:50pm

    I absolutely abhor the theme song they had to put in place for the original Married With Children theme song (which wasn't written for the show, but was licensed presumably). Without hearing the phrase "Love and marriage..." at the beginning of an episode, it just doesn't feel the same.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:00pm

    Theme songs....

    Love the theme from the sciFi show FireFly ....

    I wonder if producers are now putting a "for all future distribution types named and un-named" clause in the contracts for music, and getting the distribution rights done in advance.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:02pm

    Big Mistake

    (which will remain unnamed)

    Now that is a huge mistake.
    He should be calling them out publicly.
    Let the fans of the show give the greedy artists a shaming.

    I for one would like to know, so that I could avoid the artists. However, it is probably safe to assume they are on some major label so I am already avoiding them.

    The Shout Factory could just release a very simple one liner that states we cannot release the show because these two artists want a whole lot of money. Simple and factual. If the artists tried to sue over it then they would just get a nice little Streisand effect.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:06pm

    Have you ever SEEN that show?

    "It's difficult to see how this benefits them in any way."

    Depending on the scenes they're talking about, there's a chance that the music these artists made was so plum god awful that they don't want it being repeated for fear that their children will be unable to procreate as a result.

    Or, hey, maybe they're just stupid.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    The Mad (Patent) Prosecutor, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:07pm

    In other news

    In other news, Mad Prosecutor blocked from camping on mountain by man who owns mountain.

    "It's just sitting there unused," said Mad Prosecutor. "Why should I be prevented from using it just because I don't own the right to use it? I'm like, totally prevented from using the mountain. I had been planning to run a business letting people look down the side of the mountain, but my project has been shut down. It's difficult to see how this benefits anyone in any way."


    I am very, very well acquainted, yet unconvinced, by the whole "scarce goods vs. infinite [sic] goods" line of "reasoning," so no need to argue along those lines.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:09pm

    Funny

    I'll bet the people with 'pirated' (see: shared) episodes aren't all that inconvenienced... although now all of them who wanted to buy DVDs won't be able to.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    jilocasin, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:20pm

    Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Lobo's comment is just what I was thinking.

    If you _want_ to buy the series, you can't because they can't release it.

    ..but if you go to one of many sites you can download the original airing, with commercials stripped, in handy dandy DivX or similar format, free of charge.

    Of course it's those horrible people who want everything for free that is hurting the industry, it couldn't possibly be greed preventing them from even offering a product people clearly want to pay for, naw...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:27pm

    Re: In other news

    In this case its not scarce vs infinite....

    Its just forced scarcity

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Yeah...

    Me: "I want to buy this series on DVD"
    Them: "You can't because we can't/won't release it"
    Me: "OK, I'll download it from P2P then"
    Them: "No! That's evil, you're stealing!"
    Me: "....."

    I "pirated" Night Of The Creeps and The Monster Squad while waiting several years for the DVDs to be released (more rights issues, as I understand it), and now own the DVDs that they're been released. I don't believe that the producers had any room to complain while they were actively refusing my money, for whatever reason.

    Yet another flaw in the P2P = theft argument. If I'm sitting around waiting to pay them money and I can't for some reason, they can't also claim I'm stealing from them. It's a directly contradictory argument.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Another AC, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:37pm

    Re: Big Mistake

    Well, by them not mentioning the names I still don't know who they and probably never will.

    No Free Publicity For you!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:42pm

    Re: In other news

    It would be more like... you just purchased the mountain to open the buisness. You paid for the land, the deeds, the rights, the equipment, the housing, everything. And as you stand ready to move forward, you are told you have to shut down, becouse while you own or have rights to 99% of the mountain, some crazy guy decided to draw a line around the base of it. Meanwhile, you own your mountain, but becouse of this guy who owns 1 inch of land around it, you cannot ever use it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    iamtheky (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 1:59pm

    Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Wouldn't every unreleased track and bootleg concert ever fall into that category. Indeed, its all very asinine but the 'its not stealing because its not for sale' defense is shoddy at best.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Derek Reed, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:02pm

    Re: In other news

    Yet for some reason we don't seem to have the dilemma of billions of people camping on mountains that don't belong to them. I wonder if your analogy really has any relevance when we're talking about something an order of magnitude more usable/accessible and less scarce. Perhaps?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Gordon Firemark, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:07pm

    The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    This betrays a surprising ignorance as to how music licensing for TV shows is done. The producers of the show COULD HAVE gotten an "all media, in perpetuity" license when they first cleared music for the show, but instead chose to save money by negotiating licenses with more limited scope. Bottom line... the broader grant of rights costs more.

