Wow. Minnesota really doesn't seem to get the message. They've been told to leave VoIP alone a year ago. Then, the FCC confirmed that they should leave VoIP alone. Yet, they still went forward trying to tax VoIP and were told again that they could not. Apparently, they don't want to take no for an answer, and want to make VoIP extra expensive for no real reason other than that they have to tax something. Broadband Reports notes that Minnesota has appealed the issue again. This time, they're really trying to play up the angle that they need to regulate (read: tax) VoIP to ensure that 911 service works and that rural areas get covered. Of course, 911 issues are being worked out, and the question about rural coverage is one for broadband companies, not VoIP providers.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Ex-FBI Agent, Trauma Surgeon Testify That Kelly Thomas' Death Was A Result Of Officers' Excessive Force
- Scumbag Revenge Porn Site Operator Arrested... But Many Of The Charges Are Very Problematic
- Legal Challenges To Spying Mount In UK
- Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood Thinks Google Is To Blame For Infringement On The Web
- Feds To FISC: Of Course We Don't Have To Share Our Full Legal Filings With Companies Suing Us Over NSA Transparency