The problem is that public safety exceptions apply to emergencies, but not trials. Applying that exception to find out if a terrorist planted additional bombs is exactly how it should be used...
Except that while anything you learn that way can be used to save lives, in the public interest, such confessions are INADMISSIBLE in court. If you have enough physical evidence to not need a confession, great. If your case comes down to needing that confession or the accused walks away a free man...then the exception means he walks.
Re: SO no US address = immune from all prosecution?
So what you're saying is, that if a U.S. corporation that exists solely within the U.S., only does business within the U.S. and has no offices, personnel or facilities outside the U.S., that should not shield them from being extradited for prosecution in an EU court for violating French law?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So Masnick has taken a postion on copyright?
Intellectual property is not a natural right. When was the last time you saw one wolf prohibiting other wolves from using his style of stalking? Or a bee stinging another bee to death for doing the same dance moves?
The only natural rights are the right to take whatever you're strong enough to take and the right to fight to the death to defend what's yours.
Every other "right" is a creation of the sorts of agreements you called kangarooski a caveman over and are as artificial as the tax code.
If a camera phone is being used as a camera, the only place you could put the barrel would be aimed straight up in the air or off to the side. Even a .22 short cartridge is longer than modern phones are thick.
I seem to recall reading about a study a few years back that found that gamers as a demographic group have drastically reduced rates of violent crime when compared to the general population.
Anybody got a copy they could forward to the NJ legislature?
If I were to leave a rack of rated-M games in the legislator's offices labeled "free samples", would she be liable for a $10,000 fine under her own law?
Well, they can in one specific case. If the role would require on-camera acts that would be illegal to film a minor performing, then they can ask about age and make providing proof of age a condition of employment.
On the post: Judge Calls Out Obama Admin For Overuse Of State Secrets Privilege In No-Fly Case
Re: Re:
On the post: Judge Calls Out Obama Admin For Overuse Of State Secrets Privilege In No-Fly Case
Re: Classified Correspondence?
On the post: Why The DOJ's Decision To Not Read Dzhokhar Tsarnaev His Miranda Rights Is A Terrible Idea
Re: Re:
Except that while anything you learn that way can be used to save lives, in the public interest, such confessions are INADMISSIBLE in court. If you have enough physical evidence to not need a confession, great. If your case comes down to needing that confession or the accused walks away a free man...then the exception means he walks.
On the post: Prenda Now In Trouble In Another Case In California
Whether claiming spoliation helps you win...
On the post: Megaupload Points Out That The DOJ Has Contradicted Itself Concerning Legality Of Serving Megaupload
Re: SO no US address = immune from all prosecution?
Really now?
On the post: San Diego Cop Thinks You Might Have Turned Your Cell Phone Into A Gun And That 'Officer Safety' Trumps Constitutional Rights
Re: Re: Someone else will pay for his abuse of power.
On the post: San Diego Cop Thinks You Might Have Turned Your Cell Phone Into A Gun And That 'Officer Safety' Trumps Constitutional Rights
Re: Re:
On the post: San Diego Cop Thinks You Might Have Turned Your Cell Phone Into A Gun And That 'Officer Safety' Trumps Constitutional Rights
Re: California is ridiculous
On the post: YouTube Wins Yet Another Complete Victory Over Viacom; Court Mocks Viacom's Ridiculous Legal Theories
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So Masnick has taken a postion on copyright?
The only natural rights are the right to take whatever you're strong enough to take and the right to fight to the death to defend what's yours.
Every other "right" is a creation of the sorts of agreements you called kangarooski a caveman over and are as artificial as the tax code.
On the post: YouTube Wins Yet Another Complete Victory Over Viacom; Court Mocks Viacom's Ridiculous Legal Theories
Re:
On the post: YouTube Wins Yet Another Complete Victory Over Viacom; Court Mocks Viacom's Ridiculous Legal Theories
Re: Re:
On the post: San Diego Cop Thinks You Might Have Turned Your Cell Phone Into A Gun And That 'Officer Safety' Trumps Constitutional Rights
Re: Cell Guns
On the post: San Diego Cop Thinks You Might Have Turned Your Cell Phone Into A Gun And That 'Officer Safety' Trumps Constitutional Rights
Re: He's actually correct, in a manner of speaking
On the post: New Jersey Lawmaker Proposes Legislation To Ban Games With Mature Content From Public Places
Re: I hearby ban the horse and buggy!
On the post: New Jersey Lawmaker Proposes Legislation To Ban Games With Mature Content From Public Places
Re:
Anybody got a copy they could forward to the NJ legislature?
On the post: New Jersey Lawmaker Proposes Legislation To Ban Games With Mature Content From Public Places
Re: BREAKING NEWS
On the post: New Jersey Lawmaker Proposes Legislation To Ban Games With Mature Content From Public Places
Re: And what next?
On the post: Sorry, Having IMDB Accurately List Your Age Doesn't Entitle You To A Million Dollars
Re: Re:
On the post: US Gov't Tops Itself In Waiting Years Before Responding To FOIA Requests With Nothing
Re: Re:
On the post: US Gov't Tops Itself In Waiting Years Before Responding To FOIA Requests With Nothing
███████████?
███ ;██████████████& #9608;█████████████ 608;█████████████π 8;█████████
██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;███████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████
██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;███████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████
██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;███████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████ ██████████████&# 9608;█████████████` 08;██████████████ ;████████████
That's what I think and why. Anyone agree?