RSS
Why Doesn't Amazon Allow Referrals On Passed Links?
from the keep-up-with-the-times dept
A few months ago, we were talking about the growing value of "passed links" or "earned links." These are links that to things that others passed on to you, via email or social networking services like Facebook and Twitter. As more people have been using these services, the value of such links have grown as traffic generators. And yet, some have just realized that Amazon doesn't reward affiliates for using such links. It's not difficult to understand how this came about, but it certainly seems like the type of thing that the company should reconsider. Basically, Amazon's original affiliate program was so that you could send people to Amazon from your own site. In order to become an affiliate your site had to be approved. But if you're just passing around links, then that has little or nothing to do with your site, and thus Amazon doesn't pay such referral fees. I would imagine that Amazon is also quite worried about potential fraud.
But given the growing popularity of things like Twitter and Facebook, it seems like Amazon might want to reconsider this policy, and recognize that if someone promotes a book via these services, they're equally as deserving of the affiliate referral fee than if they had simply posted the link on their own site.
9 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Sony Music Raised Prices On Whitney Houston's Music... Less Than 30 Minutes After She Died
- Sky News Tells Reporters Not To Use Twitter To Break News Without Permission
- Does Google Have What It Takes To Be A Platform, Rather Than A Product, Company?
- Syrian Government Posting Pro-Government Messages On Pages Of Dissidents After Getting Their Passwords
- NY Times Editor Claims Twitter Killing Conversation, While His Tweets Spawn Conversation
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Spam
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Spam's the issue
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No links in customer reviews and comments
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Spam
Hmm. Doesn't that suggest more about your friends? :) There are ways Amazon could prevent spamming. For example, it's fine to approve initially a website, and then allow that code to be used elsewhere.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
That's why I ditched Amazon
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124603593605261787.html
Amazon Sues New York To Strike Down Online Tax
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/amazon-online-york,news-1228.html
Simple answer to the posed question is taxes and state control of taxes.
If Amazon paid websites for referrals then that would mean that these sites would be official Amazon affiliates opening Amazon up to additional state control and taxes.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Amazon does pay websites for referrals... Amazon is already open to those taxes (and is shutting affiliates down in states that are going to start demanding those taxes, which hurts the affiliate as a business in that state!) but it has to be *your* site. What we're talking about is other people sites - should they still pay you if you offer Amazon links via Facebook, or Techdirt - in a comment, say or wall post...? Or would that encourage people spamming those sites?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
No, it suggests how every single thing that's ever happened to the Internet has been polluted. Over a decade later we are STILL very busy peeing in our drinking well, thank you very much!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment