Josef Anvil's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the the-web-kids-revolution-was-not-televised dept
We've come to the end of another week at Techdirt, and I have to say that for once, I'm not completely outraged about "the system." The reason for my renewed sense of optimism comes from stringing together my favorite Techdirt posts for the week.
Hmmm. I just reread that and it didn't seem right, as I don't really have a list of favorite posts for the week. Instead I see quite a few posts that all support my single FAVORITE post of the week. Yes, there is one single clear winner this week that really needs to be addressed. Before I talk about that post, I want to look at the framework around it and will try to be quick.
Crowdsourcing an innovation agenda, sounds cool and it could be the start of something. It even seems that it's not a matter of "if" it develops but rather "how," since people are tackling the issue from different angles and with new platforms. Then we have crowdfunding which not only seems to be working but is picking up steam and is yet another one of those things that is just fun to watch.
Next we have the stories about the Bodog.com takedown and the aftermath of the Megaupload.com takedown and, as usual, the internet routes around the damage and most users of those services barely notice. They wake up and their service is gone, so they move to the next one. Then leading up to the big finish we have to look at being right vs being realistic, piracy vs innovation, and online vs offline rules, which are all looks at how the internet has changed the world in which we live.
So where does all of this lead? To Glyn Moody's article about the "We, the Web Kids" manifesto, my FAVORITE post of the week and possibly my favorite post EVER on Techdirt. This one article encapsulates almost everything that is discussed in this forum. Whether the debate is about SOPA/PIPA/ACTA/TPP or TSA or RIAA/MPAA or WIPO or Google or Facebook, we have to accept the fact that we are all far more connected than ever before, some of us are even hyperconnected, and it has changed us. We no longer just accept the opinions of "authority," we want FACTS, we want data, we want the truth (or close as possible). This article details a fundamental shift in the way people THINK, and it's not just the "web kids." Personally, I didn't grow up with the web, but I'm certainly not so blind as to miss how integrated into my life it is. Before the web, I didn't talk to people all over the world on a daily basis, now I do. How I consume media is completely different, as I get to choose what, when, how, and why. In other words, the way things are done has CHANGED because of the internet.
This manifesto is a wake up call to politicians and corporations around the world. Your citizens and consumers have changed. They are becoming or have become a part of the digital era. They Skype, Tweet, FB, and IM their ideas, opinions, and comments without giving much thought about the process. They Google everything, they shop on their phones, they record video and post it before the "real news" can, they text while in meetings, they create with Gimp and NVU, they work with OpenOffice, and they consume media thru Netflix, HULU, Spotify, Grooveshark, HuffPo, and YouTube. They want to throw away physical storage and move stuff into the "cloud," if you let them. They don't want to hear that consumers shouldn't dictate the market, because they know how to write reviews and share information. They don't want to hear about laws being bought, and are willing to speak out and challenge the "old ways."
One last point I would like to focus on, in the manifesto, which I found particularly engaging is the awareness of CwF + RtB, albeit heavily focused on RtB. In the digital world, we realize there isn't much of a cost for packaging or distribution and so naturally we don't see any reason to pay for those things. "But...but...but... the content is so valuable." NO, it's not. Charge me $9.99 for an ebook, and see how fast I discover new authors who will charge me $.99 or $.10 for content that is just as good. For $9.99, I want more than just pages of content that I can't resell.
Sadly, because the content industry controls the broadcast medium, the digital revolution was not televised.

Wait for it...
Seems that all of the big players should keep a close eye on Google. Google is lighting up fiber networks and it might not be long until they cover those same areas with WiMax or similar 4G service.
My best guess is that Google has done the math and realizes that the profit on IP traffic is insanely high. So they can compete with the big players by offering service at say 300% mark up instead of 30,000% mark up and look like saints.
The Magical Interwebs
Once again we get to see that the interwebs MUST be treated differently than all other communications platforms because...
Well because its the interwebs and we just don't understand it.
Re: Re: Re: Unions R not needed -- NO, clearly ARE!
OOTB's post actually made sense and then came that batshit crazy reply.
Capitalism is an economic system
Then you claim that France and Holland are socialist countries, which they are not, as proof that capitalism sucks? Because France and Holland both use capitalism as their economic system.
Then you bring in Communism which you declare as evil. The system isn't evil, the people that manipulate it are evil. Pssst capitalism can be the economic system in a communist state.
In short, spend some more time in school or use the internet to actually research what words mean before using them in a public space where people can highlight your insanity.
Re: Re: The IRS should be used to go after real crooks: The Rich.
"The rich" are not inherently crooks, but in general they have the means to influence policy and their general slant is counter productive and harmful.
There is an excellent talk on TED that completely debunks the hypothesis that "the rich" are job creators. The crux of the argument is that job creation is an expense and is the last resort of any business. In other words, reducing taxes on the wealthy does not spur job creation, but rather increases wealth which is not proportionately distributed into the economy. Consumers are the actual engine of growth. If demand rises then jobs need to be created to handle demand.
The point being, that "the rich" have historically allowed their greed to drive societies to the brink of implosion.
Re:
See, Mike.
Copyright provided an incentive to create...
Residual income and lawsuits
Abolition of IP laws
Mostly harmless.
Re: Until you clowns devise some other suite to protect efforts,
"No one is going to expend efforts if anyone can take the product and use it as theirs."
Unfortunately the ENTIRETY of human history disagrees with that statement.
Re: Re: Democrats protected by the political stupidity of Republican Party
"There are plenty of Republicans who believe in evolution, too (although I'm not sure how that's a personal freedom as opposed to a scientific theory.)"
Plenty??? Why not ALL???
Why is that important? Well let's see. Would you vote for anyone who questioned the theory of GRAVITY or ATOMS or any other thoroughly established scientific theory. On the opposition side we always hear, but but but it's only a theory... In science a theory is a hypothesis with soooo much evidence that to not accept it as fact is insane.
How can we expect people that don't accept scientific fact to fix IP issues or any other complex issues?
Re:
"It's not bags of money shifting hands, but it appears highly questionable to the public, leading the public to trust Congress a lot less."
"the president and CEO of Aegis LLC a 'security' defense contractor company, whom she helped to secure a $10 billion (with a b) contract with the State Department."
Reconcile the two quotes please.
Re: Re: OT
Terrorist attack!!! Oh noooooooo!!!
What did we call explosions and other bad shit before everything was terrorism?
Re:
LoL The public is behind the war on terror. Don't you read the news???
22 year old tackled by a concerned citizen for "suspiciously" running away from a bomb blast in Boston. Anyone who looks Muslim and runs away from a bomb blast has to be a terrorist.
Who else would do such a thing?
Re: Re: A pipe dream
The problem with this line of thought is that Congress has to pass any law on term limits.
So we are all hoping that the people who benefit the most from unlimited terms will cut off their source of income and influence. Maybe they will cut their pay too, and limit their health insurance and pensions.
Yeah, and then copyrights will roll back to 10 years.
Re: Re: EXACTLY
Oh how I wish this were actually true. If that many 14 year olds were actually so aware of what goes on in Congress, we could be assured that our current representatives won't have their jobs much longer.
Sadly, this is not reality.
WTF?
"Justice Scalia followed that up by asking why would anyone invent anything if they can't get a patent?"
Ummmm see a need and fill it? Maybe humans feel the need to improve their quality of life? Just to see if it can be done?
Re: Re: Re: News flash
This just in...
Old man yells at cloud. Blames cloud for earthquake, but not rain.
Since when ????
“Hoang did not present any testimony, documents, or other evidence supporting her damages allegations of lost income and profits. Neither Hoang nor her agent Joe Kolkowitz—her only two witnesses on damages—offered any testimony about future damages, and neither offered competent testimony on which a reasonable jury could base an award of damages for acting jobs allegedly lost to date.”
Since when does Hollywood require actual proof of loss or damages????
Seems like Ms Hoang should have classified her birthdate as IP and then sued for copyright infringement.
Re: Is anyone else bothered by this????
Hey I only clicked the submit button once. No idea why it posted 3 times. Sorry about that.
Is anyone else bother by this????
Ummmm, "key safety data" ??
WTF does that mean? I thought we were talking about plants. Shit that grows and people eat it. I hear farming has been around for years.
So "key safety data" is either:
A) Bullshit made up to keep prices artificially high OR
B) It's real, and we should all be worried about just how genetically altered the plants are.
Is anyone else bother by this????
Ummmm, "key safety data" ??
WTF does that mean? I thought we were talking about plants. Shit that grows and people eat it. I hear farming has been around for years.
So "key safety data" is either:
A) Bullshit made up to keep prices artificially high OR
B) It's real, and we should all be worried about just how genetically altered the plants are.
Is anyone else bother by this????
Ummmm, "key safety data" ??
WTF does that mean? I thought we were talking about plants. Shit that grows and people eat it. I hear farming has been around for years.
So "key safety data" is either:
A) Bullshit made up to keep prices artificially high OR
B) It's real, and we should all be worried about just how genetically altered the plants are.