FBI Finds Convenient Scapegoat For Forgotten... >>

<< Julie Amero Sentencing Delayed Again...

Wed, Mar 28th 2007 12:42pm

FreeConference.com Sues AT&T For Blocked Phone Calls

from the need-a-resolution dept

Earlier this month, we were surprised to hear that various mobile operators were blocking phone calls to services like FreeConference.com. When you get phone service, you expect that the phone service will work to any phone number, not the ones that your phone provider decides are okay. Oddly, given the attention the story received, the FCC has remained quiet about it. Apparently, the folks at FreeConference.com got tired of sitting around and waiting and have decided to sue AT&T, asking for an injunction against the company to get it to stop blocking calls to the FreeConference.com service. It's no secret that services like FreeConference.com are costing AT&T money, mainly through ridiculous termination fees set up by regulators protecting rural telcos. However, AT&T should take that up with the regulators, rather than simply blocking access to the service. Either way, it seems likely that both the FCC and the courts will soon be deeply involved in this issue.

16 Comments | Leave a Comment

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 28th, 2007 @ 12:57pm

It's obvious how the telco's will solve the problem.

I'm sure it's only a matter of time before they amend their customer terms of service to include small print like "if any call, even a 'free' one costs us a lot of money, we will make you pay for it, after adding our own mark up."

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bill Hawkins, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 2:01pm

No problem, Bush-appointed regulators always do th
I'm fully confident this will be resolved to be benefit of the consumers, as usual.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bill Hawkins is a Moron, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 2:15pm

eom

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
at&t customer, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 2:19pm

AT&T also blocks
calls to VoIP phone numbers. I can not call anyone that uses Vonage or comcast. What's up with that?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Rick, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 3:32pm

AT&T also blocks calls to incoming Skype numbers.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 4:16pm

Bill Hawkins is
correct, since he's being sarcastic.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
happymellon, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 4:32pm

Interesting to see how this comes out
Since it was the regulators who set this up, or at least from what you mention I have no other sources to base this assumption on, it will be interesting to see how this goes. They seem to give AT&T what they want, all they have to do is stamp their collective feet a few times. So they have quite the dilemma, which makes it all the *not* surprising that they haven't brought this up.
When you pander to everyones whim, you'll find some conflict somewhere, I am really curious to see how this turns out. Hopefully everyone will get a slap on the wrist, AT&T stop blocking numbers, and rural telcos stop price gouging.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 4:39pm

Re: Interesting to see how this comes out
Hopefully everyone will get a slap on the wrist, AT&T stop blocking numbers, and rural telcos stop price gouging.
As if though AT&T doesn't price gouge.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, Mar 28th, 2007 @ 5:00pm

From the article, an AT&T spokesperson said of FreeConference: "Their legal claims are baseless and their attempt to portray their fraudulent service as “free” is a sham. There is no such thing as a free lunch, and consumers and business customers are the ones who will be left holding the bag if these types of scams are allowed to continue."

This is coming from one of those companies that advertises "free" cell phones. So, did they just call themselves scammers?

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward (profile), Mar 28th, 2007 @ 5:35pm

Those who claim that we should not have regulation guaranteeing network neutrality say that this cannot happen when companies are provided freedom from regulation so they can serve the customer. I guess the fact that this freedom has been abused to pursue underhanded business practices is a figment of my imagination.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Steve R. (profile), Mar 28th, 2007 @ 5:38pm

Those who claim that we should not have regulation guaranteeing network neutrality say that this cannot happen when companies are provided freedom from regulation so they can serve the customer. I guess the fact that this freedom has been abused to pursue underhanded business practices is a figment of my imagination.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
A. Nonny Mouse, Mar 29th, 2007 @ 9:12am

Re:
"9. by Anonymous Coward on Mar 28th, 2007 @ 5:00pm From the article, an AT&T spokesperson said of FreeConference: "Their legal claims are baseless and their attempt to portray their fraudulent service as “free” is a sham. There is no such thing as a free lunch, and consumers and business customers are the ones who will be left holding the bag if these types of scams are allowed to continue." This is coming from one of those companies that advertises "free" cell phones. So, did they just call themselves scammers?" yes

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
J. Nelson, Mar 29th, 2007 @ 10:54am

blocking Free Conference Calls
I have more than an idle curiosity about this kerfuffle. My biggest beef with Sprint and Comcast (my two providers) is that I had been calling a "Free Conference Call Service" for 4 months to participate in a high level coaching clinic that I was paying a lot of money for. They cut me off with no notice so I missed a session I had already paid $250 to participate in. So far Sprint has given me a $25 credit for causing me to miss this conference call. Their response has been pathetic from a customer service standpoint. The kid I've had email contact with is a good guy but this is probably 10 paygrades to low to be handling an irate customer like me with a legitimate beef. The thing that ticks me off the most is to do this to your customers with no notice! Unbelievably bad for cusomter relations.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Brad Templeton, Mar 29th, 2007 @ 5:26pm

No good guys here
Alas, both sides are bad guys in this fight. Both sides are players of forced pricing from monpolistic legacy regulation that shouldn't exist.

Yes, AT&T should terminate calls customers ask them to. But they should not be forced to charge the same price for all interstate long distance when people are going to hook up deliberately to rural CLECs just to exploit loopholes.

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
farqooq, Nov 27th, 2007 @ 2:17pm

phones
hello love i got a nokia 6230 it os blocked by meaning it wont let me phone eneyone it says no network coverage

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
dave, Sep 10th, 2009 @ 6:47pm

ATT call conference
Try http://www.dldirectory.com/attcallconferencedirect.htm

[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

FBI Finds Convenient Scapegoat For Forgotten... >>

<< Julie Amero Sentencing Delayed Again...

Follow Techdirt

A word from our Sponsors...

Hot Topics

New To Techdirt?

Explore some core concepts:

read all »

Techdirt Reading List

Amazon.com Widgets

Techdirt Insider Chat

silverscarcat: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/06/at-the-supreme-court-divisions-and-signs-of-trouble-to-come/276931/

Great Mizuti: clearly scc, this was the next step in the "if you've got nothing to hide...." argument. at least they're being thematically consistent, amirite? >_

silverscarcat: You know, if I was a senator, I'd tell the NSA to dump the email records of all the supporters of the NSA's programs, not only the Senators, the Reps, their families, their friends, any of their lobbyists and I would filibuster the Senate by reading off..

...The most embarrassing and damning emails that they have on live television so that the news networks (Fox, CNN, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert) could tear them apart.

Great Mizuti: I have to give credit to the Daily Show, they had segments on the NSA in every episode last week. They did not relent.

Ninja: Holy smokes it was EPIC!

100 thousand people

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/world/americas/thousands-gather-for-protests-in-brazils-largest-cities.html?ref=global-home

Leigh Beadon: @GM their segment name of "Good News! You're Not Paranoid" was especially great, i thought :)

Great Mizuti: @Leigh definitely. they did not lose their edge with the replacement host (i suppose no sign they should have, same writers probably)

silverscarcat: http://trutechnoid.com/2013/06/17/drm-is-the-future/ - If this is the future, then the future is bleak and gaming will die.

Leigh Beadon: @GM i felt like John Oliver needed a couple episodes to settle into the rhythm and now he's right on point. He's always been good though, and he's slowly bringing a bit of his own flavour to it

but yeah, the writing team is the same i'm sure, just with a different guy delivering (and possibly approving) the jokes

Mike Masnick: btw, i only just discovered last week that john oliver has a weekly podcast. which is awesome

Great Mizuti: @ssc, i could not get passed the second paragraph in that article. run-ons and fragments and grammar, oh my! this is clearly not the official spokesman for the future of the industry.

@mike, does he really?!? i did not know this. seems like something i can't live without now that i know about it.

Mike Masnick: http://thebuglepodcast.com/

silverscarcat: GM, I could barely read the article myself.

John Fenderson: Wow. I seriously think that AJ has finally suffered a complete psychotic break.

Josh in CharlotteNC: Not the first time, John. He's been overdue for awhile.

Get the Insider Chat!

A word from our Sponsors...

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Name
Email	Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
URL
Subject
Comment	this is for spambots, do not use this
Options	Save me a cookie

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Name
Email	Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
URL
Subject
Comment	this is for spambots, do not use this
Options	Save me a cookie

Tuesday
3:02pm:	Google, Without Admitting It Gets FISA Orders, Files Lawsuit To Challenge FISA Gag Orders (0)
2:29pm:	NYPD Commissioner Blasts NSA Secret Monitoring For Being Secret (4)
1:43pm:	It's Come To This: Commentators Arguing That The Press Commits A Crime In Exposing NSA Surveillance (20)
1:00pm:	US Chamber Of Commerce: Bollywood Is So Successful Without Strong Copyrights That It Will Fail Unless India Strengthens Its Copyrights (27)
11:58am:	Senator Lindsey Graham Defends NSA Surveillance By Arguing About Something Entirely Different (45)
11:15am:	NSA Claims Surveillance Programs Aided The Stopping Of 50 Attacks; Details Lacking (62)
10:31am:	The NSA's Lockbox Has No Lock (42)
9:44am:	Knowing The Government Is Spying On You Changes How You Act (41)
8:44am:	MPAA's Chris Dodd Will Be The Chair Of 'Free Speech Week' (106)
7:46am:	Steve Wozniak Speaks Out Against NSA Spying: This Is Not My America (36)

FreeConference.com Sues AT&T For Blocked Phone Calls

from the need-a-resolution dept

Reader Comments (rss)

No problem, Bush-appointed regulators always do th

AT&T also blocks

Bill Hawkins is

Interesting to see how this comes out

Re: Interesting to see how this comes out

Re:

blocking Free Conference Calls

No good guys here

phones

ATT call conference

Add Your Comment

Techdirt RSS

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

I have an idea...

I have a business...

I’m looking for research...

Hot Topics

New To Techdirt?

Tuesday

More

Company

Contact

Tools & Services

More