    So, the rights originally granted were for TV only, and probably limited to a certain number of airings, and only in certain territories. Any other rights need to be negotiated separately.

    So, the publishers and labels/artists who control the songs are entitled to ask for more money for the expanded right the producers are seeking.

    Suppose someone wanted to rent out your backyard for a party on Saturday night. You quote them a fee of $1,000.
    Then, they decide they want to move the party into the house, and also on the front lawn. Wouldn't you expect to be paid more for the bigger event?


    The real bad news here is that the producers of the TV show didn't have the foresight to keep copies of the dialogue tracks without music. They deserve to be in this situation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    Leviathant (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:11pm

    A la The Maxx

    A similar issue has kept the MTV animated production of The Maxx from coming out on DVD. Too bad... there's a great SVHS'd-from-satellite 2xDVD set available on the torrents though. In stereo, too!
    Too bad so many people try to stick their fingers in the pie - and expect a larger piece than is reasonable.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:12pm

    It's good that they keep doing this

    Because one day (hopefully) everyone will relize they just need to not listen to music or watch any TV or go to any shows until we run these nazi bastards out. The music and such will alway be there so don't worry about that. Just need to get the "gangster" (RIAA, MPAA, and all the others) component removed.

    I'm a criminal, he's a criminal, wouldn't you like to be a criminal too?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:12pm

    Re: The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    First, I'm not sure anyone is saying the producers don't have the right to do what they're doing, it's a matter of questioning their actions. For instance, taking your analogy:

    "Suppose someone wanted to rent out your backyard for a party on Saturday night. You quote them a fee of $1,000.
    Then, they decide they want to move the party into the house, and also on the front lawn. Wouldn't you expect to be paid more for the bigger event?"

    Perfectly reasonable. However, the conclusion of your analogy is that the renters don't want to pay the price you're expecting, so you refuse them the party, your lawn remains totally vacant so you don't make ANY money, THEY don't get to throw ANY party, and the only party in town is now on the vacant lot next door, and it costs them nothing.

    That just doesn't make sense for anyone.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Me, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:15pm

    Re: The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    It's too bad that an intelligent comment such as yours will get throttled by the idiotic eight year olds that normally post here (DarkHelmet comes to mind).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    Josh (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:21pm

    Audio editing

    I'm no expert in audio editing, but is not having the original tracks such a huge issue? If it was a popular song, it should be easy enough to get copies from somewhere - even if the only legal way is to search the used market and find a CD/tape of them. Manually run the scene through a reverse waveform of them and tweak as needed.

    Obviously, none of the above should even be necessary, but find some way around the overreaching rightsholders and show them how powerless they are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:21pm

    Re: Re: The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    Hey, I thought my response was rather thoughtful and measured, you big poopy head!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:29pm

    Just cut the music out completely and market the DVD as "Completely remastered"...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    PRMan, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:34pm

    Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    "people clearly want to pay for"

    I thought we were talking about Werewolf... ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Gunnar (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:34pm

    That's a shame. Shout Factory is a great company that does a lot of older TV shows and a lot of good comics (I'm slightly biased because they send a lot of stuff to my work for us to review).

    But yeah, call out the people who won't license the music. There are few forces more powerful than angry former fans.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    TW Burger (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:40pm

    I'll do it for free

    I worked as an audio engineer for a radio program a few years back. I'll take out all of the music and leave the dialog in the two scenes in a day or two and I'll do it for free, just give me a closing credit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:51pm

    Here's an idea: How about making the "artist" agree BEFORE the shoot? This is ridiculous. In this day and age, anyone NOT doing that is a retard.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    hegemon13, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:57pm

    Re: In other news

    "I am very, very well acquainted, yet unconvinced, by the whole "scarce goods vs. infinite [sic] goods" line of "reasoning," so no need to argue along those lines."

    Or, you might as well say:

    "I am very, very well acquainted, yet unconvinced, by the whole "flat earth vs. 'round' [sic] earth" line of "reasoning," so no need to argue along those lines."

    Convinced or not, reality is reality. There are substantial differences, both in reality and in law, between physical property and intellectual property. To say you are unconvinced of those differences does not mean they don't exist. It just makes you look stubborn and primitive.

    Besides, your analogy is an exceptionally poor one in that, if the mountain was truly unused (unimproved/unmaintained) by it's owner, encroachment rights and/or government seizure could quite possibly make Mad Prosecutor's actions reasonable and legal. No only that, but the show was licensed from Sony, who, in this analogy, owns the mountain. The problem is, they let someone else plant a couple trees on it who now demands payment every time someone looks at said trees.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    icon
    Alan Gerow (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:59pm

    Re: Big Mistake

    How about naming them publicly so the artists that DID reach agreements can know who cost them some residual licensing money!

    Two artists cost an unknown number of other artists royalty payments. If I were one of the ones that reach an agreement, I'd want to know who kept me from getting a check.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    Scott@GGE (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:23pm

    Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Yes, in a way.

    If my business model does not include income from a song because I refuse to release that song into the market, then I have *LOST* nothing when that song shows up on P2P networks.

    I have *gained* recognition and publicity because there is yet another work of art associated with me.

    There is a massive underground culture around move and tv scores. Not the edited, or sometimes re-produced, 60 minute CDs, but for the original unedited scores. Many of these scores are never released to the public for purchase, but they still hit the nets in various ways.

    The studios have lost no potential sales, they have experienced no material losses, they have only gained a following of fans of a composer or a studio.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    rjk (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:37pm

    Re: The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    That may be true... but who could have anticipated DVDs and the popularity of TV series on DVD when negotiating licensing deals in the 70s and 80s?

    People just want their culture, keeping it from them for such frivolous reasons is stupid.

    But I guess it just goes to show how inept and incompetent entertainment lawyers are that deals can't be done to get these shows released in a timely manner in their original form.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    MattP, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:51pm

    Re: Re: Big Mistake

    Seems like a strong dose of BAD publicity would be just what the Dr. ordered.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 3:59pm

    Screwing themselves

    The more I hear about this kind of idiocy from rent-seekers, the more comfortable I am with 'piracy.'

    I want my culture as it was, dammit!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    DJ (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 4:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    And yet...

    The Mona Lisa isn't for sale, but if someone were to offer free copies (applicable copyright issues notwithstanding), and you went and picked one up...is that stealing? Nope.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    Mike Masnick (profile), Sep 15th, 2009 @ 5:22pm

    Re: The producers got what they paid for then... now want more.

    This betrays a surprising ignorance as to how music licensing for TV shows is done

    No, not ignorance. I recognize how it's done. I just think it's stupid.

    The producers of the show COULD HAVE gotten an "all media, in perpetuity" license when they first cleared music for the show

    Well, back when the show was on, there was no additional market, so that didn't make sense.

    Bottom line... the broader grant of rights costs more.

    No, really, the bottom line is what's the point of blocking the DVD from coming out entirely? How does that represent any kind of win for the musicians? It represents only a loss.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 5:26pm

    Re: Theme songs....

    Whedon wrote the theme song to firefly, so there's no danger there =)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 7:24pm

    Re: Funny

    I'll bet the people with 'pirated' (see: shared) episodes aren't all that inconvenienced... although now all of them who wanted to buy DVDs won't be able to.

    They're only available as low quality WMV files and episodes 3, 10 and 26 are missing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 7:28pm

    Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    ..but if you go to one of many sites you can download the original airing, with commercials stripped, in handy dandy DivX or similar format, free of charge.

    I've only seen it in low quality WMV with three episodes missing. Have you actually see it available in better quality or are you just assuming it's available?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 15th, 2009 @ 7:41pm

    Re: A la The Maxx

    A similar issue has kept the MTV animated production of The Maxx from coming out on DVD. Too bad... there's a great SVHS'd-from-satellite 2xDVD set available on the torrents though. In stereo, too!

    Who's it by? I see a set done by "Noir", but he states that he made it into widescreen, and so &%$#@! up the aspect ratio on it. I know I can fix it in a computer player, but it bothers me that someone would be so stupid as to distort the image just to have it fill the screen.

