RSS
Center for American Progress, Meet the Streisand Effect
from the beware-the-backlash dept
Back in 2005, Mike coined the term "the Streisand Effect" to describe the situation where an attempt to suppress information generates increased publicity for that information. Our latest example comes via my friend Matthew Yglesias, who on Friday had some choice words for a center-left organization called Third Way. Matt blogs on a site run by Center for American Progress (CAP), though with full editorial control over the posts on his particular blog on the site. Despite calling Third Way out, the post got little overall attention on the blog.
On Sunday, however, readers of Matt's blog were treated to this creepy post in which Matt's boss, Jennifer Palmieri, noted that his posts don't reflect the opinions of the Center for American Progress, and then insisted that CAP has "a great deal of respect for [Third Way's] critical thinking and excellent work product." This is a great illustration of the differences between traditional and web-based media. In a traditional paper publication, everything is subject to editorial control, and in all likelihood Matt would have been asked to tone down his criticism of Third Way before his writing hit the presses. But Matt's blog gets posted unfiltered, complete with curse words and spelling errors. The immediacy of Matt's blog is a big part of what keeps readers coming back to the site. And it's also what made Palmieri's post so damaging.
Although Matt's blog is hosted on CAP's site, it's Matt's blog, and readers expect to get Matt's unfiltered opinions. Having Matt's boss hijack his blog in order to publicly reprimand him is really jarring. And then there's the Streisand Effect. Everyone would have forgotten about Matt's original post within a few days had someone at Third Way not called Matt's boss and demanded an apology. Instead, the entire liberal blogosphere is talking about Matt's post... and about Third Way's thin skin. The backlash is going to do far more damage to Third Way's reputation than Matt's original post could have.
8 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- CarrierIQ Fails At The Internet: Threatens Security Researcher With Copyright Infringement Claim Over His Research [Update]
- Building Company Realizes That Threatening A Blogger With Bogus Libel Suit Was A Bad Idea; Sincerely Apologizes
- Gamestop Discovers The Streisand Effect; Gives OnLive Tons Of Free Publicity In Trying To Take Away Coupons
- Malaysian Man Required To 'Retract' Defamatory Tweet 100 Times On Twitter; Streisanding The Whole Thing
- Dan Snyder Helps Us Demonstrate The Streisand Effect In Numbers
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
hmmmm . . .
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
not quite reprimand...
On the flip side, my workplace asks that we do the same when we post. I just don't do it because I don't make reference to things at my work. (nobody knows where I work based off this post, for example). If I do reference my work for advice or something, then I do disclaimer it similar to how the "guest poster" did as well. Not that I want to, but maybe Mike can dig up where that liability comes from again?
However, it doesn't seem like a reprimand, just stupidly stating the obvious. Boo on american progress all the same.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
let's hear it for...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
It's probably worth pointing out....
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/12/teach_the_controversy.php
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's probably worth pointing out....
That's a fair point... though the overall issue remains. Calling out that particular post did a lot more harm for Third Way. If Third Way or Palmieri had thought about it at all, they would have realized that it was best to just let the issue die. Calling extra attention to it is just a bad idea.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
People are interesting creatures
In such a scenario, Matt's fear may be self-generated, and he just needs to play it out on the blog and call back the dogs. I wouldn't be surprised if DC has at-will labor laws on the books like most states. Should this be the case, she probably would have found a reason to let Matt go well before this. But, this isn't the case. Matt may have found a cleverly disguised pal, and just doesn't know it yet.
Another second scenario is that Jennifer may be getting heat from her management for something. Such a scenario is more difficult to discern. Jennifer may need his disparate help.
Either way, vilifying Jennifer doesn't help anyone, and will only result in difficult times at the office.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Third World and Matthew Yglesia's blog
NOT ME, they all said the same thing (when you take out the emotion and look at it logically - oh, I forgot!! We no longer use logic in America!). Sorry people, my bad!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment