And it's not as though the footage can't be exonerating as often as it is damning.
This might be persuasive to a Sheriff who ran a department where people were held accountable for their actions.
After the students receive the payouts, can we expect the sheriff to initiate a lengthy series of civil asset forfeitures from the students and their families? I would almost be disappointed in the sheriff if he didn't try to reclaim that $3M (plus expenses), or do something equally stupid.
So is Old Town Brewing's liquor license going to mysteriously disappear? Will they have a fire of unknown origin? Surprise audits? Rezoning? I'm sure they have a fun time ahead of them...
Obviously this is not the brightest cop. He must have mistaken "Terrier" for "Terrorist" and thought that not only his life, but the lives of the people around him (not their pets, screw their pets) were in danger and start shooting like his hero, Yosemite Sam, would do.
There is the opportunity cost in that those people could have (theoretically) been doing something useful with the time instead wasted on this case.
I would guess that most of those nine shots subdued non-compliant shrubbery instead of the primary target. 15 feet can be a pretty challenging distance for some shooters. Obviously the 2-3 shots that did hit Zion, according to his Mom's attorney, were more than sufficient to incapacitate him.
Were I a Trump supporter, I would be thrilled to see his Twitter account voluntarily disabled in the hopes that he would use a more dignified method of communications (as he seemingly can't use Twitter in a dignified manner). As it is, I appreciate (but don't follow) his Twitter account for the combination of humor and horror that it unintentionally provides. Either way, Trump, as a U.S. citizen, has the right to express himself however he wants to and supporters and detractors should condemn moves like this. Anyone who supports this can't complain when the same thing happens to their preferred politician.
I always liked the taste test, as seen on TV. That cops have sufficient experience to taste an unknown substance and then tell the audience what kind of drug it is, is at the least humorous.Most popular Google search after this is enacted as policy: "How to disguise dog poop as illegal drugs".
Simple solution: either people without a criminal record are not held pending results from a real drug test by competent personnel, or people cleared by such a test are reimbursed for their salary and expenses for the duration held. The arresting officer should also have to explain, in person, to the family and employer of the person held, that they were the ones who mistook a piece of donut for an illegal substance. The officer should also be forced to wear a 'Keystone Cops' badge for the same amount of time that the person was held.
I'm guessing most would go with the first option.
FOIA Exemption 6:Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual's personal privacy.
Seems like any e-mails to or from Tea Leaves might be exempted. Any additional potentially responsive e-mails could be rejected using the rule the banks bought:
FOIA Exemption 8: Information that concerns the supervision of financial institutions.
Might not be entirely (or even very) fitting, but they would get points for irony. Most of the e-mail that remains would likely be campaign ads and other junk mail.
That money might be better spent on her opponent in the next election.
Thanksgiving is typically the holiday where we bring out some overstuffed turkey, which is then shoved down people's throats. Pai is just so used to hearing analogies between his policy and turkeys that he's forgotten there's an actual bird with that name.
So has the person who took the video been arrested for 'something' yet? Or will they just be harassed once the spotlight is off the police?
The question isn't 'if', but 'how quickly and to what extent'I imagine Mr. Pai is already loosening the belt on his trenchcoat and applying lube while still in the cab on the way to telecom HQ.
Later this week the unnamed cop will be filing a new round of lawsuits, this time suing the rock, the hashtag #flyingrock, the musical style of Rock'n'Roll, the towns of Rockford and Rockville (he believes the rock may have been raised in one of them), and the Mesozoic era.
In other words, the FBI can't be trusted.That's a matter of perspective. From the FBI's perspective, it's the prosecutor who can't be trusted. For everyone else, it's what you said.
Don't you think that the poor people with that phone number have been harassed enough already?When I called them they said they had not, but for $9.99/minute I could harass them all I wanted. YMMV with area code.
Where this analogy fails is in the 'abduct' part:
abduct
verb
1. take (someone) away illegally by force or deception;
Kidnap is often used as a synonym, but this use fails the 'illegal' part. Using words incorrectly does not strengthen an argument.
Does this mean that PETA lawyers can't hold copyrights?
There's a market opportunity here
Cue some cheap insurance company offering car insurance for $183...