RSS
Supreme Court To Consider Bad Patents Again
from the hopefully... dept
We've been discussing many of the reasons why the patent system is broken for quite some time -- and while a few people who benefit from the system always show up to defend it (usually with tautological arguments that amount to "the system works, because it's the system we have"), it appears that more and more people are recognizing that the system is fundamentally broken. The latest is author Michael Crichton who discusses how the patent system has expanded far too broadly to protect things that should never be protected -- and how it's harming innovation in many ways by making it prohibitively expensive. The focus of his article is on a specific case that is going to the Supreme Court this week, where a company was able to get the patent on the correlation between a certain amino acid and a certain vitamin. They now consider even publishing the details to be a violation of their patent -- even if it's simply factual information. Over the past few decades, patent lawyers have pushed for expansions in what patents can cover, well beyond what the system was ever intended to do. Granting a patent is giving someone a monopoly -- and that should only be done in the rarest of cases where the market has been shown to be insufficient in rewarding innovation. From the earliest days of the patent system, Thomas Jefferson made it clear that there was an inherent downside to patents, and they should only be granted under special circumstances. Why that should include things like correlations or business models (or software) has never been adequately explained.
I have an idea...
Securing Venture Capital for that Next App Development
App Developer Conversations: Successful Fundraising Techniques
I’m looking for policy...
Developers On Patents: Five Employees, Six Lawyers
Jon Potter: Software Patent Trolls Can Be Stopped By U.S. Patent Office And Congress
I have an app...
How My First Game Made $28,623
Marketing And Monetization Strategies For Free Apps
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
>_>
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's obvious - lawers make more money that way.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Uh...
This country is seriously in the toilet....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Uh...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Uh...
*pssst!* It's Thousand Island Dressing, pass it on!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Is Michael Serious?
Oops. :-P
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
You mean the Mystery Sause? Its "Thousand Islands" Salad Dressing. Not that mysterious.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I must have missed that comment.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
How about a link
This is one area where TechDirt really fails as a website - if you are against patents, fine, but how about doing real research instead of parroting those who agree with you. Just because Chriton says "it's the correlation" doesn't mean that's what the case is really about.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Let me define evil: Any action that actively or potentially hurts the survival or evolution of one's own species.
This is the deepest evil there is. Genocide is along the same lines, although obviously much more severe.
Patents restrict our ability to apply technology to good use. What would have happened if someone patented oxygen masks? fire hydrants? anything that humanity might depend on in any way?
Patents are evil, no matter how small the impact, if even because they are born of greed. You patent because you want credit for having made it or so that only you can profit from the sale of it. Thats greed, even if it's good business practice.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
greed is good !
Greed is right.
Greed works.
Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit.
Greed, in all of its forms -- greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge -- has marked the upward surge of mankind."
Gordon Gekko
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: greed is good !
Drug companies patent drugs that save lives so that no generics can be made, then hide the results behind trade secrets and release the good reviews.
Greed for money has allowed bad products to continue to be marketed hidden behind trade secrets and caused many deaths. It has allowed "independent" groups to ignore fundamental flaws, and politicians to refuse to help in such situations.
Greed, just as anything else needs to be tempered and controlled to be of value, todays rampant more money at any cost society can not sustain itself.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
In essence the root of all actions are greed (i.e., I want the world to be a better place), but that is no justification. The fact remains that the greedy are just plain narcisistic and that doesn't help anyone but themselves.
"Yes, you are absolutely right, companies hiding behind trade secrets and patents have always helped mankind."
"Drug companies patent drugs that save lives so that no generics can be made, then hide the results behind trade secrets and release the good reviews."
I'm going to try very hard not to insult you.
Generics? What the hell are you talkign about? Who has the right to determine what is "official"? The only thing patents do are create monopolies. If no "Generics" can be made, as you call them, these ill individuals have to pay top-dollar just to get treatments. "Generics", as you call them, are what make Free Market so great. You can get get your drugs from Company A, or if yo ucant afford them, you can go get them from Company B, C, or D.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
no patents = no new medicine
This is rather sad but 100% correct fact.
Yes, this is about greed.
And I would rather pay monopoly prices but have access to all new medicines out there.
You never know what you might need as you grow older ,
e.g. Viagra, Levitra etc. etc.
Or you might get AIDS or cancer one day, and without patents nobody will do anything to develop new drugs to treat those.
Greed runs the world ! Not altruism.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
That is completely illogical.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How about a link
2 seconds on Google, and I found http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/2005/10/labcorp_v_metab_1.html
which directly quotes the disputed part of the patent. I also found many other documents about this specific case. While a link in the article would be convenient, this isn't kindergarten, and you can do research on your own. But, I hope this helps you out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
happy happy joy joy
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: IT IS THE BIG MAC SAUSE U RETARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
patent
www.BettorsChat.com
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment