While not specifically dealing with technology, here's a case that shows some of the complexities of our current intellectual property system. A famous yoga instructor apparently "copyrighted, trademarked and franchised his poses, breathing techniques and dialogue." Now, he's going around suing those yoga teachers who are infringing on that intellectual property. The sued yogis point out that yoga is a 5,000 year old tradition, and find it hard to understand how you can copyright a "pose". The response, of course, is that it's not the poses, but the combination of the poses that creates the overall program. So, then, the question becomes what is "fair use" for these programs? What if you do a few of the poses and mix it in with others? The article doesn't go into all the details, but it sounds like they're focusing on the copyright issue, which seems like a more difficult case. If other yoga instructors claim they're teaching Bikram yoga, then the guy has a trademark claim - but otherwise it seems like a tough sell to say you can own the intellectual property on a series of poses. In the meantime, I'm betting that this case has increased the stress levels of those being sued - which seems fairly un-yoga-like.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Feds Insist It Must Be Kept Secret Whether Or Not Plaintiff In No Fly List Trial Is Actually On The No Fly List
- Documents Show LA Sheriff's Department Hired Thieves, Statutory Rapists And Bad Cops
- Unarmed Man Charged With Assault Because NYC Police Shot At Him And Hit Random Pedestrians
- Judge In No Fly Case Explains To DOJ That It Can't Claim Publicly Released Info Is Secret
- German Court Says CEO Of Open Source Company Liable For 'Illegal' Functions Submitted By Community