Then such a law needs to be challenged as unconstitutional, citing the Massachusetts ruling re: 1st and 4th amendment issues.
And I agree that this is getting absolutely ridiculous. WTF is going on up there in IL?
...a pretty bad decision.
Now there's an understatement. It goes well beyond just being a bad decision.
Probably just a cash-strapped PD seizing an opportunity to cite someone for something they might call Unauthorized Directing of Traffic. Or some other bullshit name. Just so they could cash in. Or something.
When someone doesn't really have a fact-based argument, two things tend to happen:
1. The accusation of FUD by whoever they disagree with.
2. The overcapitalization of WORDS throughout the POST in order to try and EMPHASIZE their point so that the reader won't have to THINK too much to UNDERSTAND what they are TRYING to say.
Rapier-sharp compared to yours.
Your dittohead comment shows where your point of view is coming from. And your talking points are fed to you by the likes of MSNBC, the NY Times, et al....
Looks like you're not so unique, yourself.
that can't keep the story straight:
MC: So you are a robot.
FC: No, my name is Cleverbot.
MC: Yes, you are a robot and your name is Cleverbot.
FC: I am a robot.
Answers no to "are you a robot" then the very next phrase uttered by the bot is "I am a robot."
Friggin' women....
I live in Texas. In New Braunfels (near San Antonio.) I can attest that TxDOT is full of idiots.
All you have to do is drive on the roads here and you wonder who the hell designed this crap.
Seems like their lawyers are equally stupid.
because so many of you kids PLAY GAMES.
Yep. I'm a 44 yr old kid. And I still play games.
OOB, you still don't get it. I doubt you ever will.
Most of us are willing to pay for the games we want to play, but when companies like EA, Ubisoft, et al., come along and put these kinds of demands on their potential customers, the word "potential" is changed to "lost."
And since the cracked copy will not have those restrictions on it, a lot of those lost customers will download the game.
These companies will never learn that copy protection/DRM will not stop piracy. And as they get more restrictive, or want to collect more data from your PC, the more potential customers they are going turn into lost customers.
All the DRM says to me is "Mr. Consumer, we at [Big Software Company] just don't trust you. You have to let us snoop around on your computer and collect all sorts of information on you in order to use our software. And if you do that, we also own your computer since our software is now installed on it. And by the way, you don't own this software, you are only licensing it, and we can shut down our DRM servers without notice, at which time the software will automatically be uninstalled from your computer, and you must return the physical copy of the DVD with all documentation it the original packaging... at your expense.
And cookies. Make sure you send cookies."
Manager to employee relationships is juuuuust a bit different than that of teacher to student, donchathink?
Just because it has the potential to become inappropriate, doesn't mean a teacher shouldn't "friend" a student, especially if that student needs extra help in the subject being taught by said teacher. If the really shy kid that won't speak up and ask a question in the classroom can do so via facebook, then why shouldn't the teacher be able to communicate with the student via that platform?
And to include former students? That's really where it goes too far. I'm no longer a student, why can't there be such a thing as an actual friendship with a teacher? You can't tell me that I'm just supposed to forget about, and never speak to, a teacher that may have had great influence on me during my time in his/her class.
You, sir, and politicians anywhere, cannot, and will not, tell me who I can and can't be friends with.
Maybe he should get with Charlie Sheen...
OOB, you seem to think that if protections (read DRM) are stripped out, the company CANNOT profit from it.
That statement, sir, is at variance with the truth.
Companies can and do profit from products with no DRM, especially from me, as I refuse to purchase anything that even has DRM. I probably have some games that do have DRM but that was before I knew better.
Copy protection for software has been around for decades, and it still hasn't stopped piracy. It never will.
When you buy a game that requires your internet connection to always be on, or on every time you launch the game, or that you can only install ONE time (if you want to install it on that nice new PC you bought 4 months after buying the game, you have to purchase another license!), then all you do is piss off your customers that bought the software. I guarantee that next time you want a game from that company, you'll think twice about it due to the previous experience with all the restrictions that DRM imposes on you.
This so reminds me of Monty Python...
And Mr. Neal Gabler-Mollusc can be said to be this years outstanding twit.
Political activist.. Massachusettes.. need we say more?
A police officer filed... He IS part of the police force, therefore he is the police, and therefore "The Police" did, indeed, file.
How hard was that to work out?
I completely agree. This went way beyond Police Brutality, into the realm of Assault and Battery, and not just a misdemeanor.
I think this guy should go Mr. Melvin should go by the old addage: An eye for an eye........
Stewie saying Hwil Hweaton anytime I see Will's name anywhere.
Cracker? Now that you've gone down the path of racial ephithet's, can we really take you seriously?
By all standards, perhaps it's time to fix your attitude, too.
You join the long list of AC's in the "inability to follow civil discussion" group.
Re: Re:
What was the definition of an asshat?
Calling someone stupid that uses a 'factoid' once, claiming that said person posts it "over and over again."