RSS
If People Actually Hate Your Product And Say So, That's Not A Trademark Violation
from the just-so-you-know... dept
Back in December, we wrote about a company that was selling a product it claimed would provide you with a facelift in an hour. Not surprisingly, many people weren't impressed with the results of such a product (which was advertised widely on TV) and wrote about it on such sites as InfomercialScams.com. The company behind the product proceeded to sue InfomercialScams claiming trademark infringement. There were just a few problems with this. First, having someone critique your product is not a trademark violation -- it's protected free speech. Second, even if it were a trademark violation, it would be a violation by the person writing the review, not the website service provider. It appears that the facelift-in-a-box company hasn't quite learned that lesson as it's now also threatening yet another site that has negative reviews of the product. That site has responded by pointing out that the original lawsuit appears to be a misuse of trademark law, and then also countersues claiming that the company broke the site's terms of service. The countersuit seems like a stretch from a legal standpoint (and, even if the terms of service are violated, it's not clear that it's a matter that raises to the level of a lawsuit), but it's good to see yet another site fighting back against an abuse of trademark law.
25 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Variety Drops Its Insane Lawsuit Against The Band The Vandals
- Disney And Warner Bros. Prepare To Fight Over Who Owns The Public Domain Wizard Of Oz
- Shattering pyrex To Show A Massive Weakness In Trademark Law
- Hey Advertisers! Stop Believing The NFL's Lies About Trademark Law And Call The Super Bowl The Super Bowl
- Jenzabar Continues To Try To Censor Criticism Via Trademark Bullying
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
First
These are the frivilous lawsuits that should be thrown out of court, and the company fined for wasting the courts tim.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
FIRST!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
AT&T - SUCKS
HP - SUCKS
DELL - SUCKS
And many more -
Sue ME!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Most other companies I know, just shrug it off.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
RE: SilverSliver
Better yet, discorporate the company. Destroy it utterly.
Too many companies simply put court fines in the "expenses" side of their balance sheet and keep doing what they were doing before.
Fines work to deter the behavior of individuals when they cause financial ruin, fines typically don't work on corporations with much deeper pockets.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
have a little compassion
it's hard enough to find morons to scam in the middle of the night without the internets exposing their secrets all over the place. cut these guys a little slack... they're just trying to protect their god-given right to lie to people for profit.
besides, trademark is pretty much the only legal tool they have. "our crap doesn't actually work" doesn't hold much weight as a trade secret.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
All the resources and money wasted instead of being invested in r&d. It feels like there's really something wrong with the way businesses are run.
I'm sure there's legitimate cases, but I'm pretty sure there's a lot of bogus SCO's like cases. I don't know, not being a specialist in the matter may affect my comprehension on the subject.
Strange world we live in...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: RE: SilverSliver
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Are lawyers trying to take over the world or something? ;)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Misuse of Trademark
The Church of $cientology also uses trademark infringement claims to pull auctions from eBay for E-Meters (the $25 worth of plastic and electronics that is really just a wheatstone bridge and skin galvanometer) that the Church sells for $5500, but that they don't want any ex/non-$cientologist to be able to sell/buy.
What makes this outright abuse of trademark law is that the Cof$ allows auctions of E-Meters on eBay if the seller is a current $cientologist, and if they promise to sell it only to another $cientologist.
www.xenu.net
www.enturbulation.org
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Most other companies I know, just shrug it off.
They are sensitive about it because it's 3 am, and they can't sleep because they have hot flashes, or something else. DON'T LAUNCH THE NUKES HILLARY!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A deliberate Streisand effect?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
ha
How can people possibly think that a product like that could work? I take that back. People drink their own urine for youth.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Just sue Techdirt to get their name and then sue them. Problem is techdirt will probably sue me and then I'll sue you...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I think so Computer science professor Matt Blaze critiques a recent New Yorker profile of Michael McConnell, the man who is leading the Bush administration's charge for more warrantless wiretapping powers.......thank
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
444
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment