Retired Telco PR Exec Who Sent XYZ Corp. Letter To FCC Insists He Wrote It
from the uh-huh... dept
We've already written about how a former PR exec from what became AT&T has been outed as the guy who sent a letter to the FCC where he forgot to take out the boilerplate XYZ Organization that was almost certainly left there by the AT&T lobbyists who wrote the letter for him. However, one of our commenters noted that MediaPost spoke to the guy, Bob Sells, who insists that he wrote the letter with the XYZ part included:
Sells, a 77-year-old retired public relations executive in Little Rock, tells MediaPost that he often writes letters with placeholders and fills in the correct text later, but overlooked the reference to XYZ in this case.Really? I'm really trying to give this guy the benefit of the doubt, but I can't come up with a single explanation for why he would write "XYZ Organization" when writing a letter himself from a group of people he supposedly represents. If you're the one writing the letter, on behalf of your supposed organization, why would you include "XYZ Organization"?






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Can't a guy represent more than 1 group ?
I do marketing for several clients. If there was a legislative issue that affected them I might write to my representative from each of them. And if I was really lazy I might re-use some of the letter.
In addition to replacing boilerplate text I'd probably reword a few paragraphs too...
But if I was 77 I woudl reserve the right to have a senior moment and forget to replace something.
I'm not saying that I believe this for a minute in this case - simply that if you, Mike, cannot think of a single scenario where the guy might be telling the truth then you have a fairly limited imagination.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Of course he did
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/document/view?id=7020142055
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov /ecfs2/document/view?id=7020141314
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Sounds like AT&T has the same play book.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I believe him
It could have happened that way.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
What do you expect?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
That said, I don't believe him.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment