Silverscarcat's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the stay-frosty dept
Hey, Techdirt readers. What's up? Yeah, looks like it's my turn to pick my favorite posts of the week. Lots of stuff was covered this week, so how about we get into it?
I've always been interested in various copyright laws, since I, like many fans, tend to use the "gray" area of copyright known as fanfiction and fanart. Really, it's just a good story or good artwork that can get me interested in a show easier than anything else.
And it's because of that that when I see stuff like SOPA, PIPA, ACTA and TPP that I get worried. Stuff that I and many others enjoy would suddenly no longer be protected by safe harbors that's afforded by the DMCA.
Which is why when I see the weak response that the White House puts out about their stance about ACTA, it's both worrying and angering. After all, the internet should be free and not limited because businesses can't innovate.
Speaking of things that can't innovate, the RIAA seems to think that making new laws will stop piracy. I think we need to get the RIAA and MPAA execs in a room and give them a full history of Prohibition and the results of that. Or maybe the war on drugs, which has done nothing to stop people from getting the drugs and instead just increased the prison populations.
Of course, when they realize that stakeholders are no longer able to fit in one room, maybe then they'll start to understand the internet a little more. This is the internet and information age, we're connected all over the world and people force businesses to increase their customer service or lose business.
Speaking of the internet, it's pretty sad that there's all these data caps on information. What? Does information that comes from the government taste better than the information from Google and Wikipedia?
I used to watch the Simpsons a lot when I was younger, so when I see that Fox News is making an idiot out of itself, I can't help but think of Kent Brockman going "This just in, flying birds are attacking ugly pigs, more at 11, but first, a word from our sponsor."
Speaking of television, it saddens me that television is slowly starting to die off. Television could do so much better if they would put better shows on the air. I admit, the most popular shows on the air are stuff like Survivor and American Idol, and you wouldn't believe how long it took me to remember the names of those shows. The problem is, while they're the most popular, how often do you hear people the next day talk about the shows at work? You don't. Give me good shows like Avatar the Last Airbender, Transformers Prime, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Star Gate SG1. Sure, you don't have people talking too much about them the next day, but they are, in my opinion, way more engaging. That doesn't mean I don't watch reality-like shows, I love Mythbusters, Ninja Warrior, Storage Wars and Pawn Stars after all, but there's no forced drama there, like there is in most reality TV series.
When I saw that copyright might just be to keep Hollywood from competing with itself, it does make me think a little. After all, who wants to compete with themselves. It's like if you cloned yourself and you and your clone went after the same person. Boy, wouldn't that be awkward.
Speaking of cloning yourself, imagine how complicated death will become when we can easily clone ourselves or transfer our minds into robot bodies. By the way, if we can do that before Stephen Hawking dies, I recommend that he gets to be the first in a robot body so we can clone him a new one.
Ironically, the day after that came out and I thought about it, it looks like some SciFi writers are thinking the same thing.
You know, if the government taxes stuff, does that mean that piracy is now legal in Germany? After all, you can only tax stuff that's legal, right? And if piracy isn't legal in Germany, then why are people getting taxed for it? That makes no sense to me.
I couldn't think of anything for this next one, but, just call Congress, call them now, get this passed somehow. Hey, that rhymes.
While Congress might be out of touch with the internet, it looks like the White House really can't understand anything, not that it's surprising, since when do politicians know anything about technology. I bet Mr. Rogers could have gotten Congress to stop trying to lock down the internet like he did with the Betamax and the VCR before.
Until next time, stay frosty.


Re:
As my friend, GH points out...
And this is some strong language, but bear with me.
It isn't here because as much as the 'PC master race' likes to stroke itself, the real winner in the end is the goddamn smartphone. Let's be honest once and for all, the smartphone market is outselling, all by itself, PC AND consoles combined, isn't losing steam in the slightest, and is bringing in enormous profits for little effort for devs and publishers.
In the end, the tiny little piece of shit phones that every hipster twat shows off are the real winner, and the 'hardcore' gamers and 'PC master race' can just watch and gnash their teeth because for all PCs are more versatile, they lack the sheer selling power that smartphones have.
Smartphones are really ruining everything nowadays...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Dont like it?? DONT BUY IT
Exactly. I found some games for the PS3 in the 5 dollar bargain bin used and I was like "sweet, cheap game, if it sux, well, I'm only out five bucks."
Turned out to be a fairly decent game as well.
Re: Re: Re: Just another politician.
The problem is with the debt problem, the government doesn't make the paper money, the banks do. (Fractional Reserve Lending)
In order to fix the debt problem, the banks can't be allowed to do FRL anymore and the government has to set how much money gets made every year with strict guidelines.
Of course, there's more to it, but that's the basic gist of it.
