New Studies Suggest On Screen Porn And Violence Reduce Real Rape And Violence
from the more-research-needed dept
I'll be the first to say that this clearly needs to have more research done to support these findings, and there are plenty of questions raised by them, but Slate is reporting on two new bits of research that suggest that online porn reduces rape, and movie violence reduces real violence. The first study looked at the incidents of rape in areas where internet access was prevalent, and found a meaningful drop, even after controlling for "alcohol consumption, police presence, poverty and unemployment rates, population density, and so forth." The report looks at whether it might be other online content, but notes that the internet doesn't impact homicide rates in the same way. In other words, it's only rape that's decreased by internet access. The researcher also notes that it's probably not due to dating sites either, as the effect is most noticeable in those 15 to 19 years old, the least likely to use dating services. The second study finds that crime rates tend to go down following the release of violent movies. Not just following the release, but literally, during the period of night when movies are most popularly shown -- if there's a new violent movie, crime rates tend to drop. This follows throughout the night, and crime rates only pick up again the next morning. The theory here is that if violent criminals are at the theater, they're not out being violent. The reason it lasts well afterwards (the theory goes) is that the violent types are eating popcorn and drinking soda... rather than alcohol, while watching the movie. It's no secret that people have pointed out that these types of activities can often act as a "valve" to release anger, rather than bottle it up until it comes out in a more damaging way. While these two studies are hardly proof (and more research needs to back these findings up), it does suggest that perhaps there's some truth behind those claims.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
by Anonymous Coward on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:13pm
Just more proof that porn and violent media is a good thing.
Take that, Jack Thompson!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Kyros on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:16pm
This is without doubt enlightening an duseful information...oh, and first post.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
You're Kidding Me. by Jimmy C on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:20pm
Those damn europeans have had it right this whole time? What's next: catholic priests allowed to marry and suddenly we don't have any sex scandals? Crazy!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Funny by dorpus on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:25pm
I just read a report about a dad in Japan who beat the crap out of his 2 children because they erased his high scores on the gaming console. In that case, video games were a direct cause of domestic violence.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Funny by Anonymous Coward on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:33pm
That would be due to the fact that in Japan/Korea, video games are much more highly regarded one might say... And have become the lives of many people in those parts of the world. I'm not saying it doesn't happen in the Americas/Europe, but it seems to occur more often there.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Funny by AMP on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 4:35pm
1. The original post was about movies, not video games.
2. I would disagree with this entirely. I think that the direct cause of the violence was the nut job father.
3. Was the video game in question violent?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Funny by bodhiguy on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 5:06pm
Loving this one ! You mean our son who gets virtually straights A's in high school, with honors classes, and runs crosscountry half the year and track and field the other half....who also has never been in even the slighest of trouble and has a morality rating that , although in par with his friends, is off the charts...and who, don't worry lastly, has ever violent video game known to man mastered, is normal ?
Golly, maybe the answer is to take everyone of the these religious moral crusaders on a space shuttle, send them to the moon...let them battle it out in a grand war of morality...just until the winner is left standing...bring him back to earth and upon landing...SHOOT HIM IN THE FRICKIN HEAD :-)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Captain Obvious on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 5:17pm
So if we saturate the media with violence, criminals will be so busy keeping up with the latest "Psycho Dad" episodes, and overall crime rates will drop instead of just being temporarily paused?
Violent movies and games are not a valve to release pent-up anger. At best they pacify you for the same reasons that heartbeats drop when watching TV - it's passive entertainment. Of course violent people will enjoy violent movies and won't be committing crimes while watching them. Since when does this pass for scientific results? It's basic logic.
If you want to find out WHO all these people are, check crime rates during significant Nascar events or World Wrestling Federation pay-per-views (though the effect will not be as pronounced in poorer areas that can't afford $40 pay-per-view events. Use Monday Night Raw as a suitable replacement as needed.)
Select whatever type of media or events are suitable to whoever you want to study, like 50-Cent concerts, asian cinema, new World of Warcraft add-on releases, whatever. Then you can actually tell us something useful, like who's committing most of the crimes so that we can tap their phones, or better, pre-emptively arrest all of them.
If you have purchased a pay-per-view Wrestling event in the past 360 days, please report to your nearest Wellness (Detention) Center for Society Re-Education (Reprogramming).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
;-) by Nick on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 5:18pm
Uber pwnage. Take that Jack Thompson.
-Nick
Candles | Perfumes
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by qyiet on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 5:43pm
If you have purchased a pay-per-view Wrestling event in the past 360 days, please report to your nearest Wellness (Detention) Center for Society Re-Education (Reprogramming).
Actually.. that idea has some merit
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Funny by Eric on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:08pm
The analogous example to western culture would probably be to fanaticism over football or baseball.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by 20 $ cookie on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:16pm
Ok.. really lets think about these facts though,
Where there is internet acess, we are talking about middle class to upper class citizens. That doesnt mean the % of rape or volence is any lower in reality. It just shows that with money and education, there is less violence and rape. If the areas were just educated, rather than looking at porn and playing violent video games, im sure things would be diffrent. Because lets face it, everyone has played a violent video game, and more than half of teen boys have seen pornography, probably more than that.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Funny by Zarquon on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:20pm
don't blame games, blame stupid/crazy people.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Frank on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:22pm
Why is it so many researchers can't understand the elementary difference between association and causation?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Demographic studies are useless by Halb on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:30pm
This seems to be the classic demographic study, which means the "facts" derived are basically useless.
For example, just because Internet access is available in an area does not mean people are using the Internet to view pornography.
To establish a cause and effect relationship, you must not just note coincident timing. If you tested a group of known rapists and/or criminals and see if their criminal habits changed when exposed to violent movies or pornography, then perhaps there would be matter to discuss.
Most people who make factual assessments from pseudo-science studies like this are just looking for excuses to support their preconceived notions.
Secondly, ethical journalism always provides the source of survey results. Slate, I presume, merely republished these results. Who was the researcher and the financial sponsor of the research?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by ok on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:36pm
So any study shows something causes problems you make fun of, but the ones that show they don't get good reviews?
Yeah, thats unbiased.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Ture by u no on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 6:45pm
as a teenaged boy living in a male dorm room, I would think closer to 95% of teen boys have seen porn. Also, studies like these can be twisted to say whatever it is the ones conducting the study want them to say. Just like the post above me said.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Mike on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 7:26pm
Where there is internet acess, we are talking about middle class to upper class citizens. That doesnt mean the % of rape or volence is any lower in reality. It just shows that with money and education, there is less violence and rape
Except that the study controlled for all of those things... So your point doesn't hold. It found that even when you controlled for those things, the number of rapes went down.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Demographic studies are useless by Mike on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 7:28pm
This seems to be the classic demographic study, which means the "facts" derived are basically useless.
Perhaps.
For example, just because Internet access is available in an area does not mean people are using the Internet to view pornography.
Absolutely true, though the report does try to explain how it came to its conclusion.
To establish a cause and effect relationship, you must not just note coincident timing. If you tested a group of known rapists and/or criminals and see if their criminal habits changed when exposed to violent movies or pornography, then perhaps there would be matter to discuss.
Indeed, which is why more research is needed.
Most people who make factual assessments from pseudo-science studies like this are just looking for excuses to support their preconceived notions.
See comment above.
Secondly, ethical journalism always provides the source of survey results. Slate, I presume, merely republished these results. Who was the researcher and the financial sponsor of the research?
You can find the links in the Slate article.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Mike on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 7:30pm
So any study shows something causes problems you make fun of, but the ones that show they don't get good reviews?
This is a good review? I say repeatedly that more research needs to be done and that there are questions raised by them.
However, the reasoning makes sense. The reasoning in the other studies didn't make sense. Is it because of bias? Perhaps. But no one seems to be coming up with a convincing explanation for these results otherwise.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Jason on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 7:47pm
It's true. When I get homicidal, I just go fuck shit up on a video game, killing every living organism the game designers put in for me. It is quite relaxing. I derive psychotic pleasure from doing it. Same goes for the porn. When I'm in the mood, satisfaction is a mere mouse click away....with none of the BS that goes along with a real woman. Thank God for technology.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Oh Good by |333173|3|_||3 on Oct 30th, 2006 @ 9:33pm
If I weren't about to finish school anyway (in Oz), it might be worth sending my admin a link to this page. still, I'd probalby just get banned for spaming him. :D
Interesting survey, but I think more research is needed.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by MadJo on Oct 31st, 2006 @ 2:13am
I disagree that video games can be considered passive entertainment. It is very active. With TV and movies indeed all you do is watch, but with video games it's YOU how controls the character. So you can't possibly call it passive entertainment.
BTW, I love the Die Hard movies (just to take an example), but I can not be considered a violent man, not by a long shot.
I also like to play first person shooters as a valve to shoot away any frustrations I might get at work. But I've yet to fire a real gun, and I don't intend to change that any time soon.
Which is safer? Acting out frustrations on a bunch of pixels or on a live person?
You can't tell me, that I'm alone in this!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Are criteria is so low... by halb on Oct 31st, 2006 @ 4:21am
This discussion is about whether a frustrated person is doing better by spending time masterbating or fantasizing about killing those he hates, or by actually acting out his passions.
I would rather have responsible members of society who spend their time investing in greater causes (fighting poverty, caring for their children, curing diseases, caring for elderly neighbors, wisely governing, etc.). That too would reduce rape and violent crime.
Sitting in a room privately satisfying your animal passions does nothing positive for our society. In fact, we seem to be losing a generation of young people to the lure of this nonsense.
