Copy Protection A 'Boom Business', Except When It Isn't

from the doesn't-add-up dept

A story over at InformationWeek raised our hackles a bit with the headline "Copyright Protection A Boom Business" followed by the summary saying, "Cracking down on piracy contributed to 6.6% of the U.S. gross domestic product in 2006, according to an industry lobbying group." Just sounds like more typically inflated and ridiculous claims about piracy that regularly stream out from the content industry, which then get presented to legislators as reasons why we need more laws to bolster their aging business models. Just one problem, though: the facts of the story don't support the headline at all. An industry group merely presented a report saying that "core copyright industries" -- basically content and software -- made up 6.6% of US GDP in 2006, which is a reasonable enough claim. While the group's claims don't match those of the headline, they do go off the rails in their own way. It says these industries were responsible for 13% of the country's GDP growth in 2005, and that means that they deserve more significant protection from the government in the way of stricter copyright laws and enforcement. That's a pretty pathetic admission that the only way for them to maintain their sales and growth is through increased government support and protection, instead of realizing they've got a lot more to gain if they'd quit seeing their businesses as dependent on copyright, and using it to try and manufacture scarcity.

7 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    piracy & numbers

    identicon
    franticindustries, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 3:40am

    Every time you see a number or a percentage with the word "piracy" in the same sentence, you can be completely certain that the number is either incorrect, irrelevant and a figment of some bureaucrat's imagination - or, in most cases, all three.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    But the otherside...

    identicon
    Ponder, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 5:17am

    Creating DRM is one thing, but I know for sure that as long as there is DRM then software to get round DRM will be a big market (even if its illegal)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Just the facts...

    identicon
    Vincent Clement, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 6:03am

    Durable goods accounted for 8% of US GDP. Food was good for 9.6% of US GDP. Medical sevices accounted for 12%. The category Other Services accounted for 9.7% of GDP.

    So in the scheme of things, the 'core copyright industries' are no more important than your grocery store, your hospital and bunch of miscellaneous services.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Lies, damned lies and...

    identicon
    Wizard Prang, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 6:17am

    ..what was it that Mark Twain said?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Sounds about right..

    identicon
    Bumbling old fool, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 6:57am

    It wouldnt suprise me in the least to hear that the **AA has spent 6% of the US GDP on lawyers for frivolous lawsuits.

    But just because they are wasting money does not mean they deserve more laws that will allow them to waste more money.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    |333173|3|_||3, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 3:20pm

    Actually, if there were more laws about copy protection, then they would not be wasting money, because the new laws would make sure they can get expenses fromt he people, as well as punitive dameages, so they could make a pretty big profit witout any recording at all.

    Benjamin Disraeli was the first person to come up with the three categories of falsehood. He was a Jewish politician (as in d'Israeli) who became Prime Minister of the UK

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  

    Re:

    icon
    ForgottenVoter (profile), Aug 16th, 2010 @ 11:46am

    Benjamin Disraeli was the first person to come up with the three categories of falsehood. He was a Jewish politician (as in d'Israeli) who became Prime Minister of the UK ...and what are those 3 categories of falsehood?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This