Good analysis and shows that we can hold off on those 'stupid judges' comments.
However looking at the basic argument of the case, there is someone who is being a complete idiot for thinking that a trademarked product somehow gives you rights to pictures of that product.
We can only hope that in the Motion to Dismiss is als to consider CAR-FRESHNR a Vexatious litigant and sanction their Lawyers for bringing this forard.
Re: Motion to Dismiss vs. Summary Judgment
Good analysis and shows that we can hold off on those 'stupid judges' comments.
However looking at the basic argument of the case, there is someone who is being a complete idiot for thinking that a trademarked product somehow gives you rights to pictures of that product.
We can only hope that in the Motion to Dismiss is als to consider CAR-FRESHNR a Vexatious litigant and sanction their Lawyers for bringing this forard.
Re: "Moron in a hurry"
Nuf said.