As long as those hundreds are the label heads of the RIAA members and their pet politicians, then I fully support this plan and would be willing to invest to help get the ball rolling! ;)
This!
I rarely agree with our resident special olympics winner, but OOTB is on point with the spying allegation, albeit with an additional dose of zealotry. I also do what I can to minimize the information that Google can collect about me, because I have no idea who they are selling it to, and what those 3rd parties are doing with it. I think it's a shame that the average computer user has no idea that a lot of this data collecting is even happening much less the extent of how personal the information actually is.
LMFAO
I can actually see you frothing at the mouth while you mash through keyboard after keyboard trying to get the post complete. AAARRRGGGHHH MASNIK!!!1!!
That's a pretty decent attempt at trolling...
7 out of 10
Misplaced sarcasm - Check
Link to something irrelevant to what the actual article is discussing - Check
Google hatred - Check
Ad Homs against the author - Check, Check, Check, and Check
Buzzword: Sycophants - Check with a bonus point for bringing it back from last years graveyard
Needs more Big Search and a little more hate against the rest of the techdirt community. Most of us unwashed heathens don't even know what a sycophant is... Also, more current buzzwords and throwing in 2 or 3 would be required to get a perfect score... Keep trying, though. You'll get there, tiger!
http://www.amazon.com/Hydrofarm-SLPSG400-Peruvian-Seabird-Pounds/dp/B002JLCFBA/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1361309519&sr=8-2&keywords=guano+fertilizer
:D
I don't think the word "obsessed" means what you think it means...
If you are asking why it's newsworthy, well that's pretty obvious to even a moron in a hurry. When a country passes draconian legislation based on lobbying and not research, and that legislation is costing millions in taxpayer's dollars, and the legislation is shown to not have the effect that it was intended for, this is newsworthy... period. French citizens should be interested in this article as it shows a complete waste of their tax dollars in addition to a curtailment of their rights at the expense of a dying industry, and the rest of the world should be interested as well before they decide to waste the tax dollars of their citizens on a similar proposal equally destined for failure.
Hopefully that clears it up for you, but if even those words were too large for you to comprehend, next time I can try explaining it with a popup book.
Correction... he's a wanna be lawyer that is supposedly still in law school but based on his post history he has almost no grasp of actual legal concepts and he seems to study at the Monty Python School of Arguing...
I was kind of thinking the same thing. Maybe we should all go to the libraries, check out his books, and then not return them and pay the fine to make sure he gets less exposure... security through obscurity!
This was the way the original copyright system worked... You filed for copyright and paid a fee if you felt the work could be successfully monetized. 14 years later, if you felt you could still monetize the content, you could pay another fee and renew the granted monopoly rights. This made sense. Hell, I wouldn't even mind if you could continually renew the copyright for as long as you felt you could monetize the work provided you have to actively renew it and pay a non-trivial fee for each renewal.
There is so much culture no longer being monetized that is locked up from the public, removing their ability to build and expand upon it, and those that would lock up this culture are granted this ability automatically and for free. This is a perversion of the original intent of copyright, wouldn't you say?
1000 x This!
As an ordinary person who is not a lawyer, the only thing that I can say with absolute certainty is that if the law allows for this punishment to be permissible, then the law is wrong and needs to be fixed. No amount of defending this verdict is ever going to make the public agree with it or respect copyright any more than they already do.
Duh... She's a "journo". Now prepare to be added to the lawsuit for libel for daring to insult her and and her work as journalism!
Please stop calling the Diamond Rio an ipod, and please never capitalize a letter directly following a lowercase "i".
Thank you, that will be all.
(PS - I agree with your analysis of the frivolity of this patent's issuance. The prior art to these claims is so ridiculously obvious the only explanation is that all USPTO examiners must be required to have been Amish hermits immediately preceding their USPTO appointments.)
lmao... check your snowflake, sweetheart ;)
Am I the only person that is beginning to think there is no real Brett Gibbs and this has all been an elaborate trolling operation by 4chan or reddit? You seriously can't make this shit up!
Better call Saul! We'll turn your addiction into a prescription!
See, he said he didn't have a problem with you insulting his music, just with insulting him directly...
You have a limp dick, Marx!
FTFY :D
And, yeah... anytime I hear his music my testicles crawl up into my stomach and won't come out if they see their shadow.
The problem with your presumption is that let's say she didn't admit to the single infringement because she didn't actually do it... She could say I didn't download those files. They could check her hard drive and see that they weren't there. She still would have been found guilty based on the explanation given by the tribunal because they basically said that accusation equals infringement. This is what we're reacting to.
I was thinking the same thing. Since 21 Million is a drop in the bucket to a national economy, and since the loses to Antigua's economy was probably an order of magnitude higher, I'm hoping they use this site as a big FU to the US and make it something ridiculous like a dollar a month, or even a year. Ensuring that the most amount of people access the most content possible before hitting the 21M limit should be their only priority.
And beyond that, the moderation is community driven and not done at the whim of administrators. My understanding is that once a comment gets enough votes it becomes funny, insightful, or reported unlike other comment sections where the moderators or authors blatantly censor what they don't want to see. We as a community at techdirt decide when something should removed and then it's still just a click away.
Seems like legal scamming mastermind Alan Cooper is up to his old tricks again... I feel bad for Brett Gibbs and poor John Steele who are clearly the victims in all of this. David Walsh is probably just another of Cooper's aliases. Perhaps Prenda can hire Tara Carreon to do a little PR and try to get their image back on track.
Shame on you Mr. Cooper!