Silverscarcat's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the stay-frosty dept
Hey, Techdirt readers. What's up? Yeah, looks like it's my turn to pick my favorite posts of the week. Lots of stuff was covered this week, so how about we get into it?
I've always been interested in various copyright laws, since I, like many fans, tend to use the "gray" area of copyright known as fanfiction and fanart. Really, it's just a good story or good artwork that can get me interested in a show easier than anything else.
And it's because of that that when I see stuff like SOPA, PIPA, ACTA and TPP that I get worried. Stuff that I and many others enjoy would suddenly no longer be protected by safe harbors that's afforded by the DMCA.
Which is why when I see the weak response that the White House puts out about their stance about ACTA, it's both worrying and angering. After all, the internet should be free and not limited because businesses can't innovate.
Speaking of things that can't innovate, the RIAA seems to think that making new laws will stop piracy. I think we need to get the RIAA and MPAA execs in a room and give them a full history of Prohibition and the results of that. Or maybe the war on drugs, which has done nothing to stop people from getting the drugs and instead just increased the prison populations.
Of course, when they realize that stakeholders are no longer able to fit in one room, maybe then they'll start to understand the internet a little more. This is the internet and information age, we're connected all over the world and people force businesses to increase their customer service or lose business.
Speaking of the internet, it's pretty sad that there's all these data caps on information. What? Does information that comes from the government taste better than the information from Google and Wikipedia?
I used to watch the Simpsons a lot when I was younger, so when I see that Fox News is making an idiot out of itself, I can't help but think of Kent Brockman going "This just in, flying birds are attacking ugly pigs, more at 11, but first, a word from our sponsor."
Speaking of television, it saddens me that television is slowly starting to die off. Television could do so much better if they would put better shows on the air. I admit, the most popular shows on the air are stuff like Survivor and American Idol, and you wouldn't believe how long it took me to remember the names of those shows. The problem is, while they're the most popular, how often do you hear people the next day talk about the shows at work? You don't. Give me good shows like Avatar the Last Airbender, Transformers Prime, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Star Gate SG1. Sure, you don't have people talking too much about them the next day, but they are, in my opinion, way more engaging. That doesn't mean I don't watch reality-like shows, I love Mythbusters, Ninja Warrior, Storage Wars and Pawn Stars after all, but there's no forced drama there, like there is in most reality TV series.
When I saw that copyright might just be to keep Hollywood from competing with itself, it does make me think a little. After all, who wants to compete with themselves. It's like if you cloned yourself and you and your clone went after the same person. Boy, wouldn't that be awkward.
Speaking of cloning yourself, imagine how complicated death will become when we can easily clone ourselves or transfer our minds into robot bodies. By the way, if we can do that before Stephen Hawking dies, I recommend that he gets to be the first in a robot body so we can clone him a new one.
Ironically, the day after that came out and I thought about it, it looks like some SciFi writers are thinking the same thing.
You know, if the government taxes stuff, does that mean that piracy is now legal in Germany? After all, you can only tax stuff that's legal, right? And if piracy isn't legal in Germany, then why are people getting taxed for it? That makes no sense to me.
I couldn't think of anything for this next one, but, just call Congress, call them now, get this passed somehow. Hey, that rhymes.
While Congress might be out of touch with the internet, it looks like the White House really can't understand anything, not that it's surprising, since when do politicians know anything about technology. I bet Mr. Rogers could have gotten Congress to stop trying to lock down the internet like he did with the Betamax and the VCR before.
Until next time, stay frosty.


Mmm... Corndogs...
Does it come with ketchup?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
So, what you're saying is...
He argues like a dairy farmer.
Re:
This is a pirate blog.
Citation needed
Re:
So why don't you ever contribute to the conversation then?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You don't have to be killed by a terrorist to experience a terror from their actions.
The real terrorists, as far as many people are concerned, is the U.S. government.
Bin Laden said it best...
"I no longer have to do anything. The U.S. will destroy itself with its own policies from here on out."
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
*Shakes head* You honestly have no idea what you're talking about. If you did, you'd understand, but it's quite obvious that you're trying to dumb down and simplify something that shouldn't be.
Maybe you should find out the average number of false arrests that police go through during the course of an investigation for people they think are guilty of a crime sometime.
Maybe you should look up the number of people who get tossed in prison because they were pressured into talking by the police even though they committed no crime.
Or maybe, just maybe...
You should stop running your mouth off when you understand nothing. You're like the spectator at a car accident who thinks the cars are going to explode because they crashed into each other.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I forgot, Americans don't get sarcasm.
No, you're just bad at it.
Re: Re: Re:
You didn't answer the question.
Which tells me that you wouldn't be okay with that.
BTW, did you miss the article where the police held two people, illegally, without warrants, for hours, in their homes, to get their cell phones because they recorded the police beating a man to death?
Or the countless other articles about the police arresting people for minor things? How about the articles about how the boarder patrol confiscates people's laptops and cell phones for no reason other than they can?
Re: Re: Re: And this is part of the reason why...
Nah, that was Carter, we then elected Reagan because of it, but Reagan at least tried to fix most of the problems he caused (other than Iran-Contra) when he realized they weren't working or screwed up. We got Bush Sr. and then we elected Clinton as backlash against that... So...
Re:
Not the same thing.
I know it's hard for you to rub the few brain cells you have together, but try to think.
If there are 10 people speeding down the road and 9 of them are white and the cops don't pull them over, but the 10th one is, say, Hispanic and the cops pull THEM over but ignore everyone else who speeds, THAT is what was being said.
Honestly, it's people like you that should be put on the first rocket to Mars so we don't have to deal with you here.
Re:
"I guess, then this is ok because there IS a cause, and how do you know if there is or is not a 'cause' unless you look and see?"
So, you wouldn't mind the police just coming into your house/apartment/hotel room, ransaking it while looking for drugs/guns/etc and then taking your computer, cell phone or video game system away when they're done because they don't know if there is a 'cause' to look at you unless they look and see then?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
exactly my POINT!!!!
What point?
All you've proven is that you don't understand what he was talking about.
Anyone with more than 3 brain cells knows about Nazi Germany or the USSR. Prussia's quite a bit less known.
I guess you simply DONT GET IT, it's ok, it will come to you in time.. probably.
You don't get it, you never have, you never will. You're obviously lacking in brain power. Here's a piece of advice for you. Stop drinking alcohol. You can't afford to lose anymore brain cells.
Re: Re: Re:
Tsk... You honestly have ZERO idea about anything, do you?
"So in your world (the dream one), you think if a cop looks at you, you are therefore guilty of something?"
Newsflash! Cops aren't looking for guilty or innocent people, that's for the courts to decide, they're looking for suspects to arrest when looking for clues to a crime.
So, yes, if a cop looks at you for more than a second, you can probably think that they think you're guilty of something.
You might want to understand why common advice when dealing with cops is "don't say anything and ask for a lawyer, no matter what".
Re: Re: Re:
The raw stupidity from your comments... Urgh, makes my brain hurt.
Try finding the USSR or Prussia while you're at it.
Re: Re: Re:
You know what? If I wasn't monitored and spied on by the government, I could enjoy myself more.
Fact is, you can't stop every scary thing from happening out there, you don't need to take away freedoms and liberties to give people a false sense of security, because you can't guarantee it!
Re: Re: Re:
clearly if you are innocent, it makes no difference if you are monitored or not.
Yes it does. You seem to have no idea what the government can do with that data. Even if you're innocent, the government can go "well, this data indicates that he was here at the time, so, he's guilty."
Being monitored, is not charging or conviction you of anything..
If that's the case, why are they monitoring me like this? Shouldn't I have a right to privacy?
me thinks you don't understand much.
I understand WAYYY too much. In EVERY society that has EVER come before our current ones, if people are monitored heavily, it doesn't take long for everything to be trampled on and crushed by an oppressive government. For example, look at China, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, or Eastern Europe when the USSR had control of it.
Do you REALLY want the U.S. to go down that route?
Re:
Again, you miss the point of his comment.
How old are you anyway? Or maybe you're IQ is too low to understand the context of his comment?
Then again... When you say stuff like this...
I tried to look up Nazi Germany on Google maps and I could not find it!!!
It pretty much tells me that you're a complete buffoon.
Re:
I would rather live in a world/country where I could get killed by a terrorist attack than one where the government watches my every move.
You miss the point of his statement completely.
There are BILLIONS of calls, every day by millions of Americans, BILLIONS of texts every day, etc by Americans. In WHAT way does it make sense to monitor ALL of that?!
So according to this idiot, if you simply tell the security services you are no threat that is somehow supposed to prove you are no threat?
Ever hear of the phrase "innocent until proven guilty"? You must not have. Allow me to explain then. You could be accused of a crime or someone could think you're a threat, but until they prove it or you do something to prove it, they can't stop you from doing what you're doing so long as you're not endangering lives or putting others at risk.
See, some of us, apparently not you, were brought up under the idea of Innocent Until Proven Guilty when it comes to law enforcement in America.
What the NSA is doing is going "everyone's guilty unless they can prove their innocence".
Deja Vu...
For some reason, I swear I've seen this article before.
Re: Re: Devils Advocate
You mean, work at a bank?