And I demand to be paid! I generated the idea after all, everything else was just implementation and the real hard work... ;)
"dilution" Brand delusion is what Stetson is currently experiencing
Depends on whether those higher up are on what side. You get people like Joe Arpaio heading things up, and the bullies survive while the "law and order" types get pushed out.
The courts are a branch of the government. They're deferring to the Executive branch. So much for checks and balances.
I think he's just drawing analogies from your story to many other common themes here on Techdirt. I wouldn't take it as an insult.
Just because the person perpetrating it doesn't get sexual gratification doesn't make it any less sexual assault.
No, there's no such thing as perpetual motion. But this could significantly cut the energy bills of an amusement park. Something doesn't have to be perfect to make it better than what exists.
They're not LEO's, but they're sure as hell trained to act like them. THAT is the problem. They're not trained to look for dangers, they're trained on how to confront and cow passengers into following the asinine rules. Because the rules are paramount to EVERYTHING.
Aye. I'll sometimes toss in some soy sauce, too. Frozen veggies make a great addition about halfway through boiling the noodles (peas, carrots, beans, stuff that boils well). Sometimes adding a can of tuna is good too, after cooking when you're mixing it all together.
All kinds of great ways to enjoy your mac & "cheese" ;)
I humbly suggest the instructor retitle it "Kick the Crap Dinner". It'd piss Kraft off to no end, and I can't imagine how it'd be legally actionable. Especially if it can ride in on a wave of publicity after this stunt.
Personal responsibility? Shitty luck? What's that? Someone's responsible, and it could never be me. I'm entitled to an entirely safe existence no matter what boneheaded crap I do, damnit. It's the American way!
If this goes through, how much standing will Monsanto have left?
The problem is that people used those sub-domains for all kinds of things. I have a "subdomain" like was seized that I use to connect to my computers at home when I'm away. I'm sure many people run various game servers or have other hobbies that may not just be web pages, and you're defending the right of the government to unilaterally stop all of those useful services with no evidence or trial?
Hell, any one of those subdomains could have had hundreds of thousands of pages. YOU DON'T KNOW. The way the DNS system works, those subdomains were all on different IPs, so yes, there were 84,000 people who had their connection to DNS cut off suddenly.
I don't know if you're playing Devil's Advocate or just a myopic, uneducated asshole, but there is no defense for seizing the domain with no evidence that even the preponderance or even a significant fraction of the subdomains were participating in anything illegal, much less without a trial.
This story didn't say that the breaking of encryption was legal. Just that it wasn't criminal. They could still be open to and lose civil lawsuits. It's just that the government is stepping out of direct prosecution.
All I know is that I used to read the NYT, but I've hit their annoy-wall enough times that I don't even click on links going there any more.
He had the benefit of the doubt the first time. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." He proved he was incompetent once. I'm not holding out high hopes he's going to magically become more competent.
These CEOs and such are all golf buddies. It has nothing to do with skill or talent. It's all in who you know.
So you're saying that we shouldn't question the government ever? And that people who see things going wrong should just keep their head low and ignore it?
I've got some reading for you:
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007392
If you don't stand up for what's right right now, you won't get the chance to in the future.
"I was just following orders when I killed those Jews. It wasn't my fault"
I'd think so, as long as you did it legally and filled it back up with personal money and not on the government's dime. If they allow personal use, they allow personal use.
Re: Re: Re: Lots of ire against police officers.
That excuse does not work for the average citizen. Why in the FUCK should it work for an officer, whose livelihood is based on his enforcement of the law, and therefore knowledge?