(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick




Is The Market For Security Vulnerabilities A Good Thing?

from the government's-open-for-business dept

It used to be that security researchers would often reveal security vulnerabilities as a way to build their name and get some attention. However, with so many cases of that backfiring and having the messenger blamed, it appears that the growing trend is for those who find vulnerabilities to simply sell them for thousands of dollars -- with the U.S. government being a prominent purchaser. Researchers can also sell the vulnerabilities to security companies or (of course) questionable black market contacts -- though, most ethical security researchers want to make sure whoever they sell the vulnerability to is going to inform the company that makes the software. Of course, the whole concept of "selling vulnerabilities" seems vaguely extortionist, as the implicit threat is that if the government doesn't buy it, the researcher always could sell it to those with less than noble intentions. At the same time, though, it is odd to hear security researchers complain that it's tough to sell to the government because it's not easy to find the right contacts -- as if the government buyers should more readily advertise themselves.

6 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Jun 4th, 2007 @ 9:50am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    The real problem with this is only: what used to be a noble, academic pursuit is not sullied with the taint of money and lower motives. OK Fine, if thats how its going to be (as it inevitably must) then let us deal with it appropriately--clear and unambiguous bug bounties. Without that degree of certainty, those who feel as if theyre entitled to a bounty will get it, one way or another--thus the extortion.

    That will hold us for a while until the value of these exploits gets bid way up. Heres to hoping the supply of bugs can continue to expand and keep prices low.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 4th, 2007 @ 11:16am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    What's to stop them from selling to both the government and the black market, I know I would.. double dip the pen in both ink wells.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Jun 4th, 2007 @ 11:39am
    • Re:

      by Anonymous Coward

      Honour among hackers, my friend. Professional standards. Industrial hacking is respectable, as is friendly whitehat hacking for government. Betraying both will be appreciated by neither.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Jun 4th, 2007 @ 1:10pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Honour amoung hackers. Tell the Estonians about it...

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 4th, 2007 @ 2:00pm
  • by Anonymous Coward

    There's an interesting paper on this very problem that just got published in one of the Yale Law School journals: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=960239

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

  • Jun 6th, 2007 @ 12:32am
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Makes me wonder about all the ones sold exclusively to Uncle Sam. What sort of spying is being perpetrated against ordinary citizens? "Magic Lantern" is just the beginning.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It