Hands-Free Cellular In Cars: Patented
from the sarcasm-the-whole-post-through dept
Johnson Controls, a leading provider of automotive sub-systems, has been granted a patent for a "Wireless Communication System That Enables 'Hands-free' Cellular Phone Use in Automobiles." Laws requiring hands-free driving are already enforced in a few jurisdictions, and are set to hit California in July of this year. With these laws, it's nice to know that a method for using Bluetooth as a hands-free conduit to the car's embedded radio and speakers is a patented idea. This way, we can be assured that the quality of implemented solutions is maintained, and that the inventors of this innovative idea are duly rewarded (in perpetuity) for their toil. With this legalized monopoly on Hands-Free car integration, Johnson Controls will now have the financial incentive to focus on the important inventions of tomorrow. Some may argue that a Bluetooth hands-free link is obvious, and doesn't merit a patent. Others will ask silly questions like "Isn't that what Bluetooth was supposed to do from its inception (prior to this patent filing) and later standardization?" But these oppositionazis are mistaken: this patent is "based on a patent application originally filed in the United States in 1999," back when nobody else could have ever conceived of using the car stereo and speakers for hands-free phone calls. The only reason we find this idea obvious today is because we have been exposed to the 1999 patent application, which fully revealed the brilliant invention to us... well, not entirely since the 1999 application was more vague and general, and this patent was actually just based on it and modified from 2000-2002. Wow. Hands-free through the car speakers. What will they think of next?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Look for my next patent
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Look for my next patent
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I wonder..
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Next in line:
I'm still waiting for someone to patent the patent system!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Wireless Communication System that Enables Hands Free Coomunications between Vehicle Passengers"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
patent-ly absurd
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Even 1999 the patent was an old idea
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Driver Communication Device
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I did this in the 70's
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Finally
Finally, someone with some sense at Techdirt! After all the outrageous patent bashing done by Mike, it's good to see this Derek Kerton person recognize the true value of the patent system. Kudos!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Finally
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Have they thought of this?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Finally
Do I really have to put in tags?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
My favorite line from TFA.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Proposed Patent
I think this patent has a pretty good chance of surviving. What? Prior art? You don't say...
Anyway, this doesn't prevent people from using any other method of remote control, other than bluetooth. One could use 2.4 Ghz, infrared, or EKG readings (some sort of telepathic control comes to mind) in order to signal the machine to call.
Also, there is a large voice-and-speech recognition component in there, with the microphone "in the overhead console". One could conceivably patent a similar system which uses a different speech recognition system, or microphone anywhere but the overhead console. The possibilities are endless.
I bet someone just pirates this and sells the machines in China for 1/10th the price. I'm hitting up eBay in about 3 months. I'll get me an iClone along the way.
Just don't pay Johnson Controls their royalty. They obviously deserve however many pennies they get for this little gem.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re #16
It is kind of funny. =D
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
idea alread existed prior to 1999
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
video converter for mac
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
mac
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
mac
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment