Facebook Wants To Own Idea Of Crowdsourced Translations

from the some-prior-art? dept

Apparently Facebook is trying to patent the idea of crowdsourced translations of its service. The actual patent application was filed in December of 2008, but the real priority date (I believe) is December of 2007 (when I think the company filed a provisional patent).

This one caught my attention for a few reasons -- with a major one being that way back in March of 2006, some friends of mine were working on a startup called Gabbly, which did online chat, and they had amazing success with crowdsourcing translations. Now, the Facebook patent is a little more advanced, because beyond just asking people to translate, it includes a voting mechanism. But, still, the evolution of crowdsourced translations shows the total silliness of even trying to throw patents in the middle. Almost immediately after Gabbly started doing crowdsourced translations, another online chat provider, Meebo, did the same. Gabbly used a forum. Meebo tried a wiki. Others picked up on the idea and did slightly different variations, and everyone kept innovating, and no one felt the need to own the concept of crowdsourced translations or to prohibit others from doing it.

But now, suddenly, there needs to be a patent on the concept?

I'm confused how anyone could think this meets the criteria of "promoting the progress." After all, plenty of others had figured out how to do crowdsourced translations earlier, and each one improved on the process a bit as they went. It's pretty obvious that including little voting mechanisms is an obvious next step (they were already popular on sites like Digg). So what benefit does the patent provider here other than to slow down innovation? It's difficult to believe that this "innovation" would not have occurred but for the patent system -- or even that it would have taken longer to happen but for the patent system.

Hopefully, the USPTO quickly dumps this, but just the fact that Facebook and its lawyers felt this was worth patenting shows you something about the ridiculous state of the patent system today.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Richard, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 8:56am

    Then Crowdsource the patent litigation

    Seems to me that for once the public have a say in this - if enough people don't like the patent then they have the power to stop the mechanism from working by sabotaging it.

    The phrase "my hovercraft is full of eels" springs to mind.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:00am

    Re: Then Crowdsource the patent litigation

    How can we possibly stop it? Boycott the use of the idea? That just hinders innovation. Convince the patent office not to patent it? They're unelected (they're appointed), remember, what do they care what the masses want?

    Yet another example of how progress works just fine until patents get in the way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:03am

    People need to understand something. Federal agencies like the USPTO, FDA, FCC, etc... are all appointed, they're not elected directly by the people. As such elected officials get to use them as scapegoats. Elected officials act like they're doing everything right but when big corporations want unethical laws passed they ask elected officials to hire scapegoats to do all the dirty work and people blame the scapegoats instead of the elected officials.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    slogger, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:03am

    https://translations.launchpad.net/
    And I'm there were community sourced translations in the open source world before launchpad even existed...

    Go screw yourself facebook.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    nose hair clipper, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:12am

    can we stop it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Chronno S. Trigger (profile), Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:28am

    Re: Re: Then Crowdsource the patent litigation

    He's talking about screwing with Facebook. Giving false translations and stuff.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 9:36am

    Oh Noes! The good guys are turning into the bad guys! Oh Noes!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), Aug 27th, 2009 @ 10:18am

    How is this even a patentable thing? Applying vote-based crowdsourcing methods to translation... really? What, will there now be a rush to patent "crowdsourcing" every different thing that can be crowdsourced?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    ake, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 10:46am

    Patenting an idea

    I thought it was impossible to patent an idea... only a system?
    I mean, is it possible to patent the idea of "crowdsourced translations"? Is it not just the overall system? In this case, someone might change the inside mechanics of the voting system and distribute it (and eventually put a patent on it ;) )

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Aug 27th, 2009 @ 10:55am

    Buddy?

    Aren't we about due for a good Angry Dude rant, filled with words like "punky" or "lemming", short sound-byte sentences, and semi-thought through logic which is then displaced by vulgarity?

    You out there buddy? I miss your awesomeness...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 11:07am

    Re: Buddy?

    I think we're overdue.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 11:27am

    Re: Buddy?

    He's off with RD sharing the meds. The ranting loons are on both ends of the spectrum here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Aug 27th, 2009 @ 11:33am

    Re: Re: Buddy?

    "The ranting loons are on both ends of the spectrum here."

    Hell yeah they are. Though I suspect I would be considered a "conspiracy loon". Which I'm okay with.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Andrew Calcutt, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 11:34am

    No way is that new

    CrowdSourcing language packs is definitely not something new. Even in my own program (http://www.vistumbler.net), I had my first user submitted language pack on Dec 10th 2007 according to my forum (http://forum.techidiots.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=27&sid=e4b162d9750fbe846655c3f65b7b8aa4). I know I wasn't the first and I won't be the last to do my language packs this way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    B Rose, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 11:53am

    Sorry Facebook, whereistand.com had crowdsourced translation in the public domain in 2005.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    eclecticdave (profile), Aug 27th, 2009 @ 1:11pm

    Re: Patenting an idea

    > I thought it was impossible to patent an idea

    Well, that's the way it *should* work, yes.

    They way these things are actually done is, you submit a patent application describing your specific implementation - then you add a long list of Claims which amount to claiming that every other possible implementation is also covered by your patent.

    Then your typical Patent Examiner rubber-stamps it and waves it through with barely a glance because he has a Quota to fill... (OK, I don't actually *know* that last bit is true, but that's the way it seems sometimes :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    USPTO, Aug 27th, 2009 @ 7:12pm

    Re: Re: Patenting an idea

    Pretty close, we actually get paid by the patents that we review. So like the iPhone app store we just Christmas tree the reviews.... Also, since were all patent lawyers, we know that the more patents we grant (especially the really obvious ones loaded down with prior art) the more business were bound to sink our fangs into once this gig ends. Not to mention, certain law firms hire us in droves in exchange for a wink wink review of anyhing they send across our desk. Hell, I approved a patent application for shoes that was sketched out on a bar napkin last week.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    staff1, Aug 28th, 2009 @ 2:18pm

    stop the shilling!!!

    "I'm confused..."

    Finally, you admit it!!!!! Write about things you know something about, like....well, I don't know. Surely you must know something??

    Patent reform is a fraud on America...
    Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Andrew, Dec 10th, 2010 @ 9:39pm

    http://wlancontroller.com can be used for scanner and access point

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This