Re: Re: Re: Just another politician.
Ron Paul's been consistent with most of his positions over the years.
Which is, despite his ideas at times, the biggest draw to him.
There's some hypocrisy, but we're human, we're all hypocrites, but at the same time, he was always against wars like Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, the bombings that Clinton did in in the late 90s, he was against the sanctions of Iraq, stating that something bad would happen to the US (back in 1998 he called that). He warned against the Housing Bubble Collapse in 2003/2004, he wanted to get rid of paper money and replace it with coined money (as it's harder to manipulate), even if I disagree with his position on it needing to be gold or silver, at least he's always been consistent about it.
Paul wanted to pull troops home from around the world and turn the money that the US was spending on foreign entanglements towards our infrastructure...
So, yeah, his ideas might not always be the best ones, but looking at his record, he was the best candidate that never became President.
Also, he never voted for raising pay for members of Congress.
Re: Re: Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.
So says the person attacking others.
Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
Here's a little something for you...
Had it been Prenda and not Kim, you and your ilk would be defending his actions 1000%.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
It's his standard operating procedure to attack the person since he's incapable of attacking their position.
You mean like how you attack Mike and nearly everyone else on this board?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
*Snicker* Aww! Someone needs a bottle.
I said I lived on my own since I was 16, not that I was kicked out of my house when I was 16.
Aww... The little moron is so cute when he's trying to be a tough guy.
Who's an adorable little troll?
Yes you is! Yes you is! Aww! Such a good little twoll!
You must make your mommy proud.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
He's having trouble finding personal attack vectors with me.
More like he doesn't try because you make it too easy.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
Ah! I thought you were familiar.
The internet tough guy.
*Snicker*
So, how's your mommy's basement been treating you lately?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
Oh please, I'd rather be a piracy apologist than a copyright apologist who's nothing but a hypocrite.
Copyright Apologists just love ruining people's lives for the sake of a few dollars more.
if I was in a foxhole with any of you scumbags, I might do something horrible.
Like listen to music that I downloaded without paying you.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
Maybe because there's more here than normal? Maybe the only thing different about this is in your mind? Maybe because it's Kim Dotcom and you auto-hate him and think he should be hung without a trial? Maybe because it's someone who's ACCUSED of copyright infringement that has you and AJ and others with your panties in a knot?
Take your pick, they're all likely correct.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
If he had his assets not frozen, he could properly defend himself.
Plus, as we've been saying, if Megaupload loses, then how long until other websites start getting bullied by the U.S. government over copyright infringement?
Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous
Hey, AJ, can you stop denying that you've been payed by your masters at the MAFIAA and just be honest for once? Any chance you could just admit it? Thanks.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!
As I said before, Megaupload was protected by Safe Harbors as they followed the DMCA in taking down any file that was said to be infringing.
The only reason they left that one up was because law enforcement said to not take it down.
They got screwed over by the law for following the law.
So, even if you think that other companies would be unaffected because they have Safe Harbors, remember that Megaupload did as well, and look at what happened.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art
And you, and other apologists, don't see the problem if Megaupload loses, do you?
That's because, unlike other copyright and patent trolls, and I disagree with Dotcom on this issue, but unlike others who only seek to gain money and do nothing else, the Megaupload case DOES apply to other internet companies. If Megaupload loses, it won't be long before the MAFIAAA decides that if they can take down Megaupload, why not try for Youtube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, ETC.?
There's more at stake here than someone being a patent troll, which is unlike other patent trolls which just seek to cause disruption in the market place.
If Megaupload fails in court, then the entire internet community could be in trouble.
Remember how we reacted to SOPA?
Re:
But that would be reasonable!
:P
And THIS is why...
I make sure my phone isn't in my pants.
Re: Re: Read for comprehension!
what's going to happen that would affect others like Google? They are already protected by the DMCA
So was Megaupload, they followed the DMCA, still had the safe harbors, the only reason they didn't take down one file was because law enforcement told them not to.
So, by following the law, they got screwed over by the law.
You think that wouldn't be something Google, Facebook or Twitter should worry about?
Re: Re: Re: Prior Art
Did you even read the article or are you just blowing smoke out of your ass again?
First of all, if you read it, Mike's not condoning this behavior at all.
Secondly, if Megaupload does go to trial and loses because Dotcom can't get the finances to fund his defense properly, how long until Google, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and other sites start getting hit with the same problems that Megaupload got hit with? I'd assume not very long.
So, even if it's something that none of us really like (and if it was anyone BUT Megaupload, you would be cheering for them suing Google, Facebook and Twitter), the fact is, the alternative of Megaupload losing the case is BAD for the rest of the internet.
Or is your brain too alcohol-inebriated to understand that?