as more outs and more appeal levels than almost any court system on the planet
Interestingly the court systems where There are better and more appeal levels and work more with procedural fairness (what the US Systems DOES NOT HAVE) are the New Zealand and Australian ones... Based off the English system... Canada isn't far behind those two either.. the UK sadly has become more US like in its judicial processes.
Kim would NEVER have a fair trial in the US court systems, and the notion of a fair trial nowadays with anything to do with high profile criminal or civil cases in the US is ONLY when it suits the USG's purposes. Your (the US's) societal system is crumbling already, you're just too blinkered and close to understand what you have lost over the last 30yrs
Correct, his guilt has already retrospectively been decided beforehand by your Grand Jury (called a Star Chamber everywhere else). The extradition is just to allow the GJ process to get to do what it does best, convict everyone and their ham sandwich based on third party unreliable unauthentic hearsay and rhetoric
I'll let you into a few secrets.. I'm a licensed 747-300/400 Avionics Engineer (from way back in early 90's) and you are ABSOLUTELY UNEQUIVICALLY WRONG!
All electronics in aircraft are shielded, there have been none, zilch, nada, Zero cases of ANY consumer electronic devices causing ANY problems whatsoever with any aircraft sub systems or external systems like TACAN, etc anywhere on the planet in the history of air travel.
There is already a quasi Faraday cage around every single commercial aircraft anyway.. it's caused by the friction of going through the air at speed above 150mph giving off a static charge. There are even subsystems on the aircraft to compensate for this problematic static charge and faraday effect.
Whether the instruments are in the cockpit (in commercial airliners the cockpit holds the least amount of computers.. in fact most computers etc in 747's etc are normally in a hold above the front wheel truck) is irrelevant to any interference from devices that barely come close to matching background radiation (sunspots cause more problems than anything else ever).
Well that's easy... Play BF3 as an Engineer (like I do 80% of the time) equip Stingers and then Point your nice kill rocket at the nearest Bell Helicopter (Scout Heli) unless the pilot has ECM or Flares equipped they are disabled in 1 hit and destroyed in 2 (or less sometimes if they crash).
Basically means Bell Heli's now in BF3 are flying coffins, ie: CRAP!!!!!! though the Attack heli's now aren't much better..
Disclaimer: I love blowing up heli's.. though I normally use RPG/SMAW's to do so. Muwahahahaha
It's not whether it is meritorious or not. A federal judge has ordered that all other courts and matters that the attorneys who have been found lacking in candour, ethics, and other violations of their duty to the Court (be that court Federal or otherwise - it is irrelevant) are involved with be INFORMED of the above findings and should therefore take these into consideration when applying Rules and other Bench procedures to them for any matters that would sometimes be let slid.
Also it is necessary for other Courts to know that there are Bar proceedings against same Attorneys since it is highly likely based on previous history that the Attorneys at question would not have the candour to explain same to the courts as they are meant to do.
As soon as I read that I couldn't help but think of that line from Pink Floyd's The Wall (Part II) "If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don't eat ya meat"
Though it makes sense when you think about it.. Blue is basically Comfortably Numb (or is that dumb???)
Re: Superior sense: if you like HHGTG, DON'T WATCH THE MOVIE!
Now we might all understand OOTB's major reason..
He's actually Marvin without the brain the size of a planet (walnut maybe) who's imbibed too many Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters and who has never listened to the original radio series nor seen the original BBC TV series.
Exif or IPTC data is ONLY metadata and is not meant to be used for providence and/or ownership purposes and only for searching/tagging that's why it's able to be easily (and quite the norm actually) stripped from items.
If these photographers (and anyone creating Digital products) want to control their works then they need to actually use the tools and standards that have been created to do this.
This is where Digital Watermarks that are highly verifiable and authentic, like those from Digimarc, MarkAny or DataMark for example if you are doing a fair few projects per year for commercial purposes are supposed to be used.
These are for Photographers, AV Producers, ebooks, etc.. and though cost to actually use them thats the cost of doing business. If you want your product to have providence and authenticity then PAY FOR THEM! If you just want your product tagged with unverifiable and highly unreliable data then by all means use the free meta-data tools that are NOT meant for that purpose.
For more info about Digital Watermarks go look on the Alliance page who have a great selection of information of what DW's can and should be used for as well as a wide variety of companies that provide commercial DW services
or at worst, get a slap on the wrist via a DMCA takedown
So your now stating that the DMCA is a punitive measure? hmmm that's interesting would you like to further place your foot in your mouth or would you rather just let that statement slide until it's taken out and cited when you claim that the DMCA "does nothing for rights holders and is topthless, and should be a punishment device backed by law instead" or words to that effect??? ... your move
Which rights are you talking about...
Please consider carefully especially when you realise and understand that copyright or any Intellectual property is NOT a right at all instead it is a LIMITED PRIVILEGE ONLY!
Whereas the ability to COPY is a fundamental right that is constrained by statute, and therefore not inherent, by the limited privilege of copyright
So I ask you again... WHAT RIGHTS ARE YOU BLABBERING ON ABOUT?
Re: Re: Ankle-biters at Gawker have gotten outside the fence!
We defend the offensive, the vile, the vulgar, and the disturbing because we must.
This a thousand times this...
The interesting thing is that OOTB is itself protected by this otherwise I finding him/it vulgar, vile, disturbing and offensive to my intelligent would be able to shut him up with legal shenanigans too.. Damnation!!! ;)