RSS
Obama Administration Reiterates Its Support Of Secretive, Industry Written ACTA
from the this-is-a-problem dept
We've been bothered by the incredibly secretive (except if you happen to be in the entertainment industry) ACTA Treaty negotiations for quite some time now. This is the industry-led effort to get a bunch of nations to agree to draconian and damaging new copyright laws by sneaking them through as a secretive "international treaty," such that countries are then compelled to change their copyright laws to "be in compliance with international agreements." It's a really sneaky trick that Hollywood has used for years. And then it acts all innocent when people accuse it of pushing draconian laws on consumers, claiming "it wasn't us... we needed to be in compliance with our international agreements." They just leave out the part where they're the ones who write those agreements for the various trade representatives. The early drafts of ACTA are no different. They were clearly written by industry lobbyists, and are now being pushed by various trade representatives, and then our elected officials will have "no choice" but to change copyright laws to be in compliance.
Perhaps the most troubling part of all of this is that the negotiations are happening in secret, and when consumers rights organizations ask to be given a seat at the table, they're denied. When those same consumer rights organizations ask to at least be told what's being negotiated, they're told it's forbidden because of "state secrets." However, for all that national security, the administration has absolutely no problem giving industry lobbyists access to the process. Funny how that works.
Either way, it should come as no surprise that Michael Geist alerts us to the news that the US Trade Rep, Ron Kirk, is eager to get ACTA moving forward again. In response to all that secrecy, he claims:
In the meantime, Kirk claims:
Isn't that a problem?
Perhaps the most troubling part of all of this is that the negotiations are happening in secret, and when consumers rights organizations ask to be given a seat at the table, they're denied. When those same consumer rights organizations ask to at least be told what's being negotiated, they're told it's forbidden because of "state secrets." However, for all that national security, the administration has absolutely no problem giving industry lobbyists access to the process. Funny how that works.
Either way, it should come as no surprise that Michael Geist alerts us to the news that the US Trade Rep, Ron Kirk, is eager to get ACTA moving forward again. In response to all that secrecy, he claims:
As we proceed with these negotiations, we will ensure that the public is kept well informed and has further opportunities to give input.Of course, the next meeting will take place in Morocco. How many consumer representatives will be there?
In the meantime, Kirk claims:
"The ACTA negotiations provide an opportunity to toughen international standards for the enforcement of intellectual property rights, making it harder for counterfeit and pirated products to enter our country, and making the world safer for the innovation and creativity that are so critical to the U.S. economy."But... wait. Is it really true that this is a big problem? Both the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have taken a close look at the numbers thrown around about the "problem" of counterfeiting, and found them to be wildly overblown by lobbyists -- the same lobbyists writing ACTA, not surprisingly. So why is the US Trade Rep agreeing to let this go forward? It's not about "making the world safer for the innovation and creativity." It's about granting special protection to a few powerful US industries with lobbyists.
Isn't that a problem?
I have an app...
Developer Census: Be Counted. It takes less than two minutes.
Top 5 Reasons Why Mobile Analytics Is Important
I have a business...
The Talent Wars: Today's Toughest Startup Challenge
Why and How Developers Use Mobile Payments: Infographic
I have an idea...
Securing Venture Capital for that Next App Development
Finding Co-Founders in a Recovering Economy
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
More proof that these laws aren't designed to benefit (and they don't benefit) the general public. They're designed to benefit industry.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Transparent? Not!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Further?
Did we have any opportunities to give input?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Transparent? Not!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
government without you
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And dont expect him to actually "care" what the people think.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Courts
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Kirk
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
all about money
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: all about money
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: all about money
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
DOJ littered with RIAA lawyer scum
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DOJ littered with RIAA lawyer scum
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Surprise Suprise
So much Hope and Change.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment