RIAA May Get Its Wish: Pandora Leaning Towards Shutting Down Over Webcasting Royalties

from the how-the-RIAA-killed-internet-radio dept

Last year, we noted that the new webcasting royalty rates pushed through by the RIAA appeared designed specifically to kill internet radio. These royalties are different and much higher than things like traditional and satellite radio, despite being much more fragile at this point in their development. As if to prove the point, Pandora, one of the largest and most successful online streaming radio providers is now saying that it's going to have to shut down if the royalty rates aren't changed shortly.

This is exactly what the RIAA wants, by the way. Even if services like Pandora introduce people to tons of music (personally, I've bought a ton of music I found on Pandora), much of that music is not from an RIAA-member label. The RIAA knew exactly what it was doing in pushing these higher rates: it was killing off alternative routes to promoting non-RIAA music. The RIAA labels have always thrived off a very limited distribution and promotion channel. After all, distribution and promotion are where record labels really make their money. Competing methods of distribution and promotion are threats to be killed off -- and the RIAA may have succeeded here (with Congress' and the courts' help, of course).

Oh, and don't think the solution is to only play non-RIAA music. The RIAA's spinoff, SoundExchange, gets to collect money on non-RIAA music as well. Oh yeah, it gets better too: if SoundExchange can't find the musicians to pay, it gets to keep the money. That's why it has a history of not looking very hard for musicians in order to pay them.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    bob, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:13am

    screw the music industry

    Pandora is the best thing to happen to the music industry since radio.
    If they kill it I'll do my part to drive the industry into the ground for good.
    I'll make sure I never legally purchase another piece of music again.
    I'll also do my best to encourage everyone I know to do the same.
    It will be unfortunate for the musicians, but RIAA and their peers need to die a cold hard death so this industry can have a new start.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:18am

    I wonder what would happen if the head(s) of the RIAA were to suddenly disappear?

    Would the RIAA disappear in a disjointed puff of asinine idiocracy?

    Or would new heads appear?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:31am

    SoundExchange

    The SoundExchange monopoly on royalty collection seems to be a crucial point in this whole saga - why has more not been made of this and the surrounding issues and legislation?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:32am

    Re: screw the music industry

    That's not the right response. The right respose is what we should be doing already: avoiding RIAA member lables and promoting new/innovative/independant artists. Is there a convenient place one can go to see what artists are on which lables?

    There's no reason musicians need to suffer as the lables crash.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:55am

    I no longer feel bad about downloading music on p2p. I listen to Pandora a lot and enjoy it very much.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:16am

    Re: Re: screw the music industry

    But how do we find the new/innovative/independent artists? If Pandora goes away, then who will promote them? Isn't anything resembling Pandora for non-RIAA artists still web radio? And furthermore, what's the difference between the RIAA and SoundExchange? Nothing, as I see it. Therefore, I won't buy any music, from any artist, ever again. Easily done. But I will download for free to my heart's content. Even easier.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    hegemon13, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:23am

    Re: Re: screw the music industry

    "Is there a convenient place one can go to see what artists are on which lables?"

    Don't know about that, but eMusic seems to be a good place to find music from independent artists at a reasonable price.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    AveryTingWong, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:26am

    Wow you have got to be kidding. The only music I EVER buy is off Pandora, when I hear something I really like, I pick it up. RIAA is stepping on a lot of toes here, but it's not like that has stopped them in the past.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Jaypoc, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:27am

    Unbelievable

    I find it amazing that the RIAA continues to dig their own grave. I personally have seen more people turn to piracy because of absurd limitations that legal music downloading imposes on it's customers. High costs, Low availability and technical restrictions such as DRM make legal music downloads/licensing unpalatable.

    People do currently PAY OVER $15/MONTH to services that allow them to download pirated music. If the recording indusry would put their greed aside, they could be making this revenue instead of it going to support illegal music downloads. RIAA, wake up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Adam Singer, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:29am

    As a non-RIAA artist

    This is absolutely horrible news. My music has been played on several internet radio stations and I've never gotten a dime.

    I actually give it out free for promotional purposes...and the RIAA gets to collect on it. The world is a shitty place for independents sometimes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    sandoz76, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:32am

    hearbreaking

    I have little to add here other than this is devastating. Pandora has really been the best thing on the internet for me.

    RIAA has done so much to stifle creativity and innovation in music.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Hovis, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:37am

    Re: Re: screw the music industry

    Hey, I don't know where to find that, but if someone wants to toss it together I just registered briaa.net for that purpose. I may find the time to set that up myself - but if someone else wants to do the hard work and boycott the RIAA I'll give you the domain. I just don't want some squatter snatching it up. (like briaa.com)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    icon
    David (profile), Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:46am

    Web Radio vs Web Site

    AC @6 has a good point. What exactly is RIAA's definition of a "Web Radio station"

    Wikipedia defines it as "a streaming medium that presents listeners with a continuous "stream" of audio over which they have no control, much like traditional broadcast media; in this respect, it is distinct from "on-demand" file serving"

    So if Pandora offered some sort of audience interaction, maybe Last-FM style track skipping, would it be off the hook?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Collin, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:50am

    Re: Re: screw the music industry

    There is RIAA Radar.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Greg, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:52am

    here's hoping...

    the riaa dies quickly. It's inevitable, since they don't provide any value anymore, (and don't seem to want to try) but they seem determined to make everyone feel their pain as they go. Pandora is an amazing service. The only new music I've found in the last few years has been through Pandora and Last.fm.

    Musicians please avoid RIAA labels! Promote your music through free internet services and kill off the RIAA parasites.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), Aug 18th, 2008 @ 11:59am

    Grr

    I know it is technically the law that SoundExchange gets to collect on non-RIAA member songs royalties, but something has to be done to change that.
    Since congress has been bought out in this regard, ALL internet radio should boycott the paying of ANYTHING for non-RIAA member's songs. Why pay royalties on something to somebody who has absolutely less than nothing to do with it?
    If they all did it in unison, maybe congress would wake up, just a tiny, if we are lucky. I know I am hoping and asking for too much, but sometimes the people have to stand up for whats right when its pushed too far.

    If they all banded together, the industry could try to sue, and the officials could go after them. Then let us see the outcry of the public about how stupid these laws are once tons of attention is drawn to them beyond just our tech savvy crew.

    I know, I am way too optimistic sometimes.

    If Pandora goes down, my thoughts are perfectly in line with the first poster here. I will do everything I can to see the RIAA die as soon as possible, including marketing against them to my friends who buy lots of music.
    I have found lots of good music on Pandora. Yes, I do not buy it all, but I do buy some. And that some would have never been found without Pandora I am sure simply because it is not RIAA tripe.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    Mogilny, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:00pm

    Pandora is silly

    Pandora has nothing to offer at the bargaining table. If RIAA doesn't want internet radio, then threatening to shut down is a just a desperate attempt to stir the public. The problem with this plan is that the public has absolutely no influence over RIAA's actions, absolutely nothing.

    Pandora needs to go back to the drawing board and think of a new business plan. Yes, you just got kick in the nuts. Don't just cry about it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Hovis, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:02pm

    savenetradio.org

    Guess what people? This is the USA, and we have the right to decide what happens in our country. Comment 12 provides a link which I will repeat: savenetradio.org

    This site is dedicated to preventing the death of internet radio. You can help by calling your Senators and Representative and telling them how much bullshit this is, and how much internet radio means to you.

    If you go to that site, they'll make it easy and GIVE YOU THE PHONE NUMBER of the people that need to hear you.

    If you don't make yourself heard and do something about this, then you need to stop complaining because you apparenty DON'T care enough.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Tony, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:05pm

    Re: As a non-RIAA artist

    Maybe you and the other non-RIAA artists who the RIAA is claiming to "collect" for should get together and go after the RIAA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:05pm

    they probably know they are going to die for sure so they are trying to extract as much money from our pockets before we realize they are all a bunch of thugs and change laws accordingly. They will bribe as many politicians as possible to get them to pass insane laws/treaties (i.e. ACTA) that only serve to make these companies richer, not benefit the country/humanity.

    it is classic governmental/corporate corruption that only serves themselves at the expense of everyone else.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:07pm

    Re: Re: Re: screw the music industry

    How do we find them? Word of mouth. You find a cool non-RIAA band, you tell your friends, post it on a blog, send a Tweet, whatever. It's the Internet, man. Same thing if you find such-and-such band is working for the RIAA. That way we can boycott the RIAA with the least fallout against artists as possible. Hurting the artists because their lables suck is dumb. (But you can boycott U2, Bono's a certified ass.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Charlie Potatoes, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:09pm

    Boycott?

    Ok, not to offend music lovers, but we aren't talking about food or shelter, our car, or even gasoline for it. Music is hardly a basic necessity of life. Why not just go for a month or even six months without buying one single tune?...nothing. Surely the buying public can make it rain longer than RIAA can tread water. To hell with someone who screws me. I simply don't do business with them. Can't we give up new tunes for a very short period of time? All this whining seems a little juvenile to me. I mean we ain't talking bout the Sex or Beer industry. Just screw em... Stop buying their overpriced product...and stop writing about it. damn.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    elduderino, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:10pm

    cry cry

    this makes me sad sad I think I'll /wrists if pandora goes down

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:13pm

    Re: Pandora is silly

    The only thing wrong with your view is this: It isn't up to the RIAA to decide what businesses succeed, and which don't. And I believe the public gets to vote with their wallets, which every poster here (you being the sole exception), seems ready and willing to do.

    We can only assume you are one of the soulless RIAA shills.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:16pm

    The real problem is the compulsory rate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:25pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: screw the music industry

    I really meant "how can I hear the music to even find out if I like it?"

    And sorry if the artists suffer collateral damage, but if they don't like it, maybe they should find a different organization to align with. I'm not going to waste my time trying to make the distinction between the RIAA and the artists. I'm also not going to try to distinguish between which are RIAA artists and which aren't, because the ones that aren't are covered by SoundExchange, which I find just as revolting as the RIAA. So the only option left, to avoid supporting organizations that I find immoral and ethically repugnant, is to simply not buy music at all. I might pick up some stuff at a garage sale or on eBay, but I won't buy any music from any retailer on this planet.

    But I will happily download whatever I that I like.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    MissingFrame, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:28pm

    Can't we just ignore the RIAA?

    Why can't Pandora simply play non-RIAA music? Can the RIAA still collect royalties? Since we are boycotting the RIAA anyway, lets just completely ignore any music that has RIAA stains on it and let them wither.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:32pm

    Hoist them with thier own petard.

    I can give away my own music, but someone else can't give it away by streaming it?

    Here's an idea for a lawsuit foundation case:
    Set up a streaming channel that just loops a single track of very bad (or good if you have it in you) music that you compose and record about the extortion racket that SoundExchange truly is and how you the artist specifically denies SoundEx the right to represent this performance in any manner. The verbal content of the song is a legal notice of rights restriction.

    When SoundExchange comes to enforce the compulsory license collection, tell them to pound sand and copy the EFF.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    BillDem, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:37pm

    Boycott the RIAA - website

    Here is the website for boycotting the RIAA. It has lots of great information:
    http://www.boycott-riaa.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    devilnis, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:38pm

    Typical RIAA BS

    This is the exact kind of thing they've been doing for years to maintain their stranglehold on the music industry. When you hear the presidential candidates talk about lobbyists for special interests, well the RIAA is the prototype model for that kind of lawmaking.

    Eventually Pandora will probably die, leaving a market niche that will be filled by an RIAA approved entity whose profits will be going to line the same ol' pockets. Oh well, life isn't fair. Hopefully SoundExchange will do a decent implementation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:44pm

    BOYCOTT THE RIAA!

    Not 1 cent!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    BillDem, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:45pm

    Scripts to find non-RIAA artists on Amazon.com

    This site contains information and links to scripts that will let you search Amazon.com albums for non-RIAA releases.

    http://www.riaaradar.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Keith, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:49pm

    KEEP IT UP RIAA, The whole world is watching!

    Yeah! Not 1 cent! I agree!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    BillDem, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:53pm

    Track their litigation here

    Here is a web site which exposes the details of their legal and legislative actions on an ongoing basis.

    http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/

    In a nutshell, WE need to stop them. Nobody else can or will do it.

    How?

    STOP BUYING RIAA MUSIC. Let's bury them in their own stupidity.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Mogilny, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:54pm

    Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    Do you think the general public will think about the poor internet radio industry when they go buy tunes off itunes or in a HMV? Most likely not. I'm willing to bet that most people who listen to internet radio don't buy as much music as the avg. population.

    If there are so many loyal supporter out there, are they willing to pay a small subscription fee? Maybe Pandora should start generating content, self generated content is a fixed cost, unlike music where you have to pay more royalty for more users and more often its play.

    RIAA are extortionists. I hate them probably as much as you do. But the RIAA is Pandora's only supplier and internet radio is small business to the RIAA. I just think Pandora needs to do something at their end before crying to the public about it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Keybored, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 12:58pm

    A real travesty

    I'm sorry to hear this news. Pandora is an awesome project. I too listen fairly often and yes have gone out to locate and purchase some of the songs I've heard.

    Remember this old adage? Maybe I'm showing my age but it's exactly what the RIAA is doing and it is a bog load of crap:

    Work the system and the system will work for you. Good work RIAA, YOU'VE GOT IT DOWN TO A SCIENCE...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:01pm

    Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    The RIAA is not Pandora's only supplier, since there are plenty of independent artists. But the point is that it was the RIAA that demanded the obscene royalties, even if SoundExchange is collecting most of them.

    Please explain why Internet radio is any different than satellite or terestrial radio? Why should web-based radio pay more for the same thing?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    Jim, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:04pm

    Re: As a non-RIAA artist

    Why not get your money from SoundExchange? The system does suck, but may as well get your money out of their wallet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    Jim, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:11pm

    Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    "Maybe Pandora should start generating content..."

    You miss the point. All songs played require a fee to SoundExchange. According to the law, even if Pandora DID generate their own content they would STILL have to pay up. All music that streams must have royalties that go to SoundExchange.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Mogilny, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:15pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    Music is only one type of content. There are others. Copy a page from satellite radio where they incorporated talk shows, tv shows, as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    shotsie, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:16pm

    Need to get China Involved

    We need to sell Pandora to the Chinese, then challenge RIAA to try to bill that stream. Can we easily state that intellectual property rights mean nothing to the Chinese? Good luck with marketing that new Britney album in China....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    rob, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:17pm

    Re: screw the music industry

    bob - i couldn't have put it better. you rule. im so following exactly what you said. Pandora is the greatest thing. RIAA must die.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    identicon
    Damien, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:27pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    That still wouldn't fix the problem and you bloody well know it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    identicon
    Mogilny, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:30pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    Yes, there is indie music as well. But, you still have to deal with SoundExchange/RIAA.

    There is no reason. RIAA is not going to play nice. Pandora needs to deal with it. That's business.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:31pm

    what needs to be done is boycott the RIAA back to the stone age!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    identicon
    Mogilny, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    ... and crying to the public for sympathy will?!?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    identicon
    Johnny Soundtrack, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Re: screw the music industry

    Reverb Nation is run by a few friends of mine and they are doing a good job at getting independent musicians and fans together

    http://www.reverbnation.com/

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    anonymous, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 2:28pm

    Change the market to shut out RIAA

    I dont understand all of the nuances of this issue, however, it seems to me that if the online radio companies used independent artists (vs RIAA artists), people would have more exposure to said independent artists and redirect their purchasing dollars in that direction. This will have the double effect of avoioding the insane royalties, and eroding the market for RIAA artists. I suppose it makes the best of a bad situation.

    The real shame of all this is that it was allowed to happen in the first place. Our polititians are unquestionalbly corrupt if they support the RIAA's rhetoric. The government is supposed to help the people, not help companies kick other companies in the head, or help them to pick our pockets.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    eleete, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 5:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    "Well Brian looks like your not doing any business"

    TBC

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    eleete, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 5:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    "Well Brian looks like your not doing any business"

    TBC

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    identicon
    eleete, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 5:48pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    Sorry for the triple post, should have read...

    "Well Brian, looks like you're not doing any business"

    TBC

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    identicon
    Griper, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 7:22pm

    Correct me if I'm wrong

    Odds are I'm wrong but if the only game in town is the RIAA/SoundExchange but wouldn't that constitute an anti-trust issue? They seem to be pretty obvious about squeezing out the promotion/distribution competitors.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    identicon
    Robert C., Aug 18th, 2008 @ 8:25pm

    Subscribe to Pandora

    One other thing we could do, which nobody seemed to suggest is simply subscribe to Pandora's paid service. It's pretty cheap and there's no ads. You just pay once a year and that's it. It also makes you feel warm and fuzzy that you may. Be contributing to their survival.
    By the way, I'm not from Pandora or associated with them in any way. Just thight I'd make it clear.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    identicon
    deathspeed, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 8:43pm

    drive soundexchange to bankruptcy?

    Maybe techdirt readers should take it upon themselves to contact every artist on the soundexchange unpaid artists list, to let them know that soundexchange is hoarding i mean safeguarding their money. I've already sent a few emails to bands whose music i have and whose web presence i could find, but the list is too long for me to hit them all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    identicon
    Pjerky, Aug 18th, 2008 @ 10:21pm

    The RIAA is illegal!

    I find it amazing that the RIAA hasn't be brought up on charges of racketeering, anti-trust, and larceny yet. What they are doing is highly illegal. First, even if you are not a member of the RIAA, their collection organization, SoundExchange, has the "right" to collect fees for your music being played. And they don't have to give you the money they collect until after you have proven ownership of the music and have paid for membership into their organization.

    Essentially forcing all music to be paid for, irregardless of whether or not the copyright owners want the music to be paid for or not.

    The only solution for this is a two-fold solution. First of all for everyone everywhere to only listen to non-RIAA music and secondly for the organizations and individuals that play said music to refuse to give a dime to SoundExchange. If enough of us refuse, which is very easy not only morally and ethically, but also would be easy to win legally in the long run (no jury would side against you on this).

    Refuse to pay the RIAA!
    The RIAA are nothing but a bunch of wallet-raping terrorists.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    MadJo (profile), Aug 19th, 2008 @ 1:09am

    Re: Re: As a non-RIAA artist

    Because, afaik, you have to pay to get access to your money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 4:47am

    Re: Can't we just ignore the RIAA?

    That's part of the problem: they do play a lot of non-RIAA music, but by law SoundExchange collects royalties "for" independant artists. So the fees stand.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    icon
    Killer_Tofu (profile), Aug 19th, 2008 @ 5:23am

    Re: The RIAA is illegal!

    Exactly. Just refuse to pay SoundExchange for anything not from the labels. I know the law says otherwise, but what better way to call lots of attention to it, than to ignore it and cause a big stink about it.

    If they get smacked down with large fines, they will just go out of business anyways, so it is not like they would be losing all that much compared to what they stand to lose right now (depending on what type of corporation it is set up as, some setups state that for a companies actions, you cannot go after the owner's assets).

    Realistically, what have they got to lose? A couple of servers that they could smash to bits before handing them over?

    Sometimes what is law is not what is right. And sometimes it is better to stand up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 8:11am

    Its all they have . . .

    The only thing a large record can really offer an artists (besides usery lending) is radio air play. Radio airplay is so centralized its very easy for big money players to have an extrememly large effect on what gets aired. Decentralizing that market would weaken the only real advantage a large record company can offer an artist.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 8:16am

    Re: Change the market to shut out RIAA

    "The government is supposed to help the people"

    Not in America, the Government is to create as conducive an environment as possible for Business, thats it. The hope then is that business will take of the people . . .

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    identicon
    CM, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 8:23am

    "Sometimes you have to break the law - to live by the law."

    -- Rebecca Riots

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 2:27pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pandora is silly

    Pandora is dealing with it, probably by shutting down.

    On the other hand, people are having their say about it too. That's free speech. Deal with it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2008 @ 2:43pm

    Re: savenetradio.org

    Guess what people? This is the USA, and we have the right to decide what happens in our country.
    That all depends on how much money you have.
    You can help by calling your Senators and Representative and telling them how much bullshit this is, and how much internet radio means to you.
    You better send them lots of money first if you want them to care.
    If you don't make yourself heard and do something about this, then you need to stop complaining because you apparenty DON'T care enough.
    Like I said, if you really care and want to be heard you better send them lots of money. Oh, and never vote for a Republican or a Democrat. Too many members of both those parties support whoever gives them the most money (RIAA in this case).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    identicon
    Nick, Jul 14th, 2009 @ 8:50pm

    Re: screw the music industry

    I will do the same

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    identicon
    music, Feb 10th, 2010 @ 2:13am

    Hi!
    Pandora radio is not available in my country - Portugal.
    I have found tv243.com a great alternative for it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    identicon
    anon RIAA hater, Aug 24th, 2010 @ 1:04am

    Re: Re: Re: screw the music industry

    http://www.riaaradar.com/

    RIAA Rader will tell you if an artist/compilation etc is linked to the RIAA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This