maybe its just me but “Open dissent is the highest form of American patriotism,” rings extremely hollow.Then try Aaron Sorkin's prose for the same sentiment: A. J. MacInerney: The President doesn't answer to you, Lewis! Lewis Rothschild: Oh, yes he does A.J. I'm a citizen, this is my President. And in this country it is not only permissible to question our leaders it's our responsibility! Still hollow?
"The problem is that Microsoft has often hidden behind claims that it has to collect a lot of this data or the operating system won't work"Yeah, this one's even harder to swallow... So, Mr. Microsoft, you're claiming that if you try and use Windows 10 on a network without an internet connection, or (shock, horror!) airgapped, it'll just randomly fail.... is that right? Wow, way to build an OS!
Our Productivity Commission in general produces great stuff. It's independent of Government and full of economists, statisticians, researchers and the like."Pah! Experts! What do they know about anything? My faith-based bullshit shouting is way more valuable!" - Politicians
Silly question maybe but why we need TVs smarter than "display good quality image and that's it" when there are much better devices that can do everything the smartness can do with added security, comfort and reliability? I'd gladly skip $100 or more to get a stripped down TV...Yeah, not a silly question all att, but unfortunately if you want a large screen, an equivalent "dumb" TV is not +$100, it's more likely twice-or-more the price. This, though, is exactly my "smart" TV has been dumbed-down since purchase to being just a screen for rather smarter devices.
BUT, BUT... WE'D BE EARNING TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS IF IT WASN'T FOR PIRACY!! Our math proves it.* - Hollywood.*(except when it's tax season, then we lost trillions)
To pretend that the Constitutional clause on copyrights and patents means that any and all monopolies are good is ridiculous and misleading.
Yeah, but from their point of view, it's a pretty good play to go for considering the apparent attention span of the target audience. How likely is he to go looking for actual facts?
Note to the UK government:
They might simply pass laws that forbid the use of cameras that encrypt images. By declaring them illegal, governments could seize them at the border or whenever they are found. However, that's a fairly mild response. If the material on a camera seized by the authorities turns out to be encrypted, many would demand the password. If the photographer is lucky, a refusal might mean being thrown out of the country, probably without the camera. In the worst case, government thugs and criminals may try to obtain the necessary passwords the old-fashioned way -- by beating it out of the photographer.
This is not, repeat NOT, a playbook for how to handle encrypted cameras.
For example, the United States of America.You forgot to mention the UK... I think we're slightly ahead on the "Authoritarian" count at the moment, even if you managed to pip us at the post in the "put a dangerous asshat in charge" stakes.
"Nothing is going to change until there's a penalty for wilfully getting a DMCA takedown wrong"?
and Son gets to fill Trump's head with the idea that if he supports his looming merger -- money, jobs and miracles will rain from the sky
Well, money will probably rain from the sky into Softbank's pockets... and maybe Trump's too. Jobs will almost certainly rain from the sky like anything else that falls when dropped.... and it'll be a miracle if the public don't end up feeling like they've been pissed on from a great right.
Does that count?
In short, the $50 billion investment and the 50,000 jobs are largely fairy tail numbers wholly unrelated to Donald Trump doing much of anything.
By the way, that would be "tale", as in; "Tale told by an idiot", which quote is singularly appropriate given the teller of said "aren't I wonderful" tale. 'Far as I know, fairies don't come with butt-ornamentation.
I'll skip right past the impossibility of the kind of split you seem to be suggesting considering how often that particular deceased equine has been soundly beaten and go straight to:
Who gets to define "evil" and "non-evil"? The government? The media? People with a capital letter fetish? I'm guessing they'll all suck at it equally.
That is almost possible today, BMW traps alleged thief by remotely locking him in carYeah, sadly too easy with modern cars, and it's going really well so far!
Law enforcement insists their cars aren't fast enough to catch criminals and insists that all car manufacturers fit devices to blow all four wheels off the vehicle when activated by secret road-side buttons.
Road safety advocates point out the obvious danger of wheels being able to come off cars so easily and the danger of having buttons that might be found to do it.
Law enforcement scoffs at the privacy advocates, calls them all terrorists and fits the buttons anyway.
Almost instantly, most criminals start driving foreign cars that haven't had the explosive wheels fitted. Law enforcement kills several motorists in error while catching a handful of criminals. Many other motorists killed in multi-car pile-ups as other criminals find the buttons by the road and start merrily pushing them.
The public deserves to know how its money is being spent
Yeah, didn't you guys fight a war with us over that at some point? I vaguely remember, "no taxation without representation" being a thing at some point... right?
Come to the table and talk ideas or keep suffering defeatWho the hell would they talk to? Like the UK, modern US politics is based on selecting whichever faeces-throwing primate is left least odoriferous when the music stops. Any table in the middle of that is undoubtedly going to be covered in shit.
Don't you think it's worrying that the best-case scenario you can hope for is that he was lying through his teeth every time he opened his mouth?Maybe Trump will be the Tom Wheeler of the Presidency and do a complete 180 on all expectations of him?
Yeah, thought we'd aced it... but you had to go trump it, didn't you?
...and I thought with Brexit, we'd finally beaten you guys in the, "Dumbest nation on Earth", stakes. But nope, you pull one out of the bag at the last minute to stay top dog.
Jason Leopold points out CENTRA was contracted to review CIA torture documents. Or NOT review them, as appears to be the case here.
plus
Total cost to taxpayers for [redacted] not being at work? Almost $30,000.
...from the government's point of view, you'd have to consider that $30,000 to appear to be doing something it has no interest in doing anyway is good value!
Re: Re: Re: Bullfucking shit!