John Fenderson's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the all-hail-eris dept
I've been hanging around Techdirt for a few years now, so hello to my old friends as well as new. One of the things I like the best about this place is that Techdirt is only a technology blog when looked at with one eye. It really covers the intersection of technology and culture. You may or may not know this about me, but I am a Discordian. We are in particularly chaotic times right now. Old systems and businesses are fighting to their death while new ones are discovering the world to be more complex than they supposed. All anyone can say with real confidence is that tomorrow will not look much like yesterday.
With chaos comes opportunity, however. It is during these times, when change is guaranteed but the nature of it is not, that we have a rare chance of shaping the nature of it. Big money corporate forces and a systemically corrupt government are consciously aware of this and are actively working at a fever pitch to shape it in their best interest. What they don't want you to know is that chaos is a great equalizer. Great power requires order to maintain it, but individuals do not. In times like this the playing field is closer to being level. It becomes possible for you, or I, to individually change things for the better. Collectively, we can change everything.
Let's look back at the last week and see what chaos had brought us.
Computers That Accurately Guess What Gangs Did What Crimes
I can tell you one of the most frequent things people misunderstand about chaos. Chaos is not randomness, or a kind of randomness. Chaos is actually order -- apparently disorganized order, but order nonetheless. Chaotic systems are those which are extremely sensitive to initial events. But chaotic systems are not necessarily unpredictable systems.
We, The People, Are Sarcastic And Not Easily Mollified By Bland Political Non-Answers
Not unpredictable at all.
Why PROTECT IP/SOPA Is The Exact Wrong Approach To Dealing With Infringement Online
That is, unless you are one of the greyfaces whose fear of change has caused blindness preventing the ability to see solutions that may be different than the old comfortable ones, but actually have a chance of working.
Lessons Learned From 'Pay What You Want'
Even when the solution might be counter to everything that you think is true.
A History Of Hyperbolic Overreaction To Copyright Issues: The Entertainment Industry And Technology
Even when an industry's entire history is riddled with examples of the same blindness.
Free As In Freedom: But Whose Freedom?
Richard Stallman, love him or hate him, has the admirable quality of being unafraid to give his unvarnished opinion on matters that interest him. Some might suspect him of insanity, communism, hippiness, or dementia, but they're all wrong. What he is is a firebrand, and like all firebrands he will invariably say something irritating or offensive to some people. Firebrands are an essential part of society. We need them to shake us out of our mental ruts and shock us into actively thinking out our positions, whether those positions agree with them or not. It's OK that he confuses fraud with copyright violation. Lots of people do.
Canadian Actor Claims Mashups Are Morally Wrong And Should Be Illegal
Leah Pinset gives us an interesting example of the process of forming chaos to shape reality. The reality she experiences and wants to make us all live in is one where she can declare certain types of music immoral because she doesn't like it much.
She's got lots of company. Here, we have RIAA doing the very same thing, but opposite:
RIAA Explains Its Interpretation Of SOPA; Which Doesn't Seem To Be Found In The Bill Itself
In this case, RIAA wants legislation that would do great harm to every aspect of society. No, I'm not talking about SOPA -- SOPA isn't what they want, it's what they're currently willing to compromise to. They know that what they actually want is a political nonstarter. It would be rejected handily by almost everybody. So they give us SOPA, which is exactly as egregious as they thought was politically possible. That looks less possible now, so they are taking the tack that the Justice Department wanted the ability to do: they are lying.
Justice Department Drops Its Request To Be Allowed To Lie In Response To FOIA Requests
Oh, here's the lying! The Justice department wanted to be able to legally lie to us about the mere existence of records that we citizens collectively own. They've changed their minds and are ok with having to lie about lying like they used to.
DOJ: Secret Interpretation Of PATRIOT Act Just Like Grand Jury Subpoena If You Ignore 'Factual Context'
It's not all untruthfulness, though. It's easier to avoid lying if you can just avoid talking about it. That "it" is the laws that you and I are supposed to be subject to, and therefore presumably should know about, is irrelevant.
Understanding Anonymous: The Culture Of Lulz
There's a law of nature recognized within Discordianism. It is simply this: nature seeks a balance between order and discord. When one grows too strong, the pendulum will always shift. For example, increased social disorder gives rise to grand displays of order through more oppressive laws and policing. And the other way around.
Building Company Realizes That Threatening A Blogger With Bogus Libel Suit Was A Bad Idea; Sincerely Apologizes
In small ways as well as big.
Despite Publisher Apprehension, Good Old Games Proves A Market For Old DRM-Free Games Exists
You can't compete with free? The hundreds I've spent at Good Old Games argue otherwise.
Barnes & Noble Claims That Microsoft Patent Shakedown Over Android Is An Antitrust Violation
I've done my share of software engineering contract work for large companies in the past, and one of the things I've learned is that being the outsider is a powerful position. The outsider can often speak truths that cannot be spoken by people who are invested in the company. The outsider can take radical action with less fear due to simple ignorance of the minefield they're walking through. Barnes & Noble is an outsider in this space and, as such, can take action that is simply impossible for the established players. I never thought I'd see Barnes & Noble as a force for positive change in my industry, but I'm not too surprised, really. It had to be someone I wouldn't have expected.
Really, unless you are in the 1% or are a large corporation, you are an outsider in the political world right now. Which means you have a chance to shape the future. You have more power now than you have likely had in your lifetime. Seize it, and make the future a good one.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @"PaulT", compulsive yapper.
Why can't you say anything without being an ass?
I wasn't talking off the cuff, I was using US Census figures: the median individual income in the US last census was around $44,000/year. You are using figures specific to commercial writing (which I think is a bit misleading, but that's a different discussion), I was using exactly what I said: median income.
Your expectation for an experienced writer was $76,800/yr. That's pretty close to twice the median. Even if we accept your BLS statistics, you're still inflating the value considerably.
Re: Point of curiosity...
I have never seen an unwanted popup from anybody, not even Netflix, since I started using NoScript.
Mark Twain opened my eyes about this
I had a copy of "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" that had a rather lengthy introduction written by Twain. It consisted in large part of a diatribe against the youth of his day.
I've never forgotten it because every single thing he said was precisely what people say now, right down to "it wasn't like this when I was young" and "society is doomed".
Later, I learned that it has always been so: every generation thinks both that they invented sex and that society is about to collapse.
Re: To be fair...
Good point, but still. The immorality of the health care situation is staggering.
To your point, I recently learned that my own income is in the top 10% of the income range in the US. This struck me as deeply disturbing because I'm not anything like wealthy. I'm not poor, but I don't get to snort coke off of the asses of strippers or anything, either.
Re: Re: fixing the issue
How about collapsing the entire thread except for comments flagged as Insightful or Funny? Or adding an option in that filter pulldown to collapse the flagged threads?
Sometimes, I enjoy reading the troll's posts. Sometimes, I just want to hear the sane people talking.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @"PaulT", compulsive yapper.
So, you think that writers here should make more than twice the average income in the US? You aren't even on the same continent as reasonableness.
Re: Re: Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!
I don't think even that would be all that hard. When a friend of mine was studying to be a cop, he mentioned something about this: that every car on the road has something citable about it. One of the exercises they engaged in was to find three citable violations in a randomly selected vehicle.
Re:
No, it doesn't. It just means that they'll do three times as much surveillance.
As with the other spying issues, the point isn't that you, or I, in particular are being surveilled. It's that massive surveillance has a large number of detrimental effects to society as a whole, and that the cops & spy outfits have repeatedly demonstrated, over a period of many decades, that they will inevitably use their new power to do things like suppress legitimate dissent, punish political enemies, etc.
This is a stunning statement. So now we have to refrain from legal activity in the privacy of our own land just so cops get to play with their new toys?
I don't bitch about everything the government does. I bitch about the things I see the government doing wrong. This is not only my right, but it is my responsibility as a citizen.
For the record, I don't think the drones issue is nearly as big of a deal as the telephone spying, but there's no reason not to call out both of these as issues that need to be addressed.
Re: Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.
Indeed. Speaking as a person who is highly critical of Google and encourages people to be wary of them, Blue's attempts are counterproductive in the extreme. He comes off as a lunatic, and so allows people to write off folks who point out the real trade-offs Google presents as just one of the lunatic crowd.
If Blue really wanted to raise awareness about Googly issues, he'd be well advised to talk like a rational person. Or, if that's impossible, to at least shut up and let others do the job.
Re: Re:
What a jackass response.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.
I have seen no proof. I believe it is a hunch based on writing styles and themes, which are similar. In my view, that's not solid enough evidence to say they're the same person. Also, it doesn't matter in the slightest if they are.
Re: It's not all about "working", but about STATING MORALITY.
No, it's not. Law is to set out the rules of a society that subject you to state punishment. There's nothing about them that is intended to be educational. Also, law is not intended to specify what is moral or not. Law is amoral.
What you're talking about is mores, those societal rules that are just as potent as law but covers matters of morality rather than matters of law.
Re:
I think the point is that the defense needed to have access to that data as well. If they do not, then they are being unfairly hampered in their defense.
Re:
This has been my position from when the FISC was first created. The court is a travesty.
Re: Wow. This is bad on so many levels.
100% this. No US-based service is trustworthy, as a matter of law.
Re:
With the capturing of phone data, the one specific detail that we do have is more than enough to warrant great outcry: they're compiling a database of data about all of our communications. Further revelations may indicate that the outcry be increased, but they cannot possible indicate that the outcry so far was too much.
The capturing of internet traffic data is less clear-cut, but the details we have right now are certainly enough to warrant expressions of concern.
Re: Re: First amendment
Because SOPA was government action.
Re: That's nice, but WE live in terminally predatory capitalism.
Not by a longshot. In fact, I would assert the exact opposite: this sort of thing is more true now than ever before in my lifetime.
The revolution continues apace. That's why you see so much fighting.
Re: Re:
Unless you're poor. Then it really is that bad. And if you aren't poor, but aren't rich either, then a single major medical problem will bankrupt you (even if you have insurance).
This is an unconscionable situation in the richest nation in the world.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a joke
Don't most people disable cookies by default? They should.