Top Spammer Arrested... But Will It Matter?

from the probably-not dept

While both Microsoft and an ISP have won multi-million dollar judgments against Robert Alan Soloway for spamming, he apparently kept on spamming. This time around, he might not have it so easy. Rather than a civil case from a company, he's now been arrested for sending out millions of spam emails over a zombie network he put together -- and it looks like the feds threw everything they could think of against him: mail fraud, wire fraud, e-mail fraud, aggravated identity theft and money laundering. Apparently, the identity theft part was for "taking over someone's domain" (though, it's not clear here if they mean falsifying an email address or for the zombie network). Either way, it's hard to believe that this will really have much of an impact. After all, other spammers have been arrested (and jailed) before and it's not like the spam has gone down. So it seems a bit ridiculous for the federal authorities who are going after the guy to claim that people should see the amount of spam they receive start going down due to this arrest. Someone else will simply step in and fill the gap pretty quickly.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Hoeppner, May 31st, 2007 @ 3:48am

    but the gap is less attractive to fill.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Jaz, May 31st, 2007 @ 3:49am

    Well it's better than letting him off...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    OleManOz, May 31st, 2007 @ 3:58am

    Stop Spammers

    I suppose that we should not arrest serial killers. After all, someone else will fill that slot, too.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Zwxphtt, May 31st, 2007 @ 4:05am

    Exactly

    That's why I never do anything at work. Someone will eventually do it for me.
    Zwx

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Dexter, May 31st, 2007 @ 4:07am

    move it offshore!

    It will just get outsourced to China or Russia or somewhere the feds have no clout.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    nunya_bidness, May 31st, 2007 @ 4:18am

    Consumer Education

    Maybe Microsoft could use that money to create a program that would help educate the users it helped create. How many people have infected computers because they are so removed from the system they do not even know things like this are possible?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    The infamous Joe, May 31st, 2007 @ 4:18am

    Take that, mom!

    You know, I gave a similar reason not to make my bed when I was a kid, "But, mom, it will just get unmade again tonight!"

    I agree that taking out this one guy will end up being ineffective, but that's not a good reason to stop trying to catch these douchebags.

    Though, I think we should forget about spam and worry about the freakin' zombies!!!1111 ;)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    MadJo (profile), May 31st, 2007 @ 4:27am

    Learn to read!

    It's not the fact that the guy got arrested that is ridiculous, but rather the "claim that people should see the amount of spam they receive start going down due to this arrest"

    That claim is just bogus.

    It's good that the guy got arrested (and hopefully gets sentenced (I'd be an awful jury member in this case, though the prosecutor would love me)), but it won't stop spamming in any way, nor will we see much of a decline in the amount of spam.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    James, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:14am

    So?

    Whether or not it cuts down on the spam doesn't matter, punish this loser.

    Personally, I think we should have public stonings for these biotches.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    gdwntx, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:19am

    what spam?

    I have to say I have no spam. I use GMAIL AVG and ZONE ALARM
    along with other spam blockers. I HAVE NO SPAM. Why is it others can not do the same. Every thing i us is free and works well. I still have an AOL ACCT. and even there the spam filters do the job and I just hit DELET. I must be missing somthing but I just do not get the spam others do.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:35am

    It won't really matter in the long run

    We've seen this movie before. At worst, he'll get off with
    a mere slap on the wrist, and will laugh all the way to the
    bank, having paid some minimal fine and perhaps done
    some light time. It will make absolutely no difference
    of any kind with the overall spam problem, of course,
    because he'll be back at it soon enough, and others --
    seeing how easily he got off -- will make their own efforts.

    FCC Commissioner Orson Swindle had it right: "What
    we need are a few good hangings."

    And the Feds are clueless if they're really citing "millions"
    of spams -- big-time spammers like this send at least
    that many in a single hour.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Alan, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:41am

    It won't slow down spam...

    but it feels good doesn't it?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Matt Seckora, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:43am

    spam

    Everyone seems to have great answers. I get spam because my email address is posted on the internet since I run a computer consulting company. The spam sits in a filter and I go through it. So I have no problems either. I could forward it to my gmail, yahoo, or hotmail account so it gets filtered more then it is now.

    Question for everyone that gets spam. if you run what comment Number 10 is doing lets get techdirt.com or someone to survey how much spam after a month of installing these filters and or protecting the emails get.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 31st, 2007 @ 6:44am

    Re: what spam?

    I was the same for awhile with my gmail account. I never gave out my address to anything slightly shady. Then out of nowhere, and take my word for it: it was out of nowhere. I was getting massive amounts of spam. It's simply 'cause mjoslin is a valid gmail account, hence spam will continue to be sent to it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 31st, 2007 @ 7:22am

    I'm all for the death sentence for anyone who drives slow in the fast lane, sends me spam, or gives my car door dings. Of course some people say I'm a little harsh.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Ike Love, May 31st, 2007 @ 7:42am

    Re: what spam?

    Using GMAIL AVG and ZONE ALARM is treating the symptoms of the spam disease, instead you must go after the cause of it, spammers! The guy should be publicly castrated, testicles burned, then stoned to death by a crowd of angry spam victims.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    James, May 31st, 2007 @ 8:16am

    Re: what spam?

    Fine. You get no spam, great. But you're missing the point. Being that you should not have to do these things in the first place.

    People grumble about spam but don't get fed up since its not directly costing them money. If every email you received cost you something... you'd change your tune, especially if half of them were bulls**t from a**hole hawking viagra or pr0n.

    We need to put these spamming losers under the jail.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    CHAZ, May 31st, 2007 @ 8:26am

    spam

    I have several gmail accounts and have been flowing the spam flow..some accounts after I signed in to geocaching account produced heavy spam, World Market-heavy heavy spam and others. Accounts not given out-no spam (these are accounts I just send info I want to keep on record. It also seems any overseas email contact (i'm in usa) produces more spam. Just observations.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    blocking, May 31st, 2007 @ 8:59am

    Blocking spam

    Blocking spam is not the same as not getting it.
    Go figure we got a bunch of politicians reading this stuff.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 31st, 2007 @ 9:00am

    Re: Re: what spam?

    Or setup his own email account so that for every real email he gets 10,000 spam messages are generated. I think if these spammers got a taste of their own medicine they might think twice.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Leroy, May 31st, 2007 @ 9:05am

    Solving spam

    Add this to the federal tax forms:

    Would you like $5 of this return to go to fund the international spam and internet fraud police/execution squad?

    Then we make it a crime to do business with or click on any spam.

    I think our ISP's are responsible for selling our addresses to spammers that fill our boxes. I make ones like "x5ty7$49a@netzero.com" and I still get spam, that proves that ISP provider netzero is selling my address.

    Yahoo is extremely effective at blocking spam, I see perhaps 3 in a month.

    "L"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 31st, 2007 @ 9:25am

    Spam

    I, too, have a gmail account with few spam problems (and it's even registered at geocaching.com). I had a spam problem for a while; finally traced it to an aunt who forwarded me everything that got forwarded to her. Did the "report as spam" to her. Problem solved.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    nuc'em, May 31st, 2007 @ 10:04am

    Re: move it offshore!

    Then we can invade and attack those rat bastards when we think they have weapons of mass distribution.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Gmailer, May 31st, 2007 @ 10:09am

    Still Spam

    Just because it goes to your "Spam" Filter doesn't mean that you don't get the spam. I have not gotten any spam mails in my "Inbox" however I still have 1019 spam messages in my "spam" folder. If I were using a personal server to store all of my emails in I would still be charged for the space that these emails take up, regardless of the fact that they were filtered into a folder never to be seen and deleted weekly.

    It's a typical ostrich approach to just assume that because you don't see something it isn't there.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Trouble Maker, May 31st, 2007 @ 10:34am

    two cents worth

    I have been away to long. So after a long silence I find myself responding to this.

    There are many things in this world that I find unacceptable; spamming is one of those things. There are social rules we live to attempt to live peacefully with each other is this ever shrinking world.

    I live my life by several simple rules, the first is “Each and every person has the right to do what ever they want to do as long as it does not infringe on the rights of any other person. When an act of exercising those rights leads to an action that encroaches upon someone else’s the person responsible forfeits their rights.”

    Now, these people can be gathered into large communities, separated from the general population being a strain on those willing to follow the rules.

    Or

    They can be gathered into one place and quickly and cost efficiently recycled into a product that benefits the general population in the most positive manner, like being converted into petroleum. The Soylent Green of the 21st century.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    InfDeath, May 31st, 2007 @ 10:51am

    Eye for an eye

    Ok, so this guy should be ordered to read aloud his longest spam message, he will be timed(pictures are worth one thousand words) the time it takes him to read said spam will be multiplied by the number sent, he will then have to do community service for this ammount of time to make up for wasting other people's time. He won't have to serve time but he'll have to sponge bathe senior citizens for the rest of his life.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Marble Taker, May 31st, 2007 @ 10:54am

    Spam

    Spam? what Spam? Barracuda rocks! Put that scumbag in jail where he belongs. When people start doing 15-20 years for this stuff, the problem will diminish.
    In the mean time, I'd rather have my users worry about the stuff they're NOT getting because of the Spam firewall then the 65000 spam messages coming in every month.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    The infamous Joe, May 31st, 2007 @ 11:30am

    Utopia

    Not that it isn't annoying and all, but aren't there murders and rapes and such that should be dealt with before we all get up in arms about something that, from reading comments, we don't even really get bothered with thanks to filters and such? I mean seriously.. on the grand scheme of problems with the world, spam is really really low on the list.

    I was just wondering.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Nasty Old Geezer, May 31st, 2007 @ 12:15pm

    Re: Utopia

    No way -- spam costs me time and money to protect myself, costs my employer big $ to do the same for our corporate networks. They are also guilty of screwing up the best communications tool in many years.

    Spammers burn in hell. If we can only throw them in jail, then I will take it.

    Other cops can chase the violent criminals, this is not a zero sum game.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Paul, May 31st, 2007 @ 12:24pm

    Think smarter

    We WILL see less spam if this guys arrest gets published enough.
    Will the amount of spam go down in a huge way just because he is no longer spamming? No, and that is the ONLY thing all of you are thinking about.

    If other spammers see this guy get taken down hardcore, then they might start thinking to themselves "hmm maybe now is a good time to stop before *I* get caught"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    The infamous Joe, May 31st, 2007 @ 12:45pm

    Not Harder...

    Unless I'm mistaken, spam is legal. This guy broke the rules, but taking him out doesn't mean spam goes away. So, if we arrest everyone who is breaking the law with spam, you'd *still* get spam-- which means you can write your politician of choice (hardly anyone does) or fix it on your end with a junk mail filter. Not that I am in favor of spam, but honestly, it isn't something that keeps me up at night. You might as well aim your jihad against pop-ups, which used to be a real problem until every browser under the sun integrated a pop-up blocker.

    My junk mail box hovers around 500 or so, but nothing gets through that I don't want. And that's just with gmail-- nothing else. No time and no money on my part.

    Also, Mr. Geezer, you tossed out the fun phrase "zero sum game" which I thought meant that my gains were my opponent's losses, and vice versa. I fail to see how it should apply to your topic. However, I'd like to remind you that taking one cop and making him hunt down a "Spam King" is one less cop that can be hunting down a rapist. (I'm not sure what you meant, really.)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), May 31st, 2007 @ 12:55pm

    Re: Think smarter

    If other spammers see this guy get taken down hardcore, then they might start thinking to themselves "hmm maybe now is a good time to stop before *I* get caught"

    Jeremy Jaines got sent to jail for 9 years and was fined millions... and spam continued to increase. These guys don't think they're going to get caught, and punishment isn't stopping the spammers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 31st, 2007 @ 3:33pm

    They needs to fine Pfizer for paying spammers

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    identicon
    John, Jun 1st, 2007 @ 2:35pm

    Effective punishment

    For pushiment to be an effective deterrent, it needs to be swift and certain.
    Why don't I rob a bank? Because I know I'll be caught and I know I'll go to jail?

    Why do spammers send spam? Because they know they will not be caught. And even if they are caught, what are the chances that they'll go to jail?
    Mike mentions one guy who got sent to jail for 9 years? Who else? Out of the billions and billions of spam messages that have been sent out, how many people have gone to jail?

    Now add in the fact that many spammers either operate overseas or operate a zombie network overseas. It would take a *LOT* of work to get that country's government to extradite the spammer to the US to stand trial.

    So, while it's great to hear that a spammer was arrested, I don't think arrests and jail time is an effective deterrent.

    Instead, someone (I'm not sure who) should educate people about not clicking on links in e-mails, not buying products from spammers, installing anti-spyware tools, and to start complaining to any company mentioned in spam e-mail.
    Basically, the only effective way to stop spam is to stop the income from spam. If spammers can't make any money at it, they'll stop doing it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jun 1st, 2007 @ 3:52pm

    Burn Him .........hahahahahahaha

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, Jun 2nd, 2007 @ 10:00am

    John's right (in comment #34)

    I've been fighting spam longer than almost anyone -- in fact, since before the slang term "spam" was even coined. (We called it
    "mass mail abuse" and other similar things 20 years ago.) And
    I've seen all kinds of supposed "solutions" to spam -- from
    junk like SPF ("Spam as a technical problem is solved by SPF" -- yeah,
    right) to poorly-designed spam-spewing appliances (of which Barracuda is a major offender) to idiocy like pay-per-email.

    None of these have worked, and none of them are going to work.
    They fail because none of them do what's necessary: pin
    responsibility for the spam problem on those who are responsible
    for it. By that I mean holding system and network operators
    responsible for what comes out of their networks; holding
    web hosts responsible for what they're hosting; holding registrars
    responsible for who their customers are; etc. NOBODY gets a
    pass, nobody gets to say "not my problem". Anyone providing
    any form of support to any spammer/phisher/etc. needs to
    stop, stop now, stop permanently, and ban those people for life.

    (Yes, for life. One thing we've learned is that there is no such
    thing as an ex-spammer. Not until they're dead. See "Spamford".)

    Until this happens, the spam problem will continue to get worse.

    And the only way to make this happen is to blacklist -- to
    refuse to provide services to those entities that are supporting
    spam. This makes it THEIR problem instead of OUR problem --
    it imposes economic pain (when done by a sufficient number of
    people) that appears to be the only way to direct the attention
    of those responsible to the problem.

    It's sad that this is the case. But it's been proven, over and
    over again, beyond any possible argument, that this is exactly
    how it works. So be it. We can either resign ourselves to living
    with an ever-growing spam problem, or we can have the guts
    to blacklist those responsible. Choose.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    identicon
    James, Jun 12th, 2007 @ 4:02am

    No more spam

    Two weeks ago, 100 spam emails a day. Now - ZERO. This guy must have had all the users' email addresses on my company's domain. Or are others scared? Either way, good job by the Feds.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    identicon
    JIMMIE, Jun 13th, 2007 @ 2:47pm

    Re: move it offshore!

    I DOUBT THEY DO IT IN CHINA ! IN CHINA, YOU GET EXCUTED FOR WHITE COLLAR OFFENSE, SIMPLY WRITING A FAKE CHECK ! ! FOR SPAMMING, MESSING UP CHINAS INTERNET BUSINESS, YOU WILL SURELY GET EXCUTED FOR SURE !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    identicon
    JIMMIE, Jun 13th, 2007 @ 2:54pm

    IF UR DUMB ENOUGH TO TRY, GO AHEAD, THE FEDS WANT THAT !
    THEREZ NEVER TOO MUCH FOR THE FEDS TO HANDLE, MORE MONEY FOR THE FEDS ! WOULD YOU WANT TO GO TO PRISON FOR SENDING OUT STUPID EMAILS ?ALL THOSE THAT ARE STILL SPAMMING, WILL EVETUALLY BE CAUGHT SOONER OR LATER ! YES THEY WILL BE REPLACED, REPLACED BY DUMB IDIOTS ! & THEY WILL BE CAUGHT AS WELL! WHO DOESNT KNOW UNTIL ITS TOO LATE ! I LOVE IT, AMERICA IS SUCH A AWSOME COUNTRY TO LIVE IN !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    JIMMIE, Jun 13th, 2007 @ 3:03pm

    Re: John's right (in comment #34)

    IN CHINA , YOU WILL BE EXECUTED ! SET AN EXAMPLE TO OTHERS !
    THOUSAND ARE EXECUTED EVERY YEAR, THE HIGHEST IN THE WORLD !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    identicon
    JIMMIE, Jun 13th, 2007 @ 3:12pm

    Re: So?

    SO TRUE ! YES, YES !
    FORGET STONINGS, IMMA TALKING ABOUT BRINGING BACK PUBLIC EXECUTIONZ ! MAKE THEM KNEEL, PUT ONE IN THE CHAMBER, THEN SHOOT ONE TO THE BACK OF THE HEAD ! MAKE SURE THE CAMERA IS ROLLING ! NOT IN THE US ? CHECK IT OUT IN CHINA ! YES, CHINA HAS THE HIGHEST EXECUTION IN THE WORLD !!!!!!
    DONT BELIEVE ME, LOOK FOR IT ONLINE SEE FOR URSELF !

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    identicon
    2US, Jun 19th, 2007 @ 5:27pm

    Re: Learn to read!

    "It's not the fact that the guy got arrested that is ridiculous, but rather the "claim that people should see the amount of spam they receive start going down due to this arrest"

    That claim is just bogus."

    On my account alone Spam Assissin has detected 84 messages in the last 7 days versus an aerage of more than 400 a week for the previous month.

    Have to say the claim seems less than bogus from my perspective.

    Regards
    Peter

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This