When the Bilski
decision came out, we said that it would greatly limit software patents
, but various patent system defenders (mostly lawyers) insisted that I was wrong and most software was still perfectly patentable
. Basically, they said it just meant everyone had to write claims differently, and we'd have just as many software patents as before. Listening to them (there was a hilarious conference call of lawyers insisting this was nothing to worry about), it sounded like they were in serious denial, claiming the only patent this ruling would lead to being rejected was the Bilski patent -- all others would be fine. Things aren't actually turning out that way, however, with a much more aggressive rejection of software claims
than those lawyers insisted would happen. This is a good sign... though now we get to wait to see if the Bilski ruling is appealed to the Supreme Court
: No waiting necessary... should have checked the wires before posting this, because, indeed, Bilski has been appealed
. Will have more on this later...