Give me a civil society where young men and women have loftier goals and want more from their lives. Violent movies and pornography are certainly not the way to obtain that.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Violence in Japan by Been There on Oct 31st, 2006 @ 12:30pm
Japan has some of the most violent animation on TV and in their magazines. As I recall, there is even a comic character called "Rape Man" who is the hero. You can imagine what he does.
And yet, in Japan, violence is much much lower than here in the States.
No surprises, when you supress things, people act out.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by AAM on Nov 15th, 2006 @ 7:50pm
This article intrests me. I am a strong supporter of free speech, and it is good to finally see some people conducting studies that show violence and inapropriate material in the media leads to a decrease in violence and such behavior in the actual world.
All I hear are agruments on how things like violent video games and movies corrupt our youth, and I'm tired of it. If enough people see statistics like these, we can sleep soundly at night knowing our rights are protected and our streets are safer.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by AAM on Nov 15th, 2006 @ 8:06pm
Psyche! I don't believe these statistics at all, well, maybe a little, but not as I said before.
Heres the deal. DON'T RELY ON ANY STUDY LIKE THIS. And I mean this for both sides of the argument. People spend way too much time trying to relate morals to media. They are two tottally separate things, and we don't know how the human minds works completley to make such strong assumptions and corellations.
I am prefectly okay with saying this argument is probably as biased as the arguments against violent media. But whatever the statistics say, people are different.
There are many posts above where people admit to using these things as a "valve" for stress. Others say that doing things like these are not productive and don't help you in the long run. Either way it doesen't matter. It a question of personal freedom.
I play plenty of violent videogames, but not becuase I need to vent stress or am angry at the world. If I was, I still probably woulden't use violent media as an outlet for my rage. I play games and watch movies purley for entertainemnt. Regardless of how much fun I have blasting heads in video games, watching geysers of blood spew in Kill Bill, and whacking it looking at dirty pictures on the internet, I still am the same person before and after, and my world view does not change. The only reason I may feel relieved of stress is purley becuase it is a relaxing activity I enjoy doing, not unlike reading a book or doing tai chi or something.
As stated before, people react to and "use" different forms of media in different ways. Artcicles packed with statistics and massive studies don't have as much merit and signifcance as they are said to by liberals and evenagelical christians alike.
Besides, most of the problem is just the huge generation gap combined with the ever increasing rate at which technology is falling into the hands of "impressionable" youngsters.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
art&crafts by johnrichard on Feb 6th, 2007 @ 2:50am
Manufacturer of Wooden Handicrafts,Indian Handicrafts,
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Two Way Radio Battery by Jim Goodman on Feb 19th, 2007 @ 5:33am
TwoWayBattery.com is your source for high quality two way radio replacement batteries, chargers, eliminators and accessories. Enjoy our 30-day money back guarantee and same-day free shipping on all orders over $149.00.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Alinco Radio Batteries by Jim Goodman on Mar 13th, 2007 @ 4:27am
TwoWayBattery.com presents a convenient way to purchase high quality Alinco two way radio batteries for a complete range of Alinco two way radio models at incredible factory direct prices. Our store offers an exhaustive list of Alinco replacement batteries and accessory options that support radios manufactured by OEM's such as Alinco.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I have an opinion or is it fact from an expert by Alan on Apr 17th, 2007 @ 7:44pm
Lt. Col. Dave Grossman (retired) is an expert on the psychology of killing. He now teaches psychology at Arkansas State University, directs the Killology Research Group in Jonesboro, Arkansas, and has written On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society (Little, Brown and Co., 1996). http://www.killology.com/bio.htm
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Porn reduces rape fallacy by Alia on Oct 23rd, 2007 @ 6:20am
The problem with the notion that porn reduces rape or violence against women is that most pornography is rape or violence against women. They are not mere images pulled out of thin air. Someone had to perform the acts for you to watch, and unfortunately according to almost all of the research on pornography, the (mostly) women and children in it are not there because they really want to be. Concepts of choice and consent are very ambiguous when there is addiction, poverty, coercion, child abuse etc. One example is Linda Lovelace, who appeared in a movie that is considered a porn 'classic', but which is in fact a filmed record of her sexual assault.
Another problem with the idea that porn reduces rape is that it completely misunderstands what rape actually is. Rape has nothing to do with sex or sexual release. It is the violent, brutal exercise of power of one human being over another. Free speech has never been entirely protected. Your right to free speech and expression ends where it violates the rights of another human being, particularly the right to be free from violence and worse.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
request more info by justin gooding on May 1st, 2008 @ 8:24am
your absolutaly right about violent media decreasing arrest rates. I'm doing research on this topik and i would like any info you can give me.
Thankyou ^^
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by kolli on Jun 15th, 2008 @ 8:24am
гостевая книга
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment