" ...Americans are (if that hadn't been made clear in recent years) immeasurably susceptible to bullshit."
Well, we're not here to fuck spiders, mate!
Agreed. But my point is Valve played dirty, too. Steam got so big because Valve made its use mandatory for a game that was highly anticipated, and it was a kick in the groin for those of us who had purchased a boxed disc then discovered we could not even do single player until downloading some crapware we had never heard of and had no desire to use (bonus kicks for those of us who were still on dial-up at the time). It was not a consumer-friendly move. Now Epic is trying something to jump-start their store, and everyone is freaking out about someone pissing on St. Steam.
Check out Playnite, "...an open source video game library manager with one simple goal: To provide a unified interface for all of your games." Unfortunately you do still have to have those other clients installed for games requiring them. But Playnite will launch the appropriate client in the background when required when you select to play a game.
"... forcing people to either get what they want from a platform they otherwise wouldn't bother with or go without.." Just like when Valve forced me to use Steam to play my boxed copy of Half-Life 2, right? I'm just saying Epic is not the only bad guy or even the worst guy. My favorite digital distribution platform is GOG: a web page that sells DRM-free downloads I can install anywhere, anytime, without using a proprietary launcher or storefront.
Every launcher/client I mentioned above, including Steam, has been or is considered spyware by many. They do collect personal info, track what games you play and how long to play the, collect hardware info, and who knows what else they collect and report without full disclosure. That's unfortunately part of the price of the convenience of digital purchases.
I honestly don't get why people who buy games are so upset by Epic. So what if a game is exclusive to Epic or Steam or any other PC platform? There is no monetary cost to using another platform. Sure, it is annoying to have to have these and Origin and Uplay and Battle.net, but that's just a fact of 2019 digital distribution, whether or not games are exclusive. I shared, nay, wallowed in the outrage when Battlefield 3 required Origin to launch, but guess what? I got over it, and now I just enjoy the games regardless of platform.
In the end, I do not see this as being bad for consumers. I am not naive enough to think the savings will be reflected in the sales prices, or that EA or Activision will reinvest the savings into game development, but that possibility does exist for smaller and indie developers/publishers.
On a tangent, GOG Galaxy is optional, but I find myself using it anyway because it is easy to see all my GOG games in one place, and download or uninstall from there. And you can always use Playnite as a universal launcher. You still have to install those other launchers, but at least you can see all your games in one place.
Work is hard. Now everyone want money for nothin, and their chicks for free.
The fragmentation is frustrating, but my Roku does a pretty good job of telling me what streaming services offer what I want to watch. But if that selection is not available on Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, or something else I already pay for, I am not interested in paying for yet another streaming service.
Sorry, Disney, but pulling the Star Wars franchise from Netflix is not going to convince me to pay for your service. I will seek out, ahem, "alternative" methods of watching what I want to watch, and you will miss out on earning ANYTHING from my viewing. How can you have any pudding if you won't eat your meat?
"On the contrary, article 13 will indeed break fair use, leaving piracy once again as the sole convenient source of entertainment. We're basically back to the 1990's." Dibs on "Napster!"
Maybe he should try to copyright and patent it, too. Surely one of those will stick!
Can Monster Energy and Monster Cable go after each other and both go broke?
"...Germany Caves To France..."
Those words have never been written before, and will never be written again.
This is the most positive thing I have read, seen, or heard all day.
So moron in a hurry can distinguish between a pet food and an awards show, but said show's presumably college-educated attorneys can't? It's cheaper to be a moron, and apparently smarter.
I haven't bougt Bud Light in quite a while, but I am going to go buy some as soon as I am sober enough todrive.
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not. I rated it as funny, but in case it's not sarcasm, I'll respond to that.
Did you even read the whole article, or just the headline? The whole point of the article is that the developer understands, and even admits, that these unauthorized downloads are NOT lost sales. They were never-sales - many of the downloaders never had any intention of buying the game, with lack of disposable income being one possible factor. Who knows; it may even increase sales - the ones that used it as a demo may buy it if they like it, but without that initial download they may not have ever purchased it.
"Jerdine, like many people who don't understand search engines, the internet, intellectual property law, or the Streisand effect, seems to believe if he shouts "TRADEMARK and/or COPYRIGHT" loudly enough, magical things will happen."
Too often this is true, with today's enforcement agencies and judicial system putting the burden of proof on the accused.
Dicks.
Missouri guy here...
*turns Mizzou shirt inside-out and covers face as I slink away in shame