Press Release, Spam, What's The Difference?

from the it-seems-to-be-clearly-spam dept

It's amazing the level of stupidity to which PR people will sink. Just two weeks after we wrote about idiotic PR people submitting press releases to us when we clearly ask them not to, one company has sunk to a new low -- and it's making me wonder if PR pitches are officially spam under the law. First, instead of using the submission function, this PR spammer tracked down my email address. Not hard to do, but if you want anyone here to write about something, it makes our life much better to use the submission page. That's why we have it. If you're going to make our lives more difficult, why would we ever bother to make yours better by giving you free publicity? If you can't take the time to actually read the site and understand the process, why should we take the time to hype up your fake news? However, instead of just sending the usual note that PR people tend to do, this individual sent us FOUR press releases in a row, all using CAPITAL LETTERS and all marked URGENT. I honestly thought it was traditional spam at first, as I would any time I received four emails in a row written in capital letters from someone I didn't know. However, it's clearly been sent to us for posting purposes. The company in question (who I won't bother to name) has been mocked on certain other sites for its ability to take whitebox laptops, mark up the price to ridiculous levels, and then promote it as their own (you figure it out). None of the announcements are even remotely interesting to our audience, and anyone who had read Techdirt for more than a day would know not to bother submitting them. It's no surprise, of course, that this guy clearly does not read the site. However, when I looked closer at the emails in question, I think I could make a very convincing case that they are, indeed, spam as defined by the law. First, the message does not include, as required, the address of the company sending the PR spam. Second, the "from" line includes a name, but no email address. The guy didn't spoof a different email address, but somehow fudged the headers so that there's no email address in the from or reply-to fields. There is no option to opt-out. In fact, it's not easy to email them back to ask to opt-out because there's no reply-to email address. So, beyond just being entirely moronic, is this company guilty of spamming? Update: It gets worse. I just went through my spam filter, and it caught seven more spam/press releases from this guy. He spammed me with 11 press releases, all urgent, all in capital letters, no reply-to address and no return address.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    drteknikal (profile), Jul 29th, 2004 @ 1:10pm

    put them on notice

    You should put them on notice that in the future such submissions will result in public humiliation of the company and their PR agency BY NAME.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Ben, Jul 29th, 2004 @ 1:29pm

    Press Release, Spam, What's The Difference?

    FWIW, I've long used an e-mail filter that trashes any message where the subject is in all caps. I originally did this to ignore mainframe types, but it continues to be at least slightly useful for Spam.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    thecaptain, Jul 29th, 2004 @ 6:26pm

    No Subject Given

    I say you SHOULD name them, as negatively as possible.

    I for one am unlikely to be doing business with such a company, but I would take GREAT joy in recommending others who WOULD to stay away...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    dorpus, Jul 29th, 2004 @ 8:02pm

    What about the sponsored link?

    I just installed Firefox/Adblock, and I enjoyed blowing away the sponsored link that shows up on the bottom of techdirt pages.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    dorpus, Jul 29th, 2004 @ 8:09pm

    Re: What about the sponsored link?

    Oh, and I blew away your ugly logo too, Mike. :-) Have you considered getting a cooler logo or something?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    known, Jul 29th, 2004 @ 8:28pm

    Re: What about the sponsored link?

    Now if there were only a "dork filter" for removing idiotic comments from blogs -- like for firefox boy above

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Michael Randall, Jul 30th, 2004 @ 3:17am

    I think I got them too

    Can't remember the name they came from now, and I deleted them as spam - if they're the same ones, they're definitely spam, not PR. From some guy's full name, in all caps, all about those overhyped flaptops that have just released a new family that apparantly enjoys a threesome? Gold, silver, Hollywood, sort of things?

    I do have a little blog, but I'm in no way part of a news site, and don't solicity press releases in any form, so it's definitely spam. I'd say go for it and name/shame them.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Good Flack, Jul 30th, 2004 @ 7:35am

    No Subject Given

    Spam no, annoying yes. Just ingnore the email. If someone can't spend a few minutes to learn more about the "media" he or she is attempting to pitch, not worth replying to. Enough of the general, sweeping characterizations of ALL PR people. There are some out there who know how to play the game. As a former journalist and current media relations person, I for one can say that we are not all 20-somethings named Jennifer or Curt shooting out 600 unsolicited pitches to media. Don't get me started on my generalizations of all those in the media, or those techno "experts", or bloggers thinking they are journalists because they now have a piece of paper on which to print.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    goldleaf, Apr 8th, 2010 @ 12:14pm

    They can use and abuse their power and influence all the want. Until it becomes easier for me to buy and use stuff how I choose, I’ll keep pirating it! Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting Promotional Chocolates different results! Attempt to strong-arm me into doing it your way, and I’ll keep doing it my way just because you’re trying to force me to do it your way. Let me have the freedom to make a choice, and ill support you and your product!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    newest jordan shoes, Nov 8th, 2010 @ 11:38pm

    newest jordan shoes

    I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This