RSS
Twitter
Are Canadian Politicians Finally Recogizing There's More Than One Side To Copyright?
from the that-would-be-nice dept
In each of the past few years, facing tremendous pressure from US entertainment industry interests (backed up with blatant lies about the supposed "situation" in Canada), Canadian politicians have introduced draconian copyright reform designed to benefit those Hollywood interests. Luckily the outcry against such rules has been great, and have stopped such bad legislation from getting anywhere. However, there may actually be hope that this year's crop of politicians aren't quite so enamored by the myths Hollywood spread. Michael Geist reports from a recent digital economy conference in Canada where two of the speakers -- the Industry Minister and the Heritage Minister seemed to take a much more reasoned view to these issues. Of particular interest was the talk by Heritage Minister James Moore, seen below. It's only about 5 min long, but the good part starts around 3 minutes:
The average age of a Member of Parliament is 55. And I point that out, only to underline the fact that the average Canadian watches about 26 hours of television a week. Those under the age 25, it's about 12 hours a week. But they're consuming more media than ever before. But, they're consuming it where they want it on their iPhones and on their Blackberries and on their PVRs and on their laptops. And they're doing it through mechanisms that didn't exist.It's great to see some politicians at least having a sense of the opportunity, rather than the "threat" posted by new technologies. Hopefully he can back those statements up when the time comes.
And you'd be surprised the number of Members of Parliament who have never held an iPhone, who couldn't tell you, functionally, how a Blackberry works and have no idea how these things integrate. And when you ask the average member of Parliament "How do you consume your music?" They'll say "well, maybe I'll go out and buy a CD and drop it in the thing or maybe I'll hear something on the radio on the way" and you say "How do you watch movies" and they'll say "Well, I'll go out to the theater when I have the time on a Friday night or maybe rent a DVD at home" and you say "How do you listen to radio or get your news?" and they'll say "Well, I'll sit at 6 o'clock after the meal, finish a steak and watch the news, or get the paper in the morning."
The old way of doing things is over. These things are all now one. And it's great and it's never been better and we need to be enthusiastic and embrace these things.
I point out the average age of a member of parliament because don't assume that those who are making the decisions and who are driving the debate understand all the dynamics that are at play here. Don't assume that everybody understands the opportunities that are at play here and how great this can be for Canada. Tony is doing his job and I'm going to do my job and be a cheerleader and push this and to fight for the right balance as we go forward. The opportunities are unbelievable and unparalleled in human history.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
Who gave him
a $1.00 to buy the clue with
this seems kind of too good to be true
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Politicians?
There's *A* politician who recognizes the fact. It's a start, anyways.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
These are the same type of politicians you have claimed over and over again are brainwashed by the canadian music industry.
Gee.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
So you are saying that the majority of politicians worldwide share Heritage Minister James Moore's views and excitement about technology and copyright?
James himself cautions us by saying that we shouldn't assume those that make the decisions in parliament are informed.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
I cant make heads or tales of what you're trying to say...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
I think he wanted to talk about Michael Jackson and Macaulay Culkin's nefarious night of throwing water balloons onto fans.
But I don't know for sure. Maybe I should seek an answer from MacroZoloft®'s Zing™ Joke Engine. It provides Zingers for Decide. Don't suffer from the Search Overlord©!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re:
How come there's no way to report spam comments like this one?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
These are the same type of politicians you have claimed over and over again are brainwashed by the canadian music industry.
Really? Can you point out where I ever suggested James Moore was brianwashed by the industry?
Thanks.
If not, I assume you'll retract your statement and admit you were wrong, right?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090624/1217025350.shtml
Start there, and trace your way through the 101 links that will generate on your site off that page.
Basically, do the grunt work you tell the rest of us to do all the time.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re:
Start there, and trace your way through the 101 links that will generate on your site off that page.
Uh. Nowhere have I claimed that Canadian politicians are "brainwashed" and even if some were in the pocket of the industry, nowhere have I ever said that Moore was.
Nice try, but really, really weak.
But, I guess you're running out of material now that you're just outright making stuff up these days.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re:
"As expected, Canadian politicians have introduced a much stricter anti-camcording bill that will include jail time (two to five years) for those caught camcording. Michael Geist notes that the bill is on the "fast track" and may not even have any debate before being approved. This seems clearly a case of politicians bowing down to corporate interests (even those outside their own country). No, there's no defense for camcording a movie"
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070604/article_main.php?sid=20070604/010717
Not brainwashed, but I found this nice reference within minutes.
Mike, if you never used the term brainwashed, I apoligize for that choice of words. But you have made it very clear (even in the opening comments of this post) that Canadian politicians have given in to pressure over and over again.
Honestly, you fire wide and randomly all over the place,it is hard to keep track of who you think is brainwashed, who you think is a lackey, and who you think is in who's pocket.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mike, if you never used the term brainwashed, I apoligize for that choice of words. But you have made it very clear (even in the opening comments of this post) that Canadian politicians have given in to pressure over and over again.
Um, they have, as a group, given in to pressure over and over again. That's why it's NOTEWORTHY that a few of them seem to be pushing back. That's the story.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It's OK you're not crazy - I think most of the rest of us understood it quite easily:
Canadian politicians (as a group) have passed some dumb laws (as have US, UK, French.....) but individually there are signs that some of them 'get it'
The fact that at least one of them who 'gets it' is not just a politican but a minister is heartening indeed - perhaps he might even help repeal the blank CD tax
Apparently you can lead some people to water, but you can't make 'em think - I blame FOX 'News'
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not really noteworthy - the conservative government in Canada is a minority government that has almost fallen again this spring, for the second or third time in the last 4 years. Each fall leads to another election.
As a result, the politicians are almost constantly in election mode. At this point, an agreement was made not to make the government fall last month (would have led to a mid-summer election that none of them want), but it is likely the government will get dragged down in the fall.
"new technology" and "new ideas" doesn't mean repealing any of copyright - in fact, in Canada it usually means creating a committee (in this case a pan canadian intergovernmental board) to look at new ideas, come up with framework for those new ideas, and then in the end, to award licenses to exploit those new ideas to the existing monopoly information providers.
Getting it or not getting it really isn't the point - all the nice words are there to make it sound like something is going on, but nothing really is. Remember, our conversion to HDtv isn't until 2011!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
You mean the ones James Moore was talking about that have never used an iPhone? Definitely.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Still don't trust the Conservatives. These are the people who passed a law that sends someone to jail for 2 YEARS MIN. for taping a movie in the theatre. Whatever your feeling about this is, you certainly can't argue that this punishment is fitting. In Canada, sex offenders could serve one year, even less in some cases. The NDP is the only party ready to take on the challenges of the digital age. They are the only ones who stand up for consumer rights and what is fair. The Liberals and the Conservatives are dinosaurs.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Learn to read
some people need to
that is all.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I'm told he went to my high school.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Politicians wanting balance? Is there an election coming up?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
This is Canada - there's ALWAYS an election coming up!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I have to ask who is the junior speech writer who wrote this for him. Maybe they should be in politics or hopefully they soon will be.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Back to the article
How's the over 50 crowd suppose to get clued-in? Not all of us have 10-year olds at home to teach us. And besides, do we want to invest time to learn some new technology that's going to be history in 3 to 6 months anyway? (To emphasize short time spans of any new technologies these days.)
VRP
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment