Yeah, we're assuming the next step after identifying a possible mass shooter would be to take his guns away. That's a poor assumption with the gun cartel in power. We'd probably just end up watching as the timebomb blows.
The entire structure of setting up a $31 million pool, such that if the people impacted actually claim their money they get less of it, is just mindbogglingly pointless.
Which has pretty much been my opinion of class action suits for a while now. They exist to penalize a wrongful party, but not to offer remuneration to those who were wronged.
Reminds me a lot of search engines driving readers to news sources.
"How DARE you send users to our content where we, ostensibly, make money from advertising!"
Uh, sorry guys. I figured you'd enjoy the eyeballs on screen soaking up your freely distributed ads.
"Well, that's not so bad. But we'd also like them (or you) to pay for the privilege."
And Jonas Salk would never have created the Polio vaccine...
Reminds me of a comment I wrote (omg) seven years ago about how all copy restrictions were in response to new technology reducing the power of entrenched interests. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120824/12382120149/authors-guild-continues-to-battle-present-attacks-another-legal-service-as-infringing.shtml#c760
You created this... "argument". What was your incentive? The right to keep other people from using that combination of words ever again?
Oh, and in true form, "The Song" was actually just a ripoff of "The Ultimate Song" but they used IP to scour the actual source material from the face of the Earth.
Oh, see I was confused. I thought there was only one song because someone wrote a song, copyrighted it, and now making any other songs would be copyright infringement. That seems more plausible than no one writing songs because there's no way to get paid without preventing someone else from looking/touching/using your stuff.
Condone: to regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless
Sure as shit sounds like they're condoning this illegal behavior by law enforcement.
If you want to talk about telephone companies, I'm right there with you. They're common carrier services prohibited by Title II from interfering with the content of their customers' communication. Makes sense, right? But Telecom also refers to telecommunication companies, ie ISPs who have somehow wriggled out of any oversight whatsoever, who can and absolutely have prioritized and replaced customers' content.
This suit is essentially from people so deep in vendor lock-in that they can't see a world without it. That's why I ran as fast as I could when I realized what Apple was doing.
You're confusing censorship with people not liking you again.
https://xkcd.com/1357/
"Condemned totally" yeah, except for their method and message, and the "fine people" who were there to promote both. People don't just walk around supporting confederate icons with that many tiki torches by accident.
Sure, they probably didn't know Patagonia would enter their market. They probably just registered ALL THE TRADEMARKS and then sat on them, not making use, so if some competitor decided they wanted to enter the market InBev had a weapon to deploy. That's NOT the purpose of trademark.
Seems like a Trademark that's only effective in preventing someone else from trademarking the words. As a descriptive phrase, surely you can't expect to prevent people from saying it in cases where they aren't referring to your goods and services.
Reminds me of the GTA Lohan suit where they claimed the likeness was too similar but also defamed for being different.
Please, tell me more about how we should demand companies break their encryption systems so that "only police" will be given access to our private communications, documents, bank accounts, and other private sundries.
Maybe theater owners should work with Netflix to screen high profile movies at their establishments at the same time they're available in homes. Unless they're worried that a big screen in a dark room with lots of seats doesn't add anything to the experience. You'd think that'd give them just the opportunity they want to prove that the silver screen is superior.
How is having a secret court any different than having a public court that no one is allowed to tell any one about?
Re: Re: "We blame guns..."
Access to a machine designed to kill 30 people in 30 seconds has direct effect on the efficacy of those who decide to rampage kill. Don't tell me that guns have no effect, there is a reason our current epidemic is with assault-style rifles and not speeding trucks in pedestrian thoroughfares.