surprised they actually realized this can hurt them as well, but very glad they did. Hopefully, if they win this will help others in their fair use claims as well.
I agree, while the concept might be derivative, using her exact art - color is not really derivative its outright copying. I agree the t-shirt is perfectly fine but the bag seems highly questionable.
Depends how DHS would see it though.
Generally things come into play at the land, otherwise the entire coastal part is wrong since international waters start about 12 miles out (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_waters)
as a result everything should only be affected 88 miles inland instead of the 100 they are showing, if this is the case.
that doesn't even get into the fact that many devices are actually left on unintentionally in bags or pockets.
Plus they make you "turn off" ereaders, but you just have to put cell phones and devices in flight mode. I'm pretty sure smartphones and most other devices put off way more EMI than an ereader which only really uses power to change pages.
what jeff said mostly applies but yet there is still no way to watch Amazon video on none Kindle Fire's.
You can get music, books, audiobooks on pretty much any device. However, if you want to watch digital video on a handheld device it currently only exists on the Fire and has for the last year. If this is truly how they feel they need to release apps for other handheld devices.
It can't just be licensing holding them back I can watch amazon on several other devices (Sony TV, Sony Bluray Player, Xbox 360) but no iDevices or Androids that aren't put out by amazon.
Not true, that's the cost to duplicate it. It costs amazon x.xx per copy to the publisher plus "about 0" to themselves for storage/bandwidth. So as long as they are charging x.xx + 0/y they are making marginal cost
Brilliant idea, instead of a jury of people since people aren't the peers of Samsung or Apple.
The jury can be made up of other corporations.
We'll have a jury made up of 12 corporations in the technology field.
IBM
Microsoft
Redhat
Motorolla
Nokia
Sony
HP
Dell
Logitech
Oracle
Facebook
Intel
except they are talking about trying to sell this to people in the future to replace their home DSL/Cable broadband. 10 gigs at home is nothing I go through that in a couple days
I agree but perhaps the deal they had to sign to get it distributed in theaters required the delay, since we all know that theaters think that the delay helps them and are afraid of anything else.
it's a daily news show who cares about old content, they still have clips up which would be about all i care about and they still have episodes on hulu, so still a non-issue
This isn't happening in the US. the US is trying to get New Zealand to do whatever it is the US wants. Hence government refers to the US government arguing against Megaupload being able to do anything in New Zealand court.
another example:
many, many, many android roms and their supporting files were hosted on megaupload. If you were a user of the xda forums you've probably downloaded something from megaupload.
Myself and many many others would get the latest roms and tools from megaupload, and it was great as the developers didn't have to pay for all the bandwidth to host these great community tools.
What public interest is served in arresting someone who tweeted public factual information?
If they want to maybe go after whoever originally started it, I can understand that. Perhaps that is what they are planning, but it sounds more like they want to try getting anyone they can identify who tweeted this information.
Arresting people who repeated information accomplishes nothing and the information will still be public.
Re:
They can't ask your age on an application. Which is the only part of this that makes some sense. But she created the mess that she is in.
Re: Could We Quote Them?
surprised they actually realized this can hurt them as well, but very glad they did. Hopefully, if they win this will help others in their fair use claims as well.
Re: Response
I agree, while the concept might be derivative, using her exact art - color is not really derivative its outright copying. I agree the t-shirt is perfectly fine but the bag seems highly questionable.
Re: Remember google notebook
Yep, don't even care what Keep is or does. Google will just shut it down soon.
Wave, Notebook, iGoogle, Reader, and many more
Re:
Depends how DHS would see it though.
Generally things come into play at the land, otherwise the entire coastal part is wrong since international waters start about 12 miles out (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_waters)
as a result everything should only be affected 88 miles inland instead of the 100 they are showing, if this is the case.
Re:
that doesn't even get into the fact that many devices are actually left on unintentionally in bags or pockets.
Plus they make you "turn off" ereaders, but you just have to put cell phones and devices in flight mode. I'm pretty sure smartphones and most other devices put off way more EMI than an ereader which only really uses power to change pages.
mostly true except on all their video conent
what jeff said mostly applies but yet there is still no way to watch Amazon video on none Kindle Fire's.
You can get music, books, audiobooks on pretty much any device. However, if you want to watch digital video on a handheld device it currently only exists on the Fire and has for the last year. If this is truly how they feel they need to release apps for other handheld devices.
It can't just be licensing holding them back I can watch amazon on several other devices (Sony TV, Sony Bluray Player, Xbox 360) but no iDevices or Androids that aren't put out by amazon.
Re: Re:
Not true, that's the cost to duplicate it. It costs amazon x.xx per copy to the publisher plus "about 0" to themselves for storage/bandwidth. So as long as they are charging x.xx + 0/y they are making marginal cost
Re: Re:
as pointed out above it also works fine on an xbox360
Re: Re: Re: Re: Jury Nullification in action
except as has been pointed out multiple times it is used in favor of a defendant, not in favor of a claimant against a defendant as is the case here.
Re: Re: Re:
Brilliant idea, instead of a jury of people since people aren't the peers of Samsung or Apple.
The jury can be made up of other corporations.
We'll have a jury made up of 12 corporations in the technology field.
IBM
Microsoft
Redhat
Motorolla
Nokia
Sony
HP
Dell
Logitech
Oracle
Facebook
Intel
Re: Re:
except they are talking about trying to sell this to people in the future to replace their home DSL/Cable broadband. 10 gigs at home is nothing I go through that in a couple days
Re:
I agree but perhaps the deal they had to sign to get it distributed in theaters required the delay, since we all know that theaters think that the delay helps them and are afraid of anything else.
Re: Re: Re:
it's a daily news show who cares about old content, they still have clips up which would be about all i care about and they still have episodes on hulu, so still a non-issue
Re: Re: I love DirecTV's counter-move.
i think someone missed the sarcasm
Re:
this seems as a mostly meaningless pull at the moment, as both shows are currently on a break and no new episodes are currently being created.
We'll see what actually happens when these guys get back from vacation.
Re:
This isn't happening in the US. the US is trying to get New Zealand to do whatever it is the US wants. Hence government refers to the US government arguing against Megaupload being able to do anything in New Zealand court.
Re:
another example:
many, many, many android roms and their supporting files were hosted on megaupload. If you were a user of the xda forums you've probably downloaded something from megaupload.
Myself and many many others would get the latest roms and tools from megaupload, and it was great as the developers didn't have to pay for all the bandwidth to host these great community tools.
Re: Privacy does not need to be defined by victim status.
What public interest is served in arresting someone who tweeted public factual information?
If they want to maybe go after whoever originally started it, I can understand that. Perhaps that is what they are planning, but it sounds more like they want to try getting anyone they can identify who tweeted this information.
Arresting people who repeated information accomplishes nothing and the information will still be public.
Re: Re: ...
Agreed, although in actually the pope is only infallible when speaking Ex Cathedra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility#Ex_cathedra)