    There's also a set of MP4 files that were ripped from MTV's site.

    I suppose either would be better than the crappy copies I have now.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), Sep 16th, 2009 @ 6:05am

    Re: Re: Big Mistake

    That is also a good point. From both of the replies to my original.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 16th, 2009 @ 7:47am

    Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    You're not likely to receive either a direct answer or link here. I'll say only this: the Chiller channel aired the whole series, and lots of people do HDTV rips.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 16th, 2009 @ 7:56pm

    Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Maybe so, but it doesn't look like those HDTV rips have made it to any of the usual sources, since they don't appear to be on the newsgroups, the eD2K network, BitTorrent, or even the internet in general. Any search for the show only turns up links to the WMV files with the three missing episodes.

    If you happen to know of a source for them, I'd love it if you could send an anonymous email to ydobon [AT] mail [DOT] com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    wvhillbilly (profile), Sep 16th, 2009 @ 9:00pm

    Greed or arrogance

    I don't know which attitude this mindset reflects more of, greed or arrogance. Seems to me this is like cutting off your nose to spite your face, as the old expression goes.

    I don't see how people who do such things benefit from them any way whatsoever, and they just spoil things for everyone else.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    wvhillbilly (profile), Sep 16th, 2009 @ 9:24pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    The original Mona Lisa should be public domain, I think it predates even the concept of copyright. If someone wanted to take a photo of the original painting and distribute his own copies of it I don't see where there would be a problem with that,

    Now if you distribute copies of someone else's photo without their permission, that would be another matter entirely.

    (Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. If you want legal advice on this, go see a lawyer.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    wvhillbilly (profile), Sep 16th, 2009 @ 9:42pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    The reason you only see WMV files is because HDTV files are probably so large it would be impractical to attempt sending them over the Internet. Even compressed WMV files can be quite large, depending on content. Downloading such a series in HDTV could take days, even with broadband.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    GJ (profile), Sep 17th, 2009 @ 12:01am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    Thousands of people take pictures of the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, every single day and distribute their copies on facebook.

    So far, the louvre isn't hurt by this.

    --GJ--

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    Rekrul, Sep 17th, 2009 @ 10:53pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copied off the Air and 'shared' much better again....

    The reason you only see WMV files is because HDTV files are probably so large it would be impractical to attempt sending them over the Internet. Even compressed WMV files can be quite large, depending on content. Downloading such a series in HDTV could take days, even with broadband.

    Yeah, nice try. The WMV werewolf episodes range in size from 30MB to 800MB. The average size for a half-hour show recorded from HDTV and encoded into an Xvid AVI file is 180-240MB. That works out to 5.2GB - 6.9GB total. On a 6Mbit account, 7GB would take less than 4 hour to download.

    Note that HDTV rips are typically not "HD", they're only taken from an HD source. If they were 720p rips, that would be a different story. Then, the entire series would come to around 43GB and take 17+ hours to download.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    JOHN, Oct 14th, 2009 @ 11:36am

    I WILL NEVER BUY A AUDIO CD AGAIN SCREW THEM

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    identicon
    Alan Gallant, Oct 28th, 2009 @ 12:00pm

    werewolf tv series

    Do you know how long I have waited for this to be released? And now it's not because 2,probably has-beens at this point, won't play ball? This really sucks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    joe, Nov 29th, 2009 @ 9:03am

    WEREWOLF

    Let me know their names and I'll make em play ball

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    Eric, Dec 24th, 2009 @ 1:35pm

    Cost of the title from Sony ?

    What is the cost of buying the title from Sony ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    Gregory, Dec 26th, 2009 @ 8:11am

    Had them from HD rips..then threw them away

    I had freakin' HD chiller episodes taped from my DVR to DVD discs saved (I had NEVER seen the eps so clear!)..then literally dumped them in the trash because I heard the series was coming out that month officially..now I have NOTHING at all(STUPID ME!!!) I've never experienced a series I liked that shut down the release is the reason why I just didn't think..DAMN! HD episodes!!
    Every day since then I keep saying "DAMN!" to myself.
    Now I have to buy the doggone series again from a store online to get terrible quality just to have it in my possession again. DAMN!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    Gregory A. Campbell, Feb 22nd, 2010 @ 6:42pm

    Werewolfs and Music

    Well as i see it the artists would make out buy getting there sound back out there where this new generation would here and want to here more of them being it would be on a ubber DVD Werewolf which i would gladly buy for what ever the price being that i so enjoyed it so when it aired. It is the greedy music types that would ruin it for so many who would enjoy their music once again! What short sightedness on their part. But i will wait with my fingers crossed the one day they will see the light and let stand to a new audence there music with and ubber show that moved so many and say to all i was a part of that!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2010 @ 4:37am

    One of the Songs was - "Silent Running:

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Apr 30th, 2010 @ 4:45am

    Sorry about that last post.
    One of the songs holding up the rights is Silent Running by "Mike and the Mechanics" Here's a youtube link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ep7W89I_V_g
    It was a great song and very memorable in the tv show.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    Bill, Aug 8th, 2011 @ 6:00am

    mike don't need

    Mike don't need no stinking money, evidently. The bass player for Genesis, I guess has plenty already. That's too bad for fans of the show. But you would think he wouldn't be so pig-headed, or greedy, whatever is the case. The fans loose out.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    identicon
    Wolfric, Aug 22nd, 2011 @ 9:05am

    Here's a thought

    If only SF was willing to spend a bit more ... Yeah, they got the audio all mixed together. But they can listen and copy down the dialog, hire actors (same ones, unknowns, whomever) to loop the dialog for dubbing, have some foley artists remake any needed sound effects, and lay in some music they can get the license to.

    It won't be original, it'll probably be crappy, but having crappy is better than having none. And honestly, how many scenes in the whole season did they use the music in? Likely just one each. That's probably just a few minutes worth. So you get a couple odd blips. In the end, still worth it. Purist vs getting it released. I'm all for the latter. Would it really be that much more effort to get this done?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    identicon
    Mark Humphreys, Jan 7th, 2012 @ 12:25am

    RE: Here's a thought by poster Wolfric

    There are 2 posts I want to make a comment on. First is by TW Burger: Sep 15th, 2009 @ 2:40pm

    (I worked as an audio engineer for a radio program a few years back. I'll take out all of the music and leave the dialog in the two scenes in a day or two and I'll do it for free, just give me a closing credit).

    Now did you even read what the problem is. apparantley not: If the "music" & "dialogue" was MIXED TOGETHER IN THE SAME TRACK...YOU CAN NOT STRIP OUT JUST THE MUSIC. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE !!!. That is like pushing Steroe to mono and trying to seperate the 2 from the one mono track. IMPOSSIBLE !!!

    Now in response to wolfrics post. This is the one that does make the best sense. wether you are going to get the best quality or not. What you do is strip out the audio track entirely since bothe the music& dialogue is on the same track. Get a hold of the scrpit which sounds like they do have it. (No need to listen to the track if you have the script). then lay down 2 new songs from that era and either get that original cast member in if they are still alive or still willing to do a dub over or get someone else that can come closely to sounding like them and lay down the 2 Seperate tracks like they should have originaly done. thta way they can always go back and make adjustments by just stripping out the one audio track that is either the music or the Dialogue.

    My Experience: working in the industry for over 20 years and having an audio specialist as a roomate from years back

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    matt, Jan 8th, 2012 @ 4:34pm

    what an ass

    they should take the music out and dub over it with somethin else

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    identicon
    Opulent Omega, Apr 10th, 2012 @ 10:55am

    The 2 Artists

    As someone already posted...

    1 of the 2 artists holding things up are indeed "Mike & The Mechanics" (Paul Karak? Mike Rutherford?)

    I don't know for certain who the second one is, but my guess would be Timbuk 3 ("The Future's So Bright I Gotta Wear Shades")

    Shame them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Ben, Apr 29th, 2012 @ 1:56pm

    Re: The 2 Artists

    Timbuck 3 "The Future's So Bright I Gotta Wear Shades" is featured in "Being Human series 4" So if it was this band, why would't they let it be used in "Werewolf TV Series".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    identicon
    Beau, Feb 2nd, 2013 @ 4:44am

    problems

    I think that is a bunch of bullshit they are a bunch of faggots that prevented them from coming out on dvd I he you flop faggots

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This