You're a Gazelle! (profile), Apr 30th, 2013 @ 5:27pm
That's why he lost
The attack ads worked on Dion and Ignatieff in the past because they couldn't figure out how to handle it. Trudeau's a different story. This strategy, along with the taxpayer paid Economic Action Plan TV ads telling us how great the government is and paid partisan constituent handouts saying how crappy the opposition is are really starting to peeve us Canucks.
Dion should just stay in the background on this one and let it play out 'cause it's building up to backfire on it's own.
Besides, nobody wants to look at that stuff during the Stanley Cup playoffs!
You're a Gazelle! (profile), Aug 21st, 2012 @ 11:28am
Re: Incorrect
So, people can just claim publicity rights when someone like a documentary filmmaker or a reporter says something they don't like about them. That's a great way out!
We had better get all those unauthorized biographies off the shelves too!
You're a Gazelle! (profile), Aug 16th, 2012 @ 1:45pm
Re: Re:
It seems to me the designs are just made based on good human factors. Rounded corners don't hurt. I've seen lots of counter-tops with this design as well and never hear about litigation. Maybe Samsung should try rounded rectangles with knives sticking out?
You're a Gazelle! (profile), Jun 28th, 2012 @ 7:21am
Re:
I agree! They should arrest all those moms, dads, brothers, daughters and friends out there braiding each other's hair without a license! How shameful!
Dog On a Teflon Floor (profile), Jun 5th, 2012 @ 6:36am
Reasoning?
According to the boards reasoning #1 is:
"The use of recorded music is popular at
sporting events, concert performances, festivals
and fairs, parades, circuses and many other types
of public entertainment. Authors of this music
have been paid royalties for decades; performers
and makers of sound recordings have yet to
receive any compensation in this respect".
All I can say is huh? Don't DJ's, etc already pay for the recordings? How could they possibly not receive any compensation?
If they don't, they probably should look at the collection societies for some dysfunction or at least talk to someone who understands business..
Dog On a Teflon Floor (profile), Jun 1st, 2012 @ 2:32pm
Re:
This is a relatively new adaptation to the internet reality. Someone has to try it first. Kind of like the first 2 people who signed on with record labels during the birth of the recording industry.
Dog On a Teflon Floor (profile), May 2nd, 2012 @ 11:33am
Re:
Yo AC Bot 3000! Try to stay on topic at least. This article is about modding and not piracy. BTW, Mike didn't even write it. Regardless of the author, the point of view expressed in the article is not obfuscated at all. You really look both illiterate and foolish.
Dog On a Teflon Floor (profile), Mar 23rd, 2012 @ 6:57am
Re: Get Your Priorities Straight
It may be hard to understand but some countries do put their people and their health above the profit motive, even see it as a basic right. The Indian industry and humanity in general are enriched by sharing advances in science. That's how it works.
On the post: Canadian Politician Uses Nutty Hybrid Copyright Complaint In Attempt To Stifle Criticism
That's why he lost
Dion should just stay in the background on this one and let it play out 'cause it's building up to backfire on it's own.
Besides, nobody wants to look at that stuff during the Stanley Cup playoffs!
On the post: Cisco, Motorola, Netgear Team Up To Expose Wifi Patent Bully
Oligarchy?
/sarc
On the post: DRAM Patent Holder Rambus Called Out (Again) For Shredding Evidence
Re: Annual Shred Days
On the post: Twitter Sued For Failing To Take Down Images Following DMCA Notices
Re:
/sarc
Good enough?
On the post: Wilt Chamberlain's Family Tries To Block Film About His College Years, Claiming 'Publicity Rights'
Re: Incorrect
We had better get all those unauthorized biographies off the shelves too!
On the post: Band Calls 1st Amendment A 'Buzzword' In (Plagiarized) C&D To Mitt Romney Over (Licensed) Use Of Song
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/17/rage-against-the-machine-isnt-returning-ryans-l ove/
On the post: Judge Suggests Apple Is 'Smoking Crack' With Its Witness List In Samsung Dispute
Re: Re:
On the post: New French Government Not Impressed By Hadopi; Wants To Cut Its Funding
Re:
On the post: Countries That Don't Put In Place Copyright Regimes The US Likes May Be Deemed 'Cybersecurity Concerns'
Re: Re:
On the post: Why You Can't Braid Someone's Hair In Utah For Money Without First Paying $16k
Re:
On the post: Canada Approves New Music Tariffs; Weddings Cost Double If You Dance
Reasoning?
"The use of recorded music is popular at
sporting events, concert performances, festivals
and fairs, parades, circuses and many other types
of public entertainment. Authors of this music
have been paid royalties for decades; performers
and makers of sound recordings have yet to
receive any compensation in this respect".
All I can say is huh? Don't DJ's, etc already pay for the recordings? How could they possibly not receive any compensation?
If they don't, they probably should look at the collection societies for some dysfunction or at least talk to someone who understands business..
On the post: Amanda Palmer Raises $1.2 Million On Kickstarter, And The Crowd Goes Wild
Re:
On the post: Dear Ari Emanuel: We're All Meeting On The Internet, Come Join Us
Re:
On the post: Megaupload Filings Show Massive Flaws In US Case, Ask Court To Dismiss
Re:
On the post: As Usual, Media Outlets Mindlessly Parrot BSA Press Releases With Zero Scrutiny
On the post: Blog Fight Devolves Into Legal Nastygrams
On the post: After Four Years Feds Finally Get Around To Prosecuting Ten Mod Chip Sellers
Re:
On the post: Another Boost For Generics: Brazilian Judge Annuls Patent On Key AIDS Drug
Re: Get Your Priorities Straight
On the post: US Government 'Suspends' JotForm.com Over User Generated Forms; Censorship Regime Expands
Re: Re: Re:
Obvious troll is obviously immune to logic. No more point in debating if that is the case.
On the post: How Much Of The Collapse Of Recorded Music Sales Revenue Was Due To The End Of Illegal Price Fixing?
Re: