White House Opens Up For Questions About The Economy
from the but-what-about-answers? dept
I've been a bit critical for the Obama administration's lack of transparency and inclusion on certain issues -- or rather, their claims of being "transparent" and "inclusive" by simply asking their mailing list to "sell" the packages put together in backrooms. I was hoping for a much more participatory process whereby citizens actually could take part a bit earlier in the process. So, it's good to see a step in the right direction, as the White House has announced its Open For Questions initiatives (thanks to everyone who sent this in). The site lets people ask questions of the president, and lets people see and vote on each other's questions. The President will then answer a few of the "top" questions.
This is definitely a nice thing to add, but I'm hopeful that it ends up going further. At this point, it seems like nothing much more than a glorified suggestion/Q&A box. Rather than involving the community to tackle the questions raised, it simply gives them to the President to answer back. Real participation is about allowing the community to help out -- not just pass big questions up to the top. Obviously, it's still quite early in the administration, so hopefully we'll see more participatory tools on the way as well. This is definitely a good step -- and I don't mean to take away from it. But, I'm going to keep pushing for further participation and further transparency because I think it could be quite powerful and transformative.
22 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- The SOPA/PIPA Protest Shows Why There Needs To Be Complete Transparency With TPP
- Why Chris Dodd Failed With His SOPA/PIPA Strategy
- Hollywood Studio Execs Upset That President Obama Didn't Stay Bought; Insist They Won't Donate More
- Is It Time For A Federal Scanning Commission?
- Will The Food Industry Ever Swallow Transparency's Bitter Pill?





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Question 1 - When did "trillion" become the new "billion"?
A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than to have him answer your question.
Unless you manage to hack into his teleprompter...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
sham
I sadly wouldn't be surprised if we find a giant amount of sock puppeting going onto lower questions they don't want to talk about, etc.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Question 2
Is "The Obama Deception" Movie true?
Sincerely,
America
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Operators are standing by
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
10 questions at a time
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
the mewling of girly men
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
When this was tried in the UK
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Stop the bleeding
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is an old tried and true consulting trick. It is nothing more than a moderated workshop, led by the consultant. You bring a bunch of people in a room and talk to them about the problem and then guide them to the solution that you have already came up with. When the process is done, the people in the room actually believe that they came up with the solution and have more buy in.
It is actually a very good technique if you do it right. Of course, it is a sham, but it works.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Transparency in government
I started to participate, but when I realized there was no discussion involved, opted out.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Sock puppets?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Sure
How many trillions in debt will it take for you to wake up Coward?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Pain 2012
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
President Obama
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
taxes
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Well, not so open anymore....
I went to take a look and guess what, no longer accepting questions, guess they answered them all already. Time to go home, nothing to see here folks, move along.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment