Plurk Overplaying Hand After Microsoft Code Copying; Meanwhile Status.net Says 'Take Our Code, Please'

from the take-the-publicity-and-go-with-it dept

Lots of people got a good ironic laugh from the news that Microsoft, which has repeatedly complained about "piracy" in China, got caught blatantly copying code from a small startup named Plurk. Microsoft blamed a vendor and shut down the service. Plurk, for its part, got a ton of free publicity, and apparently it doesn't want to give it up. It's sent out a statement to lots of media folks (and us) with absolutely nothing of substance, but which says that the company is still considering legal action, while going on and on about how its just a small company that can't even afford sales people or a marketing person to write this email. And yet, it thinks it wants to distract itself with a lawsuit against Microsoft? If it can't afford sales people, those lawyers might be a bit costly. Yes, Microsoft copied your code. Time to use that to your advantage, and whining about the legal action you might take doesn't get anyone else to actually care about your product.

Meanwhile, another provider of similar software (though open sourced), Status.net took a smarter approach. Blaise points out that Status.net put up a blog post telling Microsoft to go right ahead and take its code. After all, it's open source (and they have a Chinese translation already). That's what you're supposed to do.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    aguywhoneedstenbucks (profile), Dec 17th, 2009 @ 2:06pm

    It's a ploy to get a larger settlement. They can't be that stupid.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Kazi, Dec 17th, 2009 @ 2:11pm

    Re:

    One has to wonder who's more stupid

    Aguy
    Microsoft
    Status.net
    Me

    I mean,everyone has a point without any evidence.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    Dark Helmet (profile), Dec 17th, 2009 @ 2:19pm

    And...

    Cue an Angry Dude rant complete with accusations of Mike being in bed with Microsoft in 5...4...3...2..1...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Microsoft, Dec 17th, 2009 @ 2:24pm

    It's overhyped anyway and works a lot like twitter. why would we want to be on the twittscape? its pathetic PATHETIC!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Will (profile), Dec 17th, 2009 @ 3:46pm

    Code every actually unique?

    I'm not that experienced in the industry, but what I have learned is that almost every bit of code ever to be written has most likely already been written in some very similar form. The only unique part of it is combining different pieces into something that is mostly unique. I don't understand how anyone can claim copyright on code when the code used probably contained many pieces of code that the programmers got from the internet or have saved from old projects (like really useful functions) that may again also be copyrighted.

    Is there anyone who can explain this to me? Like why it makes any sense at all to be able to copyright code?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Ptchaw, Dec 17th, 2009 @ 4:22pm

    Re: Code every actually unique?

    Its an interesting idea, although you could also say...

    "almost every sentence ever to be written has most likely already been written in some very similar form. The only unique part of it is combining different sentences into something that is mostly unique"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 17th, 2009 @ 4:32pm

    Re: Re:

    Me.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    Robert Ring (profile), Dec 17th, 2009 @ 5:45pm

    Plurk, here's a marketing idea:

    Put out advertisements explaining that your code is so awesome that Microsoft tried outright stealing it.

    Problem solved.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    icon
    Will (profile), Dec 17th, 2009 @ 8:31pm

    Re: Re: Code every actually unique?

    The difference is when your actually creating the work. When writing something, exactly what you say isn't always as important is what the message you are trying to convey.

    But when programming, you run into something you need your program to do, maybe it is sort 2 lists of words into one that is alphabetized. To do this part of your program you could either create the code from scratch or just search google and probably find either exactly what you need or something every close.

    I feel like that is a major difference between the two. One can create an amazing program with close they only copied from the internet and a few minor fixes. But for a book or a paper to be written you need more then just sentences copied.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Dec 17th, 2009 @ 11:57pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Yes, I believe you :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Ganesh Ranganathan, Jan 1st, 2010 @ 12:34pm

    I dont think they will sue Microsoft, who has probably an army of high paid lawyers from years of antitrust legislation.

    But what better way of getting publicity than having your code copied by the biggest IT company in the world? :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This