The debate on the possibilities of cold fusion has gone on for years, and many physicists see cold fusion as the wacko theory of physics. So, you might be able to imagine just a little bit of the politics that went into getting Science magazine to publish researchers who say they've done cold fusion. It seems that everyone tried to stop the publication, insisting that it couldn't possibly be true - despite Science's review of the research (and apparently, they're fairly thorough). It seems a bit odd to me that people would be so against the publication. If it really is bogus (as the famous Pons/Fleischmann cold fusion deal was years ago) then that will be proven, and this new study will also be discredited. However, if someone really has done cold fusion then it would be quite revolutionary. While I tend to agree with the skeptics as to whether or not this is legit (at least until a lot more research is done), I don't see anything wrong with publishing the findings to let others dig into them.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DailyDirt: Safe Until Proven Harmful
- Former NSA Officer: Wikileaks Is A Front For Russian Intelligence And Snowden's (Probably) A Spy
- Did Ed Snowden Actually Write His Latest 'Statement'?
- Lawyer Suggests That Prenda Law May Have Only 'Released' Movies It Sued Over As A Honeypot For Lawsuits
- DailyDirt: Lobsters -- Sea Food Different