Little did EA know that the biggest "social component" of their always-online game would be everybody bitching about how badly they fucked up and crippled this new SimCity game.
[i]Facebook made its case publicly, agreeing that there were some privacy and civil liberties concerns with the bill, but that on the whole the bill was good.[/i]
I feel a strong irony of the fact that facebook agrees there are "privacy concerns" but agrees with the bill anyway, because that's pretty much the way they feel about user privacy isn't it?
Not quite as ironic as how EA used the trumped up 'social aspect' of the new SimCity as a way to pretend that always-on DRM and no single player was legitimate. Little did they know that the ultimate social aspect of their game would be all the gamers, message boards, news articles and blogs that were bitching about how much EA (and Maxis) royally frakked up a loved franchise.
But EA has been digging this hole for years, so I don't see them doing an about face anytime soon -- whereas Facebook apparently thinks it still needs to save some face.
What they really should have said was:
'We think we do a great job handling software and smartphone patents, in spite of knowing nothing about either of them!'
Leaders change but the oppression remains the same.
I honestly could see the Shadowrun style corporate ruled world emerge in the next... 50 years or so.
Their concern is that the American public still has a right to privacy protections -- and they're mostly concerned that they can't figure out an easy way to circumvent that.
I don't feel so bad for not carrying my cell phone on me all day after reading this, though. I usually put it on the table or leave it in the car.
BSG: Blood and Chrome was released onto youtube a week at a time. I thought that was pretty good. I feel like getting all 13 episodes in one shot is sort of like Caprica did at the end, just to burn off the episodes. You need some sort of time delay, I think, just to make people want it. A handful of people want to consume the series when it is all out all at once at the end. However, plenty of others enjoy just having a couple of shows to watch a week. But, it should be neat to see it play out.
The comment about cracking safes is golden. Our country has a really big problem with this train of thought in general -- they attempt to fix the symptoms of problems, not the cause (ie. it's not bad security practices to do this -- just avoid this one guy who who know may be able to crack your safes!).
Politicians are especially bad at this, because usually causes are much more complex than the symptoms they manifest as. So it looks like they're "doing something" and getting that re-electability cred they so desire.
Whether some law abiding citizen chooses to own a gun or not is *THEIR* business. Putting their name and address out there for the whole world to see, as happened in NY, seems to actually run counter to the whole public safety ideal, doesn't it?
I pretty much agree with how Jon B. put it. I don't see any "hypocrisy" here. Seems like pretty much a non-story to me.
So... I take it that everybody seems to think that Google just prints money, and they want in.
I mean, damn it, they're established middlemen and gatekeepers of the industry. They're just too big to fail!
Yep, just came in to post this. Several Star Wars documentary features point this out pretty blatantly.
http://youtu.be/VGbSOEWRgu0?t=1m30s
Tim's point still stands, though.
As usual, the word "conversation" really means "a one sided lecture".
See, if we don't talk about wars, they're not really happening! Apple is just doing their part to help us Americans maintain our oblivious status quo.
"I reject your reality, and substitute my own."
There were a lot of fantastic funny/insightful posts on that Sony story. Glad to know I'm in good company of people who are so offended by their track record (new DRM scheme, the old rootkits scandal, failure to give a shit about customer's information ala PSN hacking) who refuse to buy or use another Sony product.
Go ahead and do it Sony, and I'll never buy/play another one of your products again.
Oh wait, I already don't, thanks to other various stupid crap from the past (rootkit scandal, anyone?).
Perhaps you remember when the Associated Press attempted to get this information on Illinois FOID card owners? Well, the state AG said they had to be turned over, and the ISP said "no", and they passed a law that kept this information private (law enforcement and such agencies only).
In my personal view, Illinois actually got that one right -- it's information that does not need to be public.
To quote Battlestar Galactica...
This has happened before...
and it will happen again...
and again...
and again...