The photographer completely infringed on the implied copyright of God, on two counts.
First, the image that was captured on film was of a object created by God on a background created by God.
Second, the image of the first post was only possible after the image was recreated by the ocular device created by God and chosen to be worthy by the processes of a brain created by God.
The only possible conclusion is that the photographer owes God two dollars.
There is a harassment restraining order, and the just ruled he cannot do anything that he intends to upset her. Seems logical to me. (But I don't mean to infer the legal system is logical.) Some of his rights were taken away when the HRO was put in place.
That MusicUnlimited advertisement is horrid! For moving my mouse I am rewarded with a black loading screen for 5 seconds! In my world 5 seconds is a long time. Not even a visible way to cancel it after 2 seconds.
The ad works, obviously I'll remember the MusicUnlimited name for at least a short while, but the opportunity to accidentally rollover a time-waster is an adventure I'd rather not take. That's certainly negative reinforcement for visiting a Techdirt page.
"legally binding the US to a trade agreement without no congressional authorization"
"Without no"? One of the terms which is the opposite of both "without any" and "with no"?
So, strickly speaking, that means "legally binding the US to a trade agreement with congressional authorization" ... which does not seem to be the issue described by Mike, et alia.
I've perused Techdirt for years, and this is the first time I've been compelled to go grammar-nazi. I hope my digression is more excusable than this error.
Cloksin: "Obviously these backups are NOT a regular occurance... since the article said the traffic light went out!"
Obviously you did not read said article well, because, obviously, the article states "Ehrlich said the Sept. 8 incident wasn’t the first and that the light goes out regularly."
Mmm, I was hoping to see a ruling such that it's illegal to have a "like" button while omitting a "dislike" button, as any following statistics will be criminally skewed.
'Correct' is not so well defined. Perhaps it is correct to defend your convictions no matter whether particular subsets of society agree, rather than sell out for the almighty dollar.
See also
In other news, Robin Williams has died.
Re: Human Trumps Radioactive Dinosaur
Godzilla-proofing is far easier than Idiot-proofing.
Lifetime subscription
I paid $1200 for a lifetime subscription to Techdirt. Do I get a refund?
Total Infringement
The photographer completely infringed on the implied copyright of God, on two counts.
First, the image that was captured on film was of a object created by God on a background created by God.
Second, the image of the first post was only possible after the image was recreated by the ocular device created by God and chosen to be worthy by the processes of a brain created by God.
The only possible conclusion is that the photographer owes God two dollars.
Cattle-prods work.
Way back in '86 our physics teacher was using a hog-shocker applied to the metal door knob to train students to not be late to class.
Okay to me.
There is a harassment restraining order, and the just ruled he cannot do anything that he intends to upset her. Seems logical to me. (But I don't mean to infer the legal system is logical.) Some of his rights were taken away when the HRO was put in place.
Re: no, not Rude
Dammit, I'm neither anonymous, nor a coward.
Re: Living on the edge
I'm surprise the bomb range was within even 15 or so miles of residents, let alone just half a mile.
Learn something every day
What's the 10,000 hour rule for mastery?
The Other Agenda
That MusicUnlimited advertisement is horrid! For moving my mouse I am rewarded with a black loading screen for 5 seconds! In my world 5 seconds is a long time. Not even a visible way to cancel it after 2 seconds.
The ad works, obviously I'll remember the MusicUnlimited name for at least a short while, but the opportunity to accidentally rollover a time-waster is an adventure I'd rather not take. That's certainly negative reinforcement for visiting a Techdirt page.
The Anti-Marm
" ...there are several sentences just plain wrong."
Any errors are not likely to be much worse than your
Double negatives are unconstitutional
"legally binding the US to a trade agreement without no congressional authorization"
"Without no"? One of the terms which is the opposite of both "without any" and "with no"?
So, strickly speaking, that means "legally binding the US to a trade agreement with congressional authorization" ... which does not seem to be the issue described by Mike, et alia.
I've perused Techdirt for years, and this is the first time I've been compelled to go grammar-nazi. I hope my digression is more excusable than this error.
Re: Re: Mr. Obvious.
Cloksin: "Obviously these backups are NOT a regular occurance... since the article said the traffic light went out!"
Obviously you did not read said article well, because, obviously, the article states "Ehrlich said the Sept. 8 incident wasn’t the first and that the light goes out regularly."
Re: Re: Why isn't the PD being sued as well?
$60 is reasonable, and beyond the scope of the article.
Criminal Dislike
Mmm, I was hoping to see a ruling such that it's illegal to have a "like" button while omitting a "dislike" button, as any following statistics will be criminally skewed.
Re: Make It News... Not Entertainment
"if you give it away for free it has a better chance of remaining unbiased news."
I think that's a sound theory, but I'm curious if it established. Can you cite any sources or names of this phenomenon?
Re: Mendenhall should have been a miner...
'Correct' is not so well defined. Perhaps it is correct to defend your convictions no matter whether particular subsets of society agree, rather than sell out for the almighty dollar.
New underground service market?
Seems it will become profitable for those skilled enough to encrypt/encapsulate to download for those that don't have the ability or desire.
Ah, is this then actually a plot to reallocate some of the general populace's cash to those that are more computer savvy? Weeeeeee!