Cannibalize your current cash cow for the future, or ride it into the ground and watch an upstart do it to you.
There aren't too many orgs with the fortitude to pull that off. I doubt ESPN will be able to. Netflix comes to mind, but hey, they freaking *named* the company with the vision they wanted, even when they were shipping physical disks in the mail.
iOS now has a reasonably easy way to disable fingerprint unlock on the fly. 5 presses of the power button, and it will reject all touchID attempts. I don't have an X, but my guess is this works for FaceID too.
Maybe he should talk to Todd Davis…
https://www.wired.com/2010/05/lifelock-identity-theft/
"Apparently, when you publish your Social Security number prominently on your website and billboards, people take it as an invitation to steal your identity.
LifeLock CEO Todd Davis, whose [social security]number is displayed in the company's ubiquitous advertisements, has by now learned that lesson. He's been a victim of identity theft at least 13 times,…"
When it comes to literally putting your money where your mouth is, I would like to see any person who is proposing a backdoor encryption model move all of their personal banking, stocks, bonds, loans, retirement accounts... really all financial data over to using that encryption. Given all the bad actors out there, do they really trust all of their money with this system? I think we all know the answer...
go to AirBnB instead?
Oh wait, you are. Shit. Come back please! We'll give you reward points (whatever those are good for) and a mint on your pillow!
It's fun to fantasize the stuff I could do with a lot of money. One awesome scenario would be to find out the company that provide internet service to the FCC, buy them, and then "free market" the heck out of their connection. Completely block all traffic to and from Verizon, AT&T and all the other big telcos unless they buy the "just desserts" package for only $999,999/month. Any maybe just randomly slow down service, accidentally misdirect emails over to The Intercept and Wikileaks, have unschedule service windows during peak business hours... What are they going to do, sue me? Ha!
Citation needed.
I know there have been some cases of shopping malls being declared public venues, but then the precedent was stepped back in later rulings. And now it seems that—while a few states have passed more expansive free speech laws on private property—the federal government has not.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2003/03/why_can_shopping_malls_limit_free_speech.html
And your point is? YouTube said that to explain to its community what happened and what they should expect in the future. The phrase "improperly censored videos" is regarding YouTube's own internal policies, and not some legal definition.
IANAL, but the fact that YouTube is not a public forum means they can curate and moderate however they see fit, right? I mean all that other stuff about section 230 is nice and all, but shouldn't it start and end with the fact that YouTube has the right to refuse service to anyone, just like restaurants?
I thought it was funny that here they are sharing a physics paper on the internet, nearly 3 decades after physicist Tim Berners-Lee specced and implemented HTML, specifically for sharing documents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML#Development
If you have a known back door, anyone who really wants to is going to get through it. So only the ill-informed or lazy would ever use it.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world—which last I checked the US still does not control—will continue to use the real thing. So the US would essentially be putting themselves at a huge disadvantage.
SMH
I had the same idea. Maybe not Steamboat Willie—which is actually a cartoon, not a book—but some other obscure book or comic book from that era that includes Mickey or any Disney character. I would absolutely contribute to a legal defense fund when the 'Mouse lawyers come out to play.
The NSA should have access to all of this email. If they cared to go dig it up. Which they probably don't because these are the same guys who can influence their programs and funding. But for the next leaker out there, maybe throw these into the archive as well before you walk out the door...
In fact, you should write one every week. Just like Bruce Schneier has his Friday squid blog post, you should have a weekly "Shiva STILL didn't invent email" post. You could crowdfund some of the writing. I'd pay $20 to get a particularly purple descriptor published:
Shiva—who even narcissists refer to as a completely delusional, self-absorbed waste of his constituent atomic elements…
If Alex has shown such blatant disregard in false DMCA takedowns, then I'd bet even odds that she'll also DMCA the new soundtrack, just because that's the kind of scorched earth tactic people like her tend to do. She'll rationalize it saying the new soundtrack was derivative of her work or some other such BS. Conatus had better be prepared to go to court.
That said, if Steam doesn't have its own system for appealing a takedown and filing evidence to reverse it, then they are equally complicit in this problem. At least with YouTube, whenever I've had claims on videos I've uploaded, I can send supporting documentation and in all cases I've had them reversed.
Says the savvy company that wants to leak their NSL to the press and have plausible deniability about violating any order.
It seems worth mentioning in all of these "you need to pay me for advertising our content on your search engine" articles that anyone may opt out of unauthorized snippets simply by configuring their robots.txt file and then doing licensing deals for people who want to pay. Of course they'd rather get all the same traffic AND some extra for free cash too and let the govt manage the deals.
I admit a company probably would never do this, but why can't Google just say, fine we won't have a business presence in the EU? They can still absolutely sell services and ads that are targeted to that local. Just require the transactions to take place on US servers using US $. and of course people will still be able to get to Google. And they will, unless governments start Draconian blocking. Google basically did this with news in Spain. I don't see why they don't just do that in this case as well.
And thus ends the music composition career of Alex Mauer, whereby no rational, background-checking entity will ever hire her to clean their floors let alone create music for them. It amazes me how people can be so shortsighted as to not see even one step beyond where things stand right now.
Once Wray is done balancing encryption concerns…
he can then tackle balancing the lascivious proclivities of pedophiles against the desire for children to not be raped.