"They cannot lobby if no-one actually pays them for goods."
That's my choice.
You cannot be sued simply because you've stopped purchasing a certain product. I will not purchase a DVD with a movie or TV series (and I've purchased a TON in my day) again. Done. Over.
How can that be a reason to garnish my wages? Besides, taxes have already done that... Now they'll want to rob me for NOT buying??? Where does the infringement on civil rights end?
Love that plan, eeijt. Will do what I can. ;)
"Writing to congress is not working because...your not doing it...you can't claim how something does not work when your effectively proving this by NOT doing it."
Um...they do not listen and they do not give on damn about anything a peon has to say. Some staffer reads your letter and if it gets acknowledged at all, it's with some stupid form letter some hack wrote up to make it look like your Rep. actually got your letter/email. Learn it, live it love it.
And get out and vote the bastards out of office.
What a headache-inducing load of crappy crap crap. *rolleyes*
I just learned about "Happy Birthday" being "protected" from my niece a few weeks ago - she teaches autistic children. They had a BD party for one of the children at a restaurant and were told they couldn't sing "THAT" song lest they be guilty of "copyright infringement".
So make sure all the windows are closed and you sing Happy Birthday very, VERY softly at any family birthday gatherings lest "THEY" hear you ... and be sure that camcorder is off so no one can share your family singing "Happy Birthday" on the everyone-is-a-felon-Inet.
Stop the world. I want to get off.
Okay, let me see if I have this right ... I'm at home, alone and bored. Friend from Germany sends me e-mail with a LINK to a site and says, "hey so-and-so has a RS download to a great movie - check it out."
So I do. I DL the movie, watch it, enjoy myself for 90 minutes and delete it.
Now I'm a criminal - and my friend from Germany is, too? And can be extradited? Give me a break! Someone said this is insanity - wholeheartedly agree!
Firstly, who did either of us hurt? Who's public safety was at risk? Who lost anything more than if that friend were my next door neighbor and brought the DVD over to share with me?
Seems to me "justice" is served when REAL criminals - you know, killers, drug lords, terrorists etc. are the one's pursued, not people sitting in their homes harming no one and certainly not a harmless hyperlink.
This whole thing is way out there in crazyville. It is starting to look like the Internet and all these ridiculous power grabs by wanna-be New World Order morons are the rumblings of WWIII - I mean shoot, never mind global terrorists who want to kill - GET THOSE VIRTUAL PIRATES!
God have mercy...
Did you ever hear the expression, "Silence is king"?. My older, very wise brother taught me the value of understanding just what those 3 simple words put together mean and how to differentiate when - or when not - to apply them.
Intelligent people can see that - can you?
Niall, sorry you found my comment disrespectful; however, I disagree. It's the way I feel. It is what I believe - I am not one to waver from my belief's because someone doesn't like them, sorry.
I have taken such horrendous hits for my faith that I guess my skin has just gotten very "thick" - it doesn't phase me one bit. My savior took far worse, after all ...
Well exactly. And no one is "forced" to follow any link.
Or perhaps he's smart enough to realize when "Silence is King".
"Artists likely enjoy people using their material, but if something hits, why shouldn't some of the value that they added come back to them?"
It more than likely would. With viral - totally free - marketing.
The only thing I can see being important here is that the author of work #2 make mention of the source of his inspiration, work #1. Which would lead to the free publicity for author of work #1.
Oh boy - kind of has a "creepy" factor to it. Would make me feel untrusted and spied on. But each to their own.
I had a car stolen in the late 70's. LEO found it by the end of the day. In other words, they did their job instead of letting a GPS tracker do it all for them.
Yes, that's pretty extreme.
I'm torn on this one, human nature being what it is and all... I mean, what he did was pretty good overall and one could kind of say it was "self defense" of a sort, but wouldn't it have been far better to ignore the fake profile and not engage in such hideous game playing? Look at the example he's set (especially for young people/kids). Now tons of people are going to try to play this kind of game on others. Let the games begin...
In other words, what can of worms did he open up? It may not all be "good".
On the other hand, if it would make silly women who play these silly games think twice it could serve a good purpose. Somehow though, I can't see it working that way.
It's truly amazing how food and science go together.
For a while I found myself fascinated with the concept of solar cooking and aimed to try something so I tried "Solar Smores". It worked! But being in WI the days we can do this are numbered, unfortunately. Here's the "recipe" if anyone wants to try it - it's fun! I put it in my weekly newsletter and got a lot of positive feedback.
Solar S'mores
Four graham crackers
16 mini marshmallows
2 plain chocolate candy bars
A 9 x 13-inch glass baking dish (or similar size)
A clear glass lid to cover the baking dish
Place four graham crackers side by side in the bottom of the glass baking dish. Place a chocolate bar on two of the graham crackers. Place eight mini-marshmallows on top of the other two graham crackers. Cover the pan with the clear glass lid, and place it outside where it will be in direct sunlight. Wait for the marshmallows and chocolate to melt. Put one chocolate and one marshmallow cracker together and enjoy! This activity works best when outdoor temperature is 85 degrees Fahrenheit or higher. Recipe makes two S'mores.
I don't "hate" it by any means but don't have much respect for it or give it much credibility ever since they allowed a 14 year old kid to post a bunch of tripe that was so far from the truth it wasn't funny. This occurred several years ago.
Many of us involved in the matter contacted them for corrections, showed them where to find the accurate information, yet the BS still stands. So I just pass it by.
As for all those reference links...they'd better hope none link to any "infringing content" or they're going to get bitch slapped with a heap of lawsuits of "ProtectIP" goes through. This new hire will have his work cut out for him.
"Once you know, you Newegg!"
Lol...I like it. Well, they just got yet another customer. Thanks for the suggestions.
Yes, sorry for typo; my bad.
"I guess you are just not cut out to be an RIAA lobbyist then. Congratulations!"
Thank you very much. :) Glad it shows!
Mmmm. Love muffins - how about cinnamon-mini-chocolate chip? Want one? I'll even share with a moron like you because I'm just that way.
As to whether or not the discussion may include "me", when an admin of this web site tells me a discussion is "not for me" and/or requests I not take part, I will refrain from posting.
So, is your name Mike Masnick? All I see there is an Anonymous Coward, which he is not.
Until then I will continue to treat it as an invitation to the general public - which yes, includes me - and I suggest you consider being the one to STFU if you cannot add anything constructive.
Re: Americans have 'no right' to fight crime beyond their borders when the crime was commited within your borders ?
darryl, can you grasp the fact that the Internet is not U.S. soil, nor does the U.S. "own" it any more than any other country?
Can you also "grasp" the fact that every time you indulge in your annoying and incessant habit of trying to slam Mr. Masnick you just prove - yet again - how petty and ridiculous your comments are? You sound like a jealous shrew.
Dang. I have GOT to learn to look at the name of a commenter BEFORE reading the whole post...