The developer has changed the look of the widgets and they are back in the market.
Are these going to be **AA sponsored "technical skills training" courses?
Sadly, that's probably not as far fetched of a question as it should be.
He was referring to the protected version specifically more than the actual audio format which was very restrictive in what you could do with it.
As has been mentioned, the ipod/itunes had the same type of very restricted format early on and still became a hit because it was a great way to carry thousands of songs around with you easily.
With books, I don't think there is really as much of an interest in having all of your books with you at all times because they aren't consumed constantly and repeatedly like music is.
"Also, why would ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, and so on offer content for free online if they can't sell commercial time during television broadcasts?"
Who says they can't sell commercial time?
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&sid=atKGiQOMco.Y
@DS78: Inflation... It would technically be possible to make a copy of the money without removing it from the bank. Most of your "money" in the bank is just a number on the computer and not physical dollar bills. Making copy would just involve changing the number on your account.
Some of these comments seem off topic...this article is about the resale of physical pieces of art (paintings, sculptures, etc) and has nothing to do with music.
"just because the devices might also be occasionally misused."
I think it's more than likely that they will be highly misused unless they are somehow restricted which would mean most kids are still going to have a regular phone that can do regular texting and stuff. In that situation, I doubt any kid is going to want to have a second phone that they can use just for school stuff.
The number is 3.6/year for the wii to 4.6 or so for ps3 and 360 so it isn't as much of a difference as the article would suggest. If there are so many "casual" people buying no other games, then there would have to be a lot of people buying a lot more than 3.6/year to get the number even that high.
I agree that they appear to be lieing about needing to upgrade to digital cable, but the prices in the consumerist article look like the price for a DVR box ($6.50) and DVR service ($10.95). At least they appear to be close to what time warner charges for each. The actual cost of a basic digital cable box that does not record is quite a bit less I think.
And TW just announced they will put some HBO (owned by TW) content online so you can use up your monthly limit even quicker...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/business/media/21hbo.html?ref=business
You could say the RIAA is "winning" most of the cases where people decide to settle.....that doesn't necessarily mean the defendants in those cases did anything wrong.
How is this different than a firmware update on anything offering a new feature?
I'll file this in the category of "Another reason that if Apple had control of the PC Market they would be a bigger monopoly than Microsoft is."
"If I were Jobs, I'd launch a tablet that used the iPhone OS, had access to the app store"
I just wonder if people are willing to have a computer that is limited to the high walls of the app store? Would you really want every program on your computer to have to go through apple?