Politics

Politics

by Carlo Longino


Filed Under:
congress, isps, taxes



Internet Access Tax Ban Up For Renewal Again, But The Push To Make It Permanent Remains

from the doing-some-good-for-a-change dept

We've noted in the past how every once in a while, some good internet laws turn up, even though they're still far outweighed by the bad ones. One of the good laws has been the moratorium on taxes on internet service, which keep states from increasing the total cost of internet access for consumers. The only hiccup, though, is that this ban has never been made permanent, mostly thanks to the objections of the states. The current moratorium expires November 1, and discussions to extend it or make it permanent are ongoing. While there's bipartisan support for keeping internet access bills free from the morass of taxes and regulatory recovery fees that plague telephone and cable TV bills, a lobbying group representing the states say they current ban should only be extended temporarily, so that legislators can "return to this issue and make sure we've gotten it right." It's not entirely clear why they can't "get it right" now, particularly as two bills that would make the ban permanent have already been introduced in the House. What's heartening about the discussion, though, is that it seems to focus on legislators' desire to make the ban more broad, potentially covering backbone services and even basic cable. For the time being, the worst-case scenario appears to be that the taxes are banned for four more years, but it looks like there's too much momentum behind the ban eventually becoming permanent to stop it at this point.

4 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. Jul 27th, 2007 @ 2:06pm

    truly hidden fees are "better" anyhow

    by discojohnson

    i think that as long as i get a bill that is more or less flat without regulatory fees added on is best. they may need a USF-type fee put on it, but it's part of the 39.99 i'm being billed, the way it *should* be. if you need more money to support the infrastructure, then charge more! don't lie to me by tacking on another $15/mo in extra fees (see also: power companies)

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  2. Jul 27th, 2007 @ 2:11pm

    What a bummer...

    by Anonymous Coward

    That does suck when you see that $15/mn on your bill and it is listed at "Fees and Services". What fees and services?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  3. Jul 27th, 2007 @ 2:32pm
    by 500CID

    No thanks.. if passed, I'll cancel service...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  4. Jul 30th, 2007 @ 5:41am

    Re:

    by Anonymous Coward

    So, you like to pay extra taxes? or are you a moron?

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It