RSS
Australian Gov't Delays Vote On Latest Censorship Proposal
from the might-not-survive dept
It seems like nearly every year we have a story about Australian politicians pushing plans to censor the internet. And while the politicians pushing them always insist that there's widespread support, there are always huge protests, and the laws never seem to get passed. So it's interesting to note that the latest attempt to censor the internet may also be dead in the water. Apparently, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy -- the main supporter of the plan -- has admitted that the legislation has been moved to the backburner, and it is unlikely to be passed before the election. Given how many times these proposals have been made and failed, it makes you wonder why they keep trying.
I’m looking for policy...
Jon Potter: Software Patent Trolls Can Be Stopped By U.S. Patent Office And Congress
Application Developers Alliance Applauds Schumer Plan To Introduce Patent Legislation
I have an idea...
Finding Co-Founders in a Recovering Economy
5 Things You Should Know About Crowdfunding For Startups
I have a business...
How To Successfully Get Your App Into China
Why 50,000 Monthly Active Users Weren't Enough To Stop This Company From Pivoting, With Spun Co-Founder Scott Lindenbaum
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's domestic politics
The only reason that the Australian government is pursuing is domestic politics. They need the vote of Senator Steve Fielding (from the right-wing Family First party) to get their legislative program through the Senate. The government has promised the internet filter in return for his vote on most matters. This requires that they maintain a credible plan to introduce the filter. So they have run trials, held conferences and now have a implementation forum. However, do you notice how the implementation keeps on slipping? How it's now delayed until after the next election (due at the end of 2010).
I'll let you into a political secret. Steve Fielding is up for re-election and his chances are zero, nada, nil. He was only ever elected in the first place because back-room operators for the two main parties - Labour and the Liberals (actually Conservatives) - got together to horse-trade and game the electoral system. Steve got elected by accident with only around 9000 primary votes. He was elected because he got both Labour and Liberal preferences and that's not going to happen again.
So, expect the internet filter to die quietly after the election. It will die because there was never any serious political will to implement it, not because of the protests and outrage
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's domestic politics
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's domestic politics
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Why they try again?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
They also put smokes up 25%. !
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What I did this weekend ...
While I dont think this is the app that will stop government monitoring, and free the net from censorship. I do believe that over the next couple years some simple to use and small application will be built that makes the governments want to monitor and censor the net impossible. It will be built in response to ever greater regulation of the internet.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What I did this weekend ...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Australia's unofficial motto:
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again.
You gotta give 'em credit for persistance.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The ALP
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Australia's unofficial motto:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The ALP
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
censorship on Topix
Topix practices fraudulent censorship. If you speak out in support of public education, as I was, you are shadow-banned. If you speak against organized religion or its shady icons like Pat Robertson and Benny Hinn, you are shadow-banned. If you speak eloquently for healthcare for needy Americans and show how its benefits have made life more desirable in other societies of the world, your sanction by Topix is being shadow-banned. If you point out hateful racists who call the President of the United States or the Speaker of the House or the Honorable Sonia Sotomayor the vilest names and even threaten them with death or great bodily harm, your reward is to be shadow-banned.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
censorship on TOPIX
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
more on censorship on Topix
Once a commentator has been put under moderation (and I have been), a 3-5 minute delay is put on their comments before they are published. The trolls are then notified, thus given time to come up with a response and attach it to the comment.
I ran a test on Topix, posting 28 comments after midnight, each time my comment was published 5 minutes after I had written it, with a troll comment already attached to it. I took screen shots of the entire process and documented the times.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
more on censorship on Topix
I have documented this practice for 5 months, took screen shots of the abuses, and found many instances of trolls actively bullying off and scaring away real person commentators. This is not only censorship, this is harassment.
Why is Tech Dirt looking at Australia? when we have censorship happening right here, on Topix.com, the largest internet forums connected to newspapers in America.
When does Tech Dirt plan to report on this?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
yet more on censorship on Topix
The quickness of the troll comment's posting, so close to the moment the liberal's comment is, implies the automaton must be alerted ahead of time, I have documented this.
This, Tech Dirt, is the dirtiest of dirt.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
new shadow-banning practice on Topix
Yesterday morning I decided to change my user pic. My user pic so threatened Topix.com - they shadow-banned it! I documented the whole thing. They de-shadow-banned it later that afternoon, after being informed their practice had been twittered to the world:
http://www.topix.net/forum/source/pasadena-star-news/TA62183B9KRRBSESS/p5
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Bully-trolling on Topix
Bully-trolls are on Topix threads to bully away commentators.
I saw one blogger for example, an honest one, who wrote after being bullied: "I am leaving and never visiting these threads again" - how many times is that happening daily across the Nation?
I saw another blogger, have his wife and family attacked by trolls, over and over again. He stuck it out, one of the very, very few who do.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I have confronted Chris Tolles, CEO of Topix.com, on 3 of his own threads:
How about less bad behavior on Topix Chris Tolles? a whole lot less!
http://www.topix.net/forum/news/topix/TRNK6QM6P80GCFA0T#lastPost
The bad guys lose! calling out Chris Tolles of Topix.com.
http://www.topix.net/forum/news/topix/TMCUFVSGMQML6UJ4D#lastPost
Chris Tolles calls in the trolls, on his post supporting anonymous blogging
http://www.topix.net/forum/news/topix/T6LPP0OCV23HVKUPK/p3#lastPost
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
TOPIX
Yor will never see it on Topix.com
I have been banned for telling the varafible TRUTH
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I have learned, Tech Dirt, that commentators are receiving death threats on Topix, I wrote it up:
Death threats ignored on Topix.com
http://open.salon.com/blog/virginia888/2010/06/10/death_threats_ignored_on_topixcom
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment