They need to add some text to whatever they call the next censorship bill, allowing criminal charges for bogus copyright claims.
Nicely written. So glad it went the right way this time. There's hope for the future. Now we know how powerful the internet can be right here in the USA. Just in time.
I own stock in AT&T, I wanted to own T-Mobile too. I wanted to be part of the 1%. Oh well, back to the park.
There's enough REs on here to choke a Darryl.
I love Righthaven like the sun loves skin.
If they were monitoring my Facebook and Twitter accounts for activity, then I would have been dead for years.
Some Copyright Maximalist Weasel words:
Freetards
Helping Artists
Saving 3 billion jobs
Losing 400 billion dollars in lost sales
Helping terrorism
I got this Mike. Piracy is not OK because it's impossible to stop. It's impossible to stop because the RIAA and MPAA cannot for the life of them, lower the price, make it easy to use or opt in to the 21st century.
This is only an anomaly. Don't get your hopes up.
So if they realize volume sales at a lower price works for trolling, why not music purchases? Lower the price of movies and music and the volume of sales skyrockets, piracy drops. Too easy?
More like the government removed the name from the front of the building the printing press was housed in. Do that to some restaurants in New York and see what happens.
"This acquisition will not change our commitment to run Android as an open platform. Motorola will remain a licensee of Android and Android will remain open. We will run Motorola as a separate business. Many hardware partners have contributed to Android?s success and we look forward to continuing to work with all of them to deliver outstanding user experiences."
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/supercharging-android-google-to-acquire.html
Google didn't buy the patents to only protect themselves. They are protecting the entire Android ecosystem.
How do you explain Bollywood?
Will original art still be worth more than copies?
Explosions in innovation occur when an idea is free and others can build on it.
Everything is a remix in the music world and yes the musicians should have to perform their entire life to continue to make a living.
How long does copyright last right now? Justify this.
They tell you that very few people use more than 200mb of data/month.
This number actually changes daily as people discover services and streaming that gobble bandwidth. Still they quote this number like it's static. I remember when PCs had 128k of ram, and that was "more than anyone would need".
Why is it that congress can't see this clearly? It won't be noticed by the average Joe on the street until everything is locked up, and you have to pay to breathe.
You mean the comments on this blog? Yeah, I think you do.
If a website critical of the government was being used to organize a protest, and it was taken off line by an ISP acting on the government's behalf, would that violate the constitution? The ISP is not obliged to provide the technical tools to make it easier.
If a printing press prints anti-government pamphlets, is that providing technical tools to make it easier for the protestors? The activists can still use bullhorns after all.
Later, Google is sued by the world in a class action for suggesting "Obama" in a search using "Hope and Change".
Re: Re: Countersue
Then get Wyden to stick it in the bill at about 2:00am, the night before the vote.