There are no lawyers, it's a "pro-se" plaintiff. That being said, I'd think you'd need more than just a name to file a lawsuit. Address? Id? IANAL so not sure, but it seems there's a hole in the system if this goes through.
While I'd love it if this happens, it's a tough sell.
The whole "they broke into my house" real world pseudo-analogy muddies the waters for jurors, and most people prosecuted under this CFAA bullshit are unsympathetic to a public primed on irrational (and in some cases overtly anti-rational) fear.
You and I might support Aaron Swartz (RIP) and Edward Snowden (at least I do), but I doubt we're in the majority.
If you look at the end of the complaint, the signature is just "BS".
the product of panicked early-80s legislating in response to underdeveloped hacker fears
He just compared himself to ISIS:
it is the psychology because so many people think [ISIS are] winning. [...] Trump is winning. It's good psychology, you know. It's good psychology.Good lord.
Imagine if it comes back as more. That would be glorious.
The Chinese Wall is already the only(?) human-built structure discernible with the naked eye from orbit.
Die, evil trope! Die! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Wall_of_China#Visibility_from_space
When Larpenter was asked whether there is a conflict in him investigating an alleged crime involving himself, he replied, "If you're gonna lie about me and make it under a fictitious name, I'm gonna come after you."
Dubious? More like squamous and rugose...
If you have a beef with the Militia or Government then you have a beef with America itself for both are part of America's heritage!
This isn't even science. Software automates application of theories.
For example, ballistics software takes theories of ballistic trajectories and wind resistance, factors in information like projectile details and wind velocity, and predicts a landing spot.
You could achieve the same thing on paper, but it's less reliable over time and much slower. That being said, it's reproducible.
This software automates what science, exactly? Computers can only do what we can tell them to do (Skynet notwithstanding) so what amazing algorithmics did some podunk company from nowhere come up with to solve problems that have stymied some of the best funded organizations on the planet? (e.g US defense dept)
How about:
#ClapYourHandsToSaveTinkerbell
#WeAssumeYouAreAPedo
#IdentityTheftOnlyHappensToBadPeople
#LetMeInYourBackdoor
Open source the software.
Some nerd can update the app to let people choose a central node address, and allow people to run their own servers.
Doing that would qualify as not being evil.
Someone proved you couldn't do it.
They start out big and blustering but quickly become limp and fail to perform.
Indeed. One would even say that taking the comment to mean they would actually use random numbers is skirting the actual issues the comment discusses, almost as if "Whatever" were being a dickhead to obscure the weakness of his point... hmmm.....
The phone will still be secure with those patches applied
We don't want to break anyone's encryption or set a master key loose on the land. I hope thoughtful people will take the time to understand that, despite the fact that what we are asking for will set loose a master key upon the land. It's like they say, it's the thought that counts.
Unlikely. FM probably realised they had a slam dunk as it plays on the prejudice of "sneaky chinese bastards who don't respect IP."
"Chinese knock offs" are a common theme in a lot of media. I'd speculate they just banked on the judge having typical western bias to Chinese products.
Also missing
Kodi, Showbox, TPB (if it's still alive), Popcorn time (various forks, if still alive), etc...
Paying is de facto optional, and hidden fees and other anti-consumer actions make the option even less attractive.
"Head in sand" is not a business model, all attempts by incumbents to the contrary notwithstanding.