Entertainment Industry Propaganda Organization Kicks Off Hilarious Astroturf Letter Writing Campaign

from the good-luck-with-that,-pat dept

The "Copyright Alliance" is a propaganda organization put together by the entertainment industry, pretending to focus on "the rights of creators," but which has always been focused on strengthening the monopolies of the middlemen (the same folks who quite frequently screw over the creators). Recently, the Copyright Alliance came out with its latest astroturfing attempt, with an automatic letter generator that will pop out cloned letters that the Copyright Alliance itself will send to President Obama and Vice President Biden. The tone of the letter is rather silly, as it seems to suggest that Obama and Biden haven't been supporting the entertainment industry's position all along -- and that there's some huge legislative movement afoot to wipe out artists' rights. It is, as William Patry notes, yet another attempt by the entertainment industry to create a folk devil and a moral panic in an attempt to further prop up its business model. Patry, not surprisingly, takes little time ripping the letter to shreds:
It is very hard not to laugh in the face of such ugliness and to wonder where the reason is in such dysfunctional nonsense, but what came to my mind was Helen Reddy's 1972 anthem, which began: "I am woman, hear me roar/In numbers too big to ignore." The moral panic in the Alliance's letter is that the very essence of what makes America America is threatened by evil forces that supposedly have launched an assault demanding that Helen Reddy and her 11 million colleagues give their works away for free, that the evil doers be permitted to have their way with the vestal virgins of America's copyright sweethearts. This is of course complete baloney. Name one piece of pending legislation that would accomplish what the Alliance claims. Name one lawsuit currently pending that would accomplish what the Alliance claims. There are none.
Indeed. At first, I had considered setting up our own "letter generator" in response, highlighting the problems of stricter copyright law, the vast and ever growing evidence of how copyright law is misused by the very organizations that back the Copyright Alliance to prop up obsolete business models rather than innovate. On top of that, such a letter would highlight all of the creative content creators who have been embracing new technologies for creating, promoting and distributing content along with embracing new business models and finding that they work better than the old models.

But, honestly, I'd like to believe that our President and Vice President aren't swayed by a bunch of form letters from an industry propagandist, and that, instead, people would be inspired to write their own letters highlighting the creativity that new technology has allowed -- and how some legacy industries have repeatedly abused copyright law to stifle such innovation and creativity many times over. Luckily, Jonathan Melber has a nice prototype of just such an open letter, where he highlights our cultural heritage, and how content creators regularly build on the works of others in creating something new and wonderful -- but how that tradition is often blocked by an industry that doesn't like outsiders trying to route around its control.

Separately, the Copyright Alliance should be ashamed of itself for blatantly lying with statistics. It tries to claim the right to speak for $1.52 trillion of the nation's GDP. This is pure farce. It's based on a study done by (you guessed it) the industry itself in the form of the International Intellectual Property Alliance, which is yet another propaganda/lobbying organization made up of the other lobbying/propaganda groups representing different industries: including the MPAA, the RIAA, the BSA and the ESA among others. In other words, hardly an unbiased source.

The methodology of the study is pretty laughable. It's based on WIPO's stated methodology, which is basically "count absolutely everything that even remotely touches on copyright" and then assume that every bit of that revenue is because of strong copyright laws. Hell, by the methodology used in the report, all of the revenue we earn here -- despite all the content on this site being public domain -- gets credited to "the copyright industry." It's such a typical DC-insider move: use totally bogus stats to bolster a weak argument. But that's the game that the Copyright Alliance has played since its inception. Just defining all those industries as "copyright industries" is misleading, because it implies that their revenue is due to copyright. But it's much worse than that. Companies that make furniture or jewelry are specifically listed as being a part of "the copyright industry" for purposes of this calculation. Yes, because without copyright, no one would be making furniture, right?

Even more amusing -- that same report shows continued and strong growth in what it defines as the copyright industries. So much for that massive attack destroying American society, huh? And this highlights the intellectual dishonesty of the Copyright Alliance and its backers. For the sake of making themselves look "big" they have to throw everything and the kitchen sink into their estimates and show that it's "growing." But for the sake of demonizing anyone who might seek to stop abuse of copyright laws, they have to claim that those industries are under constant attack, even as they grow to record levels. Propaganda at its finest.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 8:38am

    "destroying American society"

    Funny thing, it's because of copied DVDs and CDs that American culture is so popular among the poorer parts of the planet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    YouAreWrong, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 9:46am

    because the solitaire diamond ring... a ridiculously high margin item (and occupies an obscene percentage of diamond ring sales) would never be sold if there was no copyright for a single stud on a ring...

    oh wait.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 10:07am

    I was hoping the letter would be good Markov fodder, but it's too short and too repetitive, I guess.

    I did get such gems as "We, the dysfunction of America" and "Some would try to control the United States" though.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    icon
    bwp (profile), Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 10:11am

    Money not letters

    "But, honestly, I'd like to believe that our President and Vice President aren't swayed by a bunch of form letters from an industry propagandist,..."

    You're right Mike, they aren't swayed by the letters but by the money that the industry puts in their campaign coffers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    lavi d (profile), Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 10:24am

    The Coming IP Wars

    You know, assuming we don't have real, toe-to-toe nuclear war with the [name your favorite contender] instead.

    Millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of people the world over violate copyright knowingly and unkowingly daily. The various IP industries (software, audio, video and soon print) have very little chance of changing this phenomenon without some sort of extremely draconian, nearly world-wide technical intervention.

    As people become more and more accustomed to infringement as a part of daily life, the industries call for more and more protection.

    These industries are either headed for a major reorganization, or we are all going to end up surgically "enhanced" with government-mandated IP-protection devices.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    jerome (profile), Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 12:07pm

    What is the message?

    Down the page there is a Captcha system. It asked me to enter the word “attorney.” Are they trying to send a hidden message?
    (I of course made a screenshot)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Richard (profile), Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 4:13pm

    They opened the agenda

    When I was growing up copyright law hadn't changed much for years and was generally accepted.

    The copyright extensions worldwide (both in time and in scope) of the last few years have started people thinking..

    If terms can be retrospectively extended - and that is legally and morally OK then surely they can also be reduced.

    If they persist in sowing the wind then who is to blame for what they may eventually reap.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    painter, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 4:24pm

    'The methodology of the study'

    It seems like all copyright agencies have a very circular sense of good and bad.
    Agencies really think they are the 'creative industry' and so whats good for them is... Good.
    I am an visual artist and in my, thankfully limited dealings, with copyright agencies they have all come across as having a quality of selfabsorbed mediocrity.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Dan, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 5:44pm

    It is abundantly clear that the media industry has bought and paid for Biden and Obama is just to busy to even defend and enforce our fourth amendment rights. The justice Dept. is stacked with industry flacks. I see no help on the horizon from the government. Money talks and shit walks. The underlying problem is a political system that is limited to the republicrats, no one else need apply. Maybe another depression would have a good thing as it would have presented an opportunity for alternate political parties beyond the two flocks of black and white sheep we now have. Mediocrity reigns and corruption rules.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    painter, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 7:37pm

    RE: Dan's comment

    All these things actually have a real cost. The burden of paying for massive layers of completely useless management of copyright agencies through to the Lehmann Bros. bank managment has brought America to its knees. Just imagine if all this money had been spent on actually making new things! If China is to outstrip America completely it will be because it has much lower management costs. The copyright agencies in particular seem to be a 'make work' scheme for the privileged and very mediocre.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    painter, Oct 2nd, 2009 @ 8:42pm

    RE: Dan's comment

    All these things actually have a real cost. The burden of paying for massive layers of completely useless management of copyright agencies through to the Lehmann Bros. bank managment has brought America to its knees. Just imagine if all this money had been spent on actually making new things! If China is to outstrip America completely it will be because it has much lower management costs. The copyright agencies in particular seem to be a 'make work' scheme for the privileged and very mediocre.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This