RSS
EFF Busts Another Bogus Patent... Five Years Later
from the still-taking-quite-a-long-time dept
In writing about ridiculously bad patents, we've seen a trend of commenters insisting that if a patent is truly "bad," then there's no problem, since it will likely get rejected. However, the process of getting a bogus patent rejected is ridiculously long and cumbersome. The EFF is rightfully happy that the USPTO is going to throw out a ridiculous patent on web subdomains, presenting another victory for the EFF's Patent Busting Project. We discussed this specific case earlier this year, when the patent in question received its initial rejection.
While this is certainly a victory against a bad patent, what should be quite worrying is just how long it's taken to get this far. The EFF launched their patent busting project almost five years ago. And while it's had success in getting two patents busted, one significantly narrowed and re-exams on three more, this is an incredibly slow moving process. Yet during that time, such a bogus patent can be used to stop innovation and advancement. That should be seen as quite troubling. Now some may argue that it takes an equally long time to get a patent granted, but that doesn't hold back innovation in the same way. While the patent process is going on, innovation can continue. Yet if a bogus patent is preventing innovation for many years, the harm to society can be great.
13 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- If Google Is Serious About Reforming Patent Mess, It Should Make A Bold Statement And Stop Using Motorola Patents To Demand Cash
- One Reason Why The USPTO Granted Ridiculously Stupid Internet Patents: Patent Examiners Were Banned From Using The Internet
- The Web Is Saved: East Texas Jury Says Eolas Patents Are Invalid
- Copyright Troll Submits Entire Filing About How 'Radical, Quasi-Anarchist' EFF Should Be Blocked From Participating In Case
- Channeling That Anti-SOPA Energy Into Getting Important DMCA Exemptions
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
a bit of perspective
I'm not saying that patents are irrelevant. I am saying, however, that innovation will happen with or without patent laws. It could even be argued that patent laws actually inhibit innovation. How? Well a potential inventor might not follow through with an idea for fear of being sued by someone who came up with that idea already.
So, all you lawyers reading this, especially patent lawyers, think about your impact on innovation BEFORE you think about how much money you can squeeze out of that low-income person whose only REAL crime was to have a good idea!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bogus/Bad patent actionable?
If bad faith can be proven?
And so on..
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hmm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Actually the fact that a lot of time and money are flushed down toilet in the act of pursuing patents is in itself an inefficiency that should be examined.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Until then what EFF is doing by its announcements is little more that premature hype.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Why it does work anyway.
or like someone trying to apply for documents attached to emails, or IM software that sends files tru its protocols, there is stuff that shouldn't be apply-able for now a days.
and i know i got out of the subject a bit but gosh at least EFF is really doing something to stop such nosenses its a shame it takes that damn long to achive such victories.
theres my 2 cents.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: a bit of perspective
Was there anything prior to cuneiform?
Patent lawyers would not have a clue with regards to their actions on innovation.
Not their job.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
One step forward....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Heh. Fascinating. So the EFF shouldn't announce what is accurately happened?
Btw, from your tone, you sure sound like MLS... but if that's the case, I thought you had just said you were going to be using your real name on this site going forward. What happened to that?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
As for premature, I am not saying their releases are inaccurate, only that they are premature because the "fat lady has not sung." For example, a Final Action in a re-exam proceeding is not conclusive. An appeal can be taken. A reissue can be filed for if deemed appropriate. Etc. To me something is "busted" when a patent is invalidated and even a reissue will not save the day by permitting the issuance of narrower claims.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DJ
Also, answer "C" is probably Galileo.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
EFF and patent busting
Won't happen until we have campaign finance reform, though - too many politicians could not survive without massive infusions of cash (and wouldn't be wealthy, as